Literature DB >> 23203416

NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments.

Gitte Keidser1, Harvey Dillon, Lyndal Carter, Anna O'Brien.   

Abstract

NAL-NL1, the first procedure from the National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) for prescribing nonlinear gain, was a purely theoretically derived formula aimed at maximizing speech intelligibility for any input level of speech while keeping the overall loudness of speech at or below normal loudness. The formula was obtained through an optimization process in which speech intelligibility and loudness were predicted from selected models. Using updated models and applying some revisions to the derivation process, a theoretically derived NAL-NL2 formula was obtained in a similar way. Further adjustments, directed by empirical data collected in studies using NAL-NL1 as the baseline response, have been made to the theoretically derived formula. Specifically, empirical data have demonstrated that (a) female hearing aid users prefer lower overall gain than male users; (b) new hearing aid users with more than a mild hearing loss prefer increasingly less gain with increasing degree of hearing loss than experienced hearing aid users, and require up to 2 years to adapt to gain levels selected by experienced hearing aid users; (c) unilaterally and bilaterally fitted hearing aid users prefer overall gain levels that vary less than estimated by the bilateral correction factor; (d) adults prefer lower overall gain than children; and (e) people with severe/profound hearing loss prefer lower compression ratios than predicted when fitted with fast-acting compression. The literature and data leading to these conclusions are summarized and discussed in this article, and the procedure for implementing the adjustments to the theoretically derived NAL-NL2 formula is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23203416      PMCID: PMC4040825          DOI: 10.1177/1084713812468511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  46 in total

1.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.

Authors:  D Byrne; H Dillon; T Ching; R Katsch; G Keidser
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.

Authors:  G Keidser; F Grant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech.

Authors:  I Hochberg
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1975 Jan-Feb

4.  Most comfortable loudness for pure tones, noise, and speech.

Authors:  I M Ventry; R W Woods
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Directional audiometry. 3. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in patients with monaural hearing loss.

Authors:  F M Tonning
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  [Sex specific differences in loudness perception--reality or artefact?].

Authors:  J Hellbrück
Journal:  Z Exp Angew Psychol       Date:  1983

7.  A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  J W Hall; A D Harvey
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  The influence of listener's gender on the acceptance of background noise.

Authors:  Deanna S Rogers; Ashley W Harkrider; Samuel B Burchfield; Anna K Nabelek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Dana L Wilson; Nancy N Barlow; Carolyn Garner
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  31 in total

1.  Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Jennifer R Fowler; Jessica L Eggleston; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Robin R High; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Modern prescription theory and application: realistic expectations for speech recognition with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-18

5.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.

Authors:  Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu; Robyn M Cox
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Applying the Hearing Aid Fitting Standard to Selection for Adults.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Richard A Roberts; Gina Angley; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Il Joon Moon; Sun Hwa Jin; Ji Eun Choi; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

8.  Development of Improved Software Intelligent System for Audiological Solutions.

Authors:  S Rajkumar; S Muttan; V Sapthagirivasan; V Jaya; S S Vignesh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing-Aid Self-Fitting: User Interactions.

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd; Carol Mackersie
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.

Authors:  Suzanne Carr Levy; Daniel J Freed; Michael Nilsson; Brian C J Moore; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.