Brian C Clark1, David W Russ2, Masato Nakazawa3, Christopher R France4, Stevan Walkowski5, Timothy D Law6, Megan Applegate2, Niladri Mahato3, Samuel Lietkam2, James Odenthal7, Daniel Corcos8, Simeon Hain5, Betty Sindelar2, Robert J Ploutz-Snyder9, James S Thomas10. 1. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. Electronic address: Clarkb2@ohio.edu. 2. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Division of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. 3. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. 4. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. 5. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. 6. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Department of Family Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. 7. Division of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. 8. Department of Physical Therapy & Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States. 9. Applied Biostatistics Laboratory, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 10. Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute (OMNI), Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States; Division of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, United States. Electronic address: thomasj5@ohio.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care. Manipulative therapies are a common treatment for LBP. Few studies have compared the effectiveness of different types of manipulative therapies. Moreover, the physiologic mechanisms underlying these treatments are not fully understood. Herein, we present the study protocol for The Researching the Effectiveness of Lumbar Interventions for Enhancing Function Study (The RELIEF Study). METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The RELIEF Study is a Phase II RCT with a nested mechanistic design. It is a single-blinded, sham-controlled study to test the mechanisms and effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques applied to individuals (n = 162; 18-45 years of age) with chronic LBP. The clinical outcome data from the mechanistic component will be pooled across experiments to permit an exploratory Phase II RCT investigating the effectiveness. Participants will be randomized into one of three separate experiments that constitute the mechanistic component to determine the muscular, spinal, and cortical effects of manual therapies. Within each of these experimental groups study participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms: 1) spinal manipulation, 2) spinal mobilization, or 3) sham laser therapy. Treatments will be delivered twice per week for 3-weeks. DISCUSSION: This data from this will shed light on the mechanisms underlying popular treatments for LBP. Additionally, the coupling of this basic science work in the context of a clinical trial will also permit examination of the clinical efficacy of two different types of manipulative therapies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care. Manipulative therapies are a common treatment for LBP. Few studies have compared the effectiveness of different types of manipulative therapies. Moreover, the physiologic mechanisms underlying these treatments are not fully understood. Herein, we present the study protocol for The Researching the Effectiveness of Lumbar Interventions for Enhancing Function Study (The RELIEF Study). METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The RELIEF Study is a Phase II RCT with a nested mechanistic design. It is a single-blinded, sham-controlled study to test the mechanisms and effectiveness of two manual therapy techniques applied to individuals (n = 162; 18-45 years of age) with chronic LBP. The clinical outcome data from the mechanistic component will be pooled across experiments to permit an exploratory Phase II RCT investigating the effectiveness. Participants will be randomized into one of three separate experiments that constitute the mechanistic component to determine the muscular, spinal, and cortical effects of manual therapies. Within each of these experimental groups study participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment arms: 1) spinal manipulation, 2) spinal mobilization, or 3) sham laser therapy. Treatments will be delivered twice per week for 3-weeks. DISCUSSION: This data from this will shed light on the mechanisms underlying popular treatments for LBP. Additionally, the coupling of this basic science work in the context of a clinical trial will also permit examination of the clinical efficacy of two different types of manipulative therapies.
Authors: Julie M Fritz; John S Magel; Molly McFadden; Carl Asche; Anne Thackeray; Whitney Meier; Gerard Brennan Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kathryn T Hoiriis; Bruce Pfleger; Frederic C McDuffie; George Cotsonis; Omar Elsangak; Roger Hinson; Gregoria T Verzosa Journal: J Manipulative Physiol Ther Date: 2004 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Eric L Hurwitz; Hal Morgenstern; Philip Harber; Gerald F Kominski; Thomas R Belin; Fei Yu; Alan H Adams Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Neil M Paige; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Marika Suttorp Booth; Jessica M Beroes; Aram S Mardian; Paul Dougherty; Richard Branson; Baron Tang; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roger Chou; Richard Deyo; Janna Friedly; Andrea Skelly; Robin Hashimoto; Melissa Weimer; Rochelle Fu; Tracy Dana; Paul Kraegel; Jessica Griffin; Sara Grusing; Erika D Brodt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Susanne M van der Veen; Martine Bordeleau; Peter E Pidcoe; Chris R France; James S Thomas Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2019-08-21 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: James S Thomas; Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Christopher R France; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Daniel M Corcos Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-08-03