Literature DB >> 29792940

A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Brian C Clark1, David W Russ2, Masato Nakazawa3, Christopher R France4, Stevan Walkowski5, Timothy D Law6, Megan Applegate2, Niladri Mahato3, Samuel Lietkam2, James Odenthal7, Daniel Corcos8, Simeon Hain5, Betty Sindelar2, Robert J Ploutz-Snyder9, James S Thomas10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care. Manipulative therapies are a common treatment for LBP. Few studies have compared the effectiveness of different types of manipulative therapies. Moreover, the physiologic mechanisms underlying these treatments are not fully understood. Herein, we present the study protocol for The Researching the Effectiveness of Lumbar Interventions for Enhancing Function Study (The RELIEF Study). METHODS AND STUDY
DESIGN: The RELIEF Study is a Phase II RCT with a nested mechanistic design. It is a single-blinded, sham-controlled study to test the mechanisms and effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques applied to individuals (n = 162; 18-45 years of age) with chronic LBP. The clinical outcome data from the mechanistic component will be pooled across experiments to permit an exploratory Phase II RCT investigating the effectiveness. Participants will be randomized into one of three separate experiments that constitute the mechanistic component to determine the muscular, spinal, and cortical effects of manual therapies. Within each of these experimental groups study participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms: 1) spinal manipulation, 2) spinal mobilization, or 3) sham laser therapy. Treatments will be delivered twice per week for 3-weeks. DISCUSSION: This data from this will shed light on the mechanisms underlying popular treatments for LBP. Additionally, the coupling of this basic science work in the context of a clinical trial will also permit examination of the clinical efficacy of two different types of manipulative therapies.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Manual therapies; Mobilization; Muscle energy; Spinal manipulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29792940      PMCID: PMC5994203          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  72 in total

1.  Effect of movement speed on limb segment motions for reaching from a standing position.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Daniel M Corcos; Ziaul Hasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Early Physical Therapy vs Usual Care in Patients With Recent-Onset Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; John S Magel; Molly McFadden; Carl Asche; Anne Thackeray; Whitney Meier; Gerard Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Responses of mechanosensitive afferents to manipulation of the lumbar facet in the cat.

Authors:  J G Pickar; R F McLain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Studying the natural history of back pain.

Authors:  M Von Korff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A randomized clinical trial comparing chiropractic adjustments to muscle relaxants for subacute low back pain.

Authors:  Kathryn T Hoiriis; Bruce Pfleger; Frederic C McDuffie; George Cotsonis; Omar Elsangak; Roger Hinson; Gregoria T Verzosa
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Manipulation and pain tolerance. A controlled study of the effect of spinal manipulation on paraspinal cutaneous pain tolerance levels.

Authors:  A C Terrett; H Vernon
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1984-10

8.  A randomized trial of medical care with and without physical therapy and chiropractic care with and without physical modalities for patients with low back pain: 6-month follow-up outcomes from the UCLA low back pain study.

Authors:  Eric L Hurwitz; Hal Morgenstern; Philip Harber; Gerald F Kominski; Thomas R Belin; Fei Yu; Alan H Adams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neil M Paige; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Marika Suttorp Booth; Jessica M Beroes; Aram S Mardian; Paul Dougherty; Richard Branson; Baron Tang; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Richard Deyo; Janna Friedly; Andrea Skelly; Robin Hashimoto; Melissa Weimer; Rochelle Fu; Tracy Dana; Paul Kraegel; Jessica Griffin; Sara Grusing; Erika D Brodt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of yoga and dynamic neuromuscular stabilization exercise in chronic low back pain on magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar multifidus- protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Prem Venkatesan; Soundararajan K; Thomas J Kishen; Seema Janardhan; Sathish Kumar Cr
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  Effectiveness of a theory-based back care intervention on spine-related behavior among pupils: a school-based randomised controlled trial (T-Bak study).

Authors:  Zahra Akbari-Chehrehbargh; Sedigheh Sadat Tavafian; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Agreement Analysis between Vive and Vicon Systems to Monitor Lumbar Postural Changes.

Authors:  Susanne M van der Veen; Martine Bordeleau; Peter E Pidcoe; Chris R France; James S Thomas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Comparative study of muscle energy technique, craniosacral therapy, and sensorimotor training effects on postural control in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Cobra Ghasemi; Ali Amiri; Javad Sarrafzadeh; Mehdi Dadgoo; Hasan Jafari
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

5.  Effect of Spinal Manipulative and Mobilization Therapies in Young Adults With Mild to Moderate Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Christopher R France; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Daniel M Corcos
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.