| Literature DB >> 26990796 |
Laura P Lagomarsino1, Fabien L Condamine2, Alexandre Antonelli2,3, Andreas Mulch4,5, Charles C Davis1.
Abstract
The tropical Andes of South America, the world's richest biodiversity hotspot, are home to many rapid radiations. While geological, climatic, and ecological processes collectively explain such radiations, their relative contributions are seldom examined within a single clade. We explore the contribution of these factors by applying a series of diversification models that incorporate mountain building, climate change, and trait evolution to the first dated phylogeny of Andean bellflowers (Campanulaceae: Lobelioideae). Our framework is novel for its direct incorporation of geological data on Andean uplift into a macroevolutionary model. We show that speciation and extinction are differentially influenced by abiotic factors: speciation rates rose concurrently with Andean elevation, while extinction rates decreased during global cooling. Pollination syndrome and fruit type, both biotic traits known to facilitate mutualisms, played an additional role in driving diversification. These abiotic and biotic factors resulted in one of the fastest radiations reported to date: the centropogonids, whose 550 species arose in the last 5 million yr. Our study represents a significant advance in our understanding of plant evolution in Andean cloud forests. It further highlights the power of combining phylogenetic and Earth science models to explore the interplay of geology, climate, and ecology in generating the world's biodiversity.Entities:
Keywords: Andes; Lobelioideae; Neotropics; biodiversity hotspot; climate change; diversification; pollination syndromes; rapid radiation
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26990796 PMCID: PMC4950005 DOI: 10.1111/nph.13920
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Phytol ISSN: 0028-646X Impact factor: 10.151
Figure 1Growth form diversity in Neotropical bellflowers. (a) Siphocampylus tunarensis Zahlbr., a tree c. 7–10 m. (b) Centropogon congestus Gleason, a clonal herbaceous species of wet soil, c. 1.5 m. (c) Centropogon pulcher Zahlbr., a hanging vine. (d) Burmeistera sp., a hemi‐epiphytic herb. (e) Siphocampylus tunicatus Zahlbr., a tall shrub, with individual stems c. 5 m tall, arising from a single point. (f) Lysipomia muscoides Hook f., a minute rosette herb growing among moss in puna habitat. (g) Siphocampylus jelskii Zahlbr., a giant rosette shrub with elongated stems, each c. 1–2 m tall, apparently clonal, growing in high‐altitude grasslands. (h) Siphocamplus smilax Lammers, a xerophyte with a densely woody stem (probably water‐storing) growing in sandstone. (i) Siphocampylus williamsii Rubsy, a plant producing a small number of narrow aerial stems arising from a xylopodium, or underground tuber‐like stem. Photographs by: L. Lagomarsino (b–h), D. Santamaría‐Aguilar (a), and A. Fuentes (i).
Figure 2Diversification of Neotropical bellflowers. A time‐calibrated species‐level phylogeny shows the c. 5 Myr age of the largely Andean centropogonid clade (c. 550 species, node 1), whose origin is associated with a significant increase in diversification rate (yellow star) as detected by Bayesian Analysis of Macroevolutionary Mixture (BAMM). Lysipomia (c. 50 species) and Chilean Lobelia (four species) are indicated (nodes 2 and 3, respectively). Representative floral diversity, shown on the right, illustrates the striking phenotypic diversity in the clade (see Fig. 1 for comparable growth form diversity); scale bars, 0.5 cm. Diversification models examining the abiotic correlates of this rapid diversification include average paleoelevation of the tropical Andes through time (a) and global temperatures through time (c). Gray dots in (a) and (c) represent individual data points utilized to create the curves. Results from these models show inferred speciation (blue) and extinction (red) rates through time under models depending on paleoelevation (b) and paleotemperature (d). Additional diversification analyses using binary state‐speciation and extinction (BiSSE) demonstrate the effect of two abiotic and two biotic traits on net diversification rate: Andean occurrence (e; extra‐Andean (red) vs Andean (blue)), elevation (f; low elevation, ≤ 1900 m (orange) vs high elevation, > 1900 m (purple)), fruit type (g; dry capsules (light blue) vs fleshy berries (pink)), and pollinator type (h; invertebrate (yellow) vs vertebrate (green)). Trait scorings are color‐coded to the right of phylogeny. Outgroups were removed, and taxon names omitted because of space constraints. Photographs by L. Lagomarsino. Geological timescale shown at bottom from Walker et al. (2012).
