| Literature DB >> 35873994 |
Yiheng Wang1, Jiahui Sun1, Zhenyu Zhao1, Chao Xu2, Ping Qiao1,3, Sheng Wang1, Mengli Wang1, Zegang Xu4, Qingjun Yuan1, Lanping Guo1, Luqi Huang1.
Abstract
Root rot has been a major problem for cultivated populations of Coptis chinensis var. chinensis in recent years. C. chinensis var. brevisepala, the closest wild relative of C. chinensis var. chinensis, has a scattered distribution across southwestern China and is an important wild resource. Genetic diversity is associated with greater evolutionary potential and resilience of species or populations and is important for the breeding and conservation of species. Here, we conducted multiplexed massively parallel sequencing of the plastomes of 227 accessions of wild and cultivated C. chinensis using 111 marker pairs to study patterns of genetic diversity, population structure, and phylogeography among wild and cultivated C. chinensis populations. Wild and cultivated resources diverged approximately 2.83 Mya. The cultivated resources experienced a severe genetic bottleneck and possess highly mixed germplasm. However, high genetic diversity has been retained in the wild resources, and subpopulations in different locations differed in genotype composition. The significant divergence in the genetic diversity of wild and cultivated resources indicates that they require different conservation strategies. Wild resources require in situ conservation strategies aiming to expand population sizes while maintaining levels of genetic diversity; by contrast, germplasm resource nurseries with genotypes of cultivated resources and planned distribution measures are needed for the conservation of cultivated resources to prevent cultivated populations from undergoing severe genetic bottlenecks. The results of this study provide comprehensive insights into the genetic diversity, population structure, and phylogeography of C. chinensis and will facilitate future breeding and conservation efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Coptis chinensis; genetic diversity; massively parallel sequencing; phylogeography; plastome; population structure; wild and cultivated
Year: 2022 PMID: 35873994 PMCID: PMC9302112 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.923600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
FIGURE 1Gene maps of the plastids of C. chinensis and C. deltoidea. The genes are color-coded based on their functions. The dashed area indicates the GC composition of the plastid.
Chloroplast genome diversity of C. chinensis populations.
| Population | Number of accessions | Aligned length | Variable sites | Nucleotide diversity (Pi) | Number of Hap | Hap diversity | Number of indels |
| Ccc | 10 | 155,034 bp | 107 | 0.00026 | 5 | 0.822 | 58 |
| Ccb | 12 | 155,198 bp | 596 | 0.00137 | 7 | 0.924 | 222 |
| Total | 22 | 155,489 bp | 926 | 0.00197 | 12 | 0.952 | 334 |
FIGURE 2Circos plot showing the indel and nucleotide diversity of wild and cultivated C. chinensis. The concentric circles from outer to inner indicate the following: quadripartite structure of the plastid represented by different colors; the indels of Ccb; the indels of Ccc; the nucleotide diversity of Ccb; and the nucleotide diversity of Ccc. All statistics were computed for windows of 500 bp. In the Ccb population, Pi varied from 0 to 0.01442, and the average Pi was 0.00137. In the Ccc population, Pi ranged from 0 to 0.00569, and the average Pi was extremely low (approximately 0.00026).
FIGURE 3Divergence time estimation based on the plastids of Coptis. Numbers above and under the branches indicate the mean divergence times and 95% confidence interval of each node, respectively. Green bars indicate the 95% highest posterior density intervals. Divergence time and the timeline are indicated in million years ago (Mya).
FIGURE 4Population structure of C. chinensis populations. (A) Geographic distribution of the sampling locations. The map plot was generated using an R package (https://github.com/linhesun/bilibiliRlearning/tree/master/2021_r21_china_map). (B) PCA of wild and cultivated populations; the proportion of the variance explained was 15.34% for PC1 and 4.81% for PC2. (C) STRUCTURE analysis for K = 2–4. Colors indicate different clusters. The x-axis shows the subpopulations, and the y-axis indicates the probability of inferred ancestral lineages.
FIGURE 5Pairwise Fst values among 11 subpopulations of C. chinensis. The letters on the diagonal represent 11 subpopulations of C. chinensis. Below the diagonal, the number in the box is the pairwise Fst value between a vertical subpopulation and a horizontal subpopulation. Above the diagonal, pairwise Fst value is reflected by area and color of the square. The higher the Fst value is, the larger the colored area is. The color referring to the Fst value range is indicated in the column chart on the far right. The P-value is the probability calculated via significance test. ** indicates P < 0.01, *** indicates P < 0.001.
Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) of Ccc and Ccb.
| Group | Source of variation | Percentage of variation (%) |
| Ccc | Among populations | 4.94 |
| Within populations | 95.05 | |
| Ccb | Among populations | 80.87 |
| Within populations | 19.13 |
*P < 0.01 and **P < 0.001.
FIGURE 6TCS network for all 227 accessions based on 25,197 cpDNA fragments. Circle size is proportional to haplotype frequency. Different colors indicate different subpopulations from different distributions, and missing haplotypes are indicated by black dots. Mutational steps are indicated by hatchures (if the number of steps is less than 20) and number (if the number of steps is greater than 20).