Literature DB >> 21280961

Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.

Daryl J Bem1.   

Abstract

The term psi denotes anomalous processes of information or energy transfer that are currently unexplained in terms of known physical or biological mechanisms. Two variants of psi are precognition (conscious cognitive awareness) and premonition (affective apprehension) of a future event that could not otherwise be anticipated through any known inferential process. Precognition and premonition are themselves special cases of a more general phenomenon: the anomalous retroactive influence of some future event on an individual's current responses, whether those responses are conscious or nonconscious, cognitive or affective. This article reports 9 experiments, involving more than 1,000 participants, that test for retroactive influence by "time-reversing" well-established psychological effects so that the individual's responses are obtained before the putatively causal stimulus events occur. Data are presented for 4 time-reversed effects: precognitive approach to erotic stimuli and precognitive avoidance of negative stimuli; retroactive priming; retroactive habituation; and retroactive facilitation of recall. The mean effect size (d) in psi performance across all 9 experiments was 0.22, and all but one of the experiments yielded statistically significant results. The individual-difference variable of stimulus seeking, a component of extraversion, was significantly correlated with psi performance in 5 of the experiments, with participants who scored above the midpoint on a scale of stimulus seeking achieving a mean effect size of 0.43. Skepticism about psi, issues of replication, and theories of psi are also discussed. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21280961     DOI: 10.1037/a0021524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  67 in total

1.  Too good to be true: publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

2.  Replication studies: Bad copy.

Authors:  Ed Yong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A Bayes factor meta-analysis of Bem's ESP claim.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

4.  Introduction to Bayesian Inference for Psychology.

Authors:  Alexander Etz; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  Observation-Oriented Modeling: Going Beyond "Is It All a Matter of Chance"?

Authors:  James W Grice; Maria Yepez; Nicole L Wilson; Yuichi Shoda
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.821

Review 6.  Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Feeling the past: the absence of experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on text processing.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler; Donald J Foss; Ruchira Podali; Megan Zirnstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

8.  Getting comfortable with near death experiences. Out of one's mind or beyond the brain? The challenge of interpreting near-death experiences.

Authors:  Dean Radin
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

Review 9.  State of Science, "Intuition in Nursing Practice": A Systematic Review Study.

Authors:  Parkhide Hassani; Alireza Abdi; Rostam Jalali
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Extinction from a rationalist perspective.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.