Literature DB >> 8578387

Responses of mechanosensitive afferents to manipulation of the lumbar facet in the cat.

J G Pickar1, R F McLain.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The response of mechanosensitive afferent nerve endings in the lumbar spine to manipulation of a lumbar facet isolated using a unique surgical approach was studied in anesthetized adult cats.
OBJECTIVES: To characterize sensory nerve endings in the lumbar spine with respect to their receptive field and conduction velocity and to assess their response to facet joint motion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have identified the presence of encapsulated endings in normal human facet capsules and have documented the presence of mechanosensitive units responsive to spinal loading. Previous neurophysiologic studies have used preparations that stripped all paraspinous musculature away from the field to expose the facets and lamina.
METHODS: A unique hemilaminectomy approach was developed that permitted physiologic loading of the lumbar facet without disturbing its overlying musculature. Recordings of single unit afferent activity were made from fine filaments teased from the L6 dorsal root. Response to L5-L6 facet motion was studied by applying cranial, craniomedial, and medial distractive forces and lateral compressive forces to the facet joint.
RESULTS: Single unit recordings were obtained from 16 afferents with receptive fields in the lumbar spine. Seven of 16 afferents had receptive fields in or near the facet, and the remaining nine afferents had receptive fields in paraspinal tissues some distance from the facet joint. There were nine Group II afferents, three Group IV, and four unclassified afferents. The majority of endings responded in a graded fashion relative to the direction of force applied.
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanosensitive endings in the lumbar spine show graded sensitivity to the direction of facet manipulation. These Group III and IV afferents can reside some distance from the facet joint and remain sensitive to facet motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8578387     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199511001-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  An anatomical investigation of the human cervical facet capsule, quantifying muscle insertion area.

Authors:  B A Winkelstein; R E McLendon; A Barbir; B S Myers
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Development of an in vivo method to investigate biomechanical and neurophysiological properties of spine facet joint capsules.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Chaoyang Chen; Srinivasu Kallakuri; Ajit Patwardhan; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Material properties of the human lumbar facet joint capsule.

Authors:  Jesse S Little; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Tensile stretching of cervical facet joint capsule and related axonal changes.

Authors:  Srinivasu Kallakuri; Anita Singh; Ying Lu; Chaoyang Chen; Ajit Patwardhan; John M Cavanaugh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Masato Nakazawa; Christopher R France; Stevan Walkowski; Timothy D Law; Megan Applegate; Niladri Mahato; Samuel Lietkam; James Odenthal; Daniel Corcos; Simeon Hain; Betty Sindelar; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; James S Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Encapsulated Ruffini-like endings in human lumbar facet joints.

Authors:  F Vandenabeele; J Creemers; I Lambrichts; P Lippens; M Jans
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Validation of the cat as a model for the human lumbar spine during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Joel G Pickar; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Spinal Manipulation Vs Sham Manipulation for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jay K Ruddock; Hannah Sallis; Andy Ness; Rachel E Perry
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

10.  Determination of torque-limits for human and cat lumbar spine specimens during displacement-controlled physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Joel G Pickar; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.