Literature DB >> 1397752

Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements.

R M Cox1, G C Alexander.   

Abstract

The goals of this investigation were to determine whether hearing aid benefit improved significantly over the first 10 weeks of hearing aid use and whether time-related changes in benefit (if any) were affected by the type of benefit measurement (i.e., objective or subjective). A total of 17 hearing-impaired subjects participated, with different subjects completing different phases of the study. Benefit was measured soon after the hearing aid fitting and again after 10 weeks of adjustment to hearing aid use. Objective benefit data were determined using the Connected Speech Test. No significant changes in objective benefit were noted in noisy or reverberant listening environments when visual cues were available. However, in a low-noise setting and in a noisy setting without visual cues, improvements in objective benefit were seen over time. Subjective benefit data were derived from responses to the Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. These data indicated significant benefit improvement over time in all five types of daily life situations assessed, although the improvement was small in reverberant and noisy environments. Significant, but modest, correlations were found between objective and subjective data for low-noise and reverberant listening environments. Comparison of experienced and novice hearing aid wearers suggested that although experienced wearers obtain more benefit than novice wearers, they evidence similar time-related changes in benefit during the first 10 weeks of new hearing aid use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1397752     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199206000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  22 in total

1.  Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments.

Authors:  Monique Boymans; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-04

Review 2.  Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-09

Review 3.  Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

4.  Curriculum for graduate courses in amplification.

Authors:  C V Palmer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-03

5.  Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process.

Authors:  B E Weinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-12

6.  The Audioscan RM500 Speechmap/DSL Fitting System.

Authors:  W A Cole; S T Sinclair
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-12

7.  Effects of Amplification and Hearing Aid Experience on the Contribution of Specific Frequency Bands to Loudness.

Authors:  Katie M Thrailkill; Marc A Brennan; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Is measured hearing aid benefit affected by seeing baseline outcome questionnaire responses?

Authors:  ShienPei Silverman; Megan Cates; Gabrielle Saunders
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lauren Kawaguchi; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Christi Miller
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.