Literature DB >> 12541148

Effect of movement speed on limb segment motions for reaching from a standing position.

James S Thomas1, Daniel M Corcos, Ziaul Hasan.   

Abstract

The performance of a standing reaching task that necessitates some forward bending requires: (1) the coordination of multiple joints (i.e., the trunk and limb segments) to reach the target, and (2) the preservation of postural stability. It has been proposed that the neural control of multijoint reaching tasks can be simplified by time scaling of joint motions while keeping joint excursions the same. To determine if time scaling of joint motions was used in this more complex reaching task, we had 20 healthy subjects (10 male and 10 female) reach for two targets located in a parasagittal plane while standing on a force platform. Subjects reached for the targets at a comfortable speed and a fast paced speed. Sagittal plane motions of the right shank, thigh, pelvis, trunk, humerus, and forearm were measured. At the fast paced movement speeds subjects had significantly larger excursions of the thigh, pelvis, humerus, and forearm compared to the comfortable speed. Thus, segment motions are not simply time scaled for standing multijoint reaches. We explored three possible reasons for not obeying time scaling: (1) to reduce scaling of peak kinetic energy, (2) to reduce scaling of peak horizontal ground reaction force, and (3) a convergence of movement strategies at faster speeds. While subjects modified their movement strategy in relationship to movement speed, these changes had no significant effect on the expected scaling of peak kinetic energy, or peak horizontal ground reaction forces. Given the intersubject differences in movement strategies used to perform these reaching tasks at the fast speeds, a convergence of movement strategies was ruled out. We propose that the increase in segment motions with speed may be a consequence of rules underlying motor output, the increases being greater for segments in which viscoelastic resistance to movement is more significant compared to inertial resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12541148     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1287-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  Stability of dynamic trunk movement.

Authors:  Kevin P Granata; Scott A England
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Coordination and timing of spine and hip joints during full body reaching tasks.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Gary E Gibson
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Motor equivalence and self-motion induced by different movement speeds.

Authors:  J P Scholz; T Dwight-Higgin; J E Lynch; Y W Tseng; V Martin; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Masato Nakazawa; Christopher R France; Stevan Walkowski; Timothy D Law; Megan Applegate; Niladri Mahato; Samuel Lietkam; James Odenthal; Daniel Corcos; Simeon Hain; Betty Sindelar; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; James S Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  A mathematical tool to generate complex whole body motor tasks and test hypotheses on underlying motor planning.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Thierry Pozzo; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence.

Authors:  D J S Mattos; M L Latash; E Park; J Kuhl; J P Scholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics.

Authors:  Silvia Hua; Julia A Leonard; Alicia J Hilderley; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Resolving kinematic redundancy in target-reaching movements with and without external constraint.

Authors:  Dongpyo Lee; Daniel M Corcos; Jonathan Shemmell; Sue Leurgans; Ziaul Hasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of Real-World Versus Virtual Environments on Joint Excursions in Full-Body Reaching Tasks.

Authors:  James S Thomas; Christopher R France; Samuel T Leitkam; Megan E Applegate; Peter E Pidcoe; Stevan Walkowski
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.316

10.  Gait analysis to classify external load conditions using linear discriminant analysis.

Authors:  Minhyung Lee; Michael Roan; Benjamin Smith; Thurmon E Lockhart
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.