Net diversification rates in the fastest species radiations in the Tree of Life, including the centropogonids
| Clade | Area | Organism | Species richness | Age (95% CI) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Eurasia | Plant | 200 | 1.5 (0.9–2.1) | 3.07 (2.12–5.12) | 2.88 (2.06–4.80) | 1.99 (1.42–3.32) |
| African cichlids (Salzburger | East African Lakes | Fishes | 1800 | 2.4 (1.22–4.02) | 2.83 (1.69–5.76) | 2.71 (1.62–5.34) | 2.14 (1.28–4.22) |
|
| Andes | Plant | 81 | 1.47 (1.18–1.76) | 2.52 (2.10–3.14) | 2.33 (1.95–2.90) | 1.46 (1.22–1.82) |
|
| Andes | Plant | 90 | 1.89 (1.71–2.07) | 2.04 (1.84–2.23) | 1.87 (1.70–2.06) | 1.19 (1.08–1.31) |
|
| Cosmopolitan | Birds | 80 | 1.84 (1.40–1.89) | 2.0 (1.95–2.63) | 1.85 (1.80–2.44) | 1.16 (1.13–1.52) |
|
| Andes | Plant | 15 | 0.98 (0.79–1.17) | 2.06 (1.72–2.55) | 1.82 (1.52–2.26) | 0.84 (0.70–1.04) |
|
| Andes | Plant | 170 | 1.6–3.0 | 1.48–2.78 | 1.39–2.6 | 0.94–1.77 |
|
| Mediterranean | Plant | 10 | 1.04 (0.66–1.29) | 1.54 (1.25–2.44) | 1.35 (1.09–2.13) | 0.57 (0.46–0.89) |
|
| Madagascar | Insects | 86 | 2.6 (1.7–3.6) | 1.45 (1.04–2.21) | 1.34 (0.97–2.05) | 0.85 (0.61–1.29) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Espeletiinae (Madriñán | Andes | Plant | 120 | 4.04 (2.42–5.92) | 1.01 (0.69–1.69) | 0.944 (0.64–1.58) | 0.62 (0.42–1.04) |
| AMC clade of Hawaiian | Hawaii | Insect | 91 | 4.40 (3.45–11.82) | 0.94 (0.35–1.2) | 0.88 (0.33–1.12) | 0.58 (0.22–0.74) |
|
| Neotropics | Plant | 300 | 5.9 (2.0–13.4) | 0.85 (0.37–2.5) | 0.8 (0.35–2.36) | 0.57 (0.25–1.69) |
| Ruschioideae (Klak | South Africa | Plant | 1563 | 3.8–8.7 | 0.7–1.75 | 0.73–1.68 | 0.58–1.31 |
| Bee hummingbirds (McGuire | Andes | Birds | 36 | 5 | 0.58 | 0.53 | 0.29 |
| Silversword alliance (Baldwin & Sanderson, | Hawaii | Plants | 28 | 5.2 (4.4–6.0) | 0.51 (0.44–60) | 0.46 (0.40–0.54) | 0.24 (0.21–0.29) |
|
| Neotropics | Plant | 51 | 1.5–7.1 | 0.46–2.16 | 0.42–1.98 | 0.24–1.16 |
|
| Western Americas | Plant | 196 | 5.0–13.2 | 0.35–0.92 | 0.33–0.86 | 0.22–0.59 |
| Hawaiian lobeliads (Givnish | Hawaii | Plants | 126 | 13.6 (10.49–16.71) | 0.30 (0.25–0.39) | 0.28 (0.23–0.37) | 0.19 (0.15–0.24) |
| Hawaiian Drosophilidae (Lapoint | Hawaii | Insect | 1000 | 25.15 (23.90–27.46) | 0.25 (0.23–0.26) | 0.24 (0.22–0.25) | 0.18 (0.17–0.19) |
|
| North America | Amphibian | 30 | 8–11 | 0.24–0.34 | 0.22–0.31 | 0.12–0.16 |
| Hummingbirds (all) (McGuire | Neotropics | Bird | 338 | 22.4 (20.3–24.7) | 0.23 (0.21–0.25) | 0.22 (0.20–0.24) | 0.16 (0.14–0.17) |
|
| Australia | Reptile | 174 | c. 20 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.14 |
Rates of diversification as calculated using the statistic of Magallón & Sanderson (2001) under low, medium, and high estimated extinction (ε) for the centropogonid clade (bold text) rank ordered with other published rapid radiations. All rates in events Myr–1 per lineage. Estimates derived from reported ages and species richness from the relevant literature are cited. When possible, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ages are reported, except in cases where sufficient data were unavailable.