| Literature DB >> 29793422 |
Kun-Li Xiang1,2, Andrey S Erst3,4, Xiao-Guo Xiang1, Florian Jabbour5, Wei Wang6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have favored dispersal (colonization) over vicariance (past fragmentation) events to explain eastern Asian-North American distribution patterns. In plants, however the disjunction between eastern Asia and western North America has been rarely examined using the integration of phylogenetic, molecular dating, and biogeographical methods. Meanwhile, the biogeographic patterns within eastern Asia remain poorly understood. The goldthread genus Coptis Salisb. includes 15 species disjunctly distributed in North America, Japan, mainland China, and Taiwan. We present a dated phylogeny for Coptis under the optimal clock model and infer its historical biogeography by comparing different biogeographic models.Entities:
Keywords: Ancestral range evolution; Climate change; Coptis; Eastern Asian; Taiwan; Western North America
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29793422 PMCID: PMC5968522 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-018-1195-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Geographic range of Coptis species. Doted lines in bold demarcate boundaries of the Holarctic and Paleotropical kingdoms according to Takhtajan [16]
Comparison of three clock models in BEAST analyses via Bayes factors
| Clock model | Marginal likelihood | Exponential | Lognormal | Random |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS implementation | ||||
| Exponential | − 8809.70 | – | 37.44 | −32.90 |
| Lognormal | − 8828.42 | −37.44 | – | −70.34 |
| Random | − 8793.25 | 32.90 | 70.34 | |
| SS implementation | ||||
| Exponential | − 8810.29 | – | 37.62 | −33.72 |
| Lognormal | − 8829.10 | −37.62 | – | −71.34 |
| Random | −8793.43 | 33.72 | 71.34 | – |
2ln Bayes factor (BF) was calculated by marginal likelihoods derived from path sampling (PS) and stepping-stone sampling (SS) implementations in BEAST. 2ln BF > 2.0 represents positive evidence, > 6.00 represents strong evidence, and > 10.00 represents very strong evidence [31]
Fig. 2Dated phylogeny of Coptis inferred from the combined plastid and nuclear data using BEAST under the random clock model and birth-death tree prior. Gray bars represent 95% highest posterior density intervals. Nodes of interests were marked as 1–5 in bold. All nodes are strongly supported (PP > 0.95) except for one node (in dashed line). Plio., Pliocene; Plt., Pleistocene
Comparison of the fit of three models of biogeographical range evolution and model-specific estimates for the different parameters
| Model | Ln | Parameter nb |
|
| AIC | ΔAIC | AICC | ΔAICC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DEC | −24.06 | 2 | 0.03 | 1.00 × 10− 12 | 52.12 | 3.59 | 53.04 | 3.58 |
| DIVALIKE | −22.27 | 2 | 0.03 | 1.00 × 10− 12 | 48.53 | 0 | 49.46 | 0 |
| BAYAREALIKE | −28.77 | 2 | 0.04 | 1.04 × 10−1 | 61.55 | 13.02 | 52.47 | 13.01 |
d = dispersal rate; e = extinction rate
Fig. 3Ancestral range estimation (ARE) for Copits BEAST using BioGeoBEARS under the DIVALIKE model. Labeled nodes (1 to 5, as referred to Fig. 2), with 95% highest posterior densities (grey bars), are discussed in the text. The estimated ancestral ranges with the highest ML probability are shown by boxes on each node. Additional file 2: Figure S1 provides all ARE per node with pies. A pie is placed in this figure at the root with the highest probability less than 50%. The depictions of temperature (in red) and sea level (in black) changes are modified from Zachos et al. [45] and Haq et al. [57], respectively. Plio., Pliocene; Plt., Pleistocene