Literature DB >> 26461996

Early Physical Therapy vs Usual Care in Patients With Recent-Onset Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Julie M Fritz1, John S Magel2, Molly McFadden1, Carl Asche3, Anne Thackeray2, Whitney Meier1, Gerard Brennan4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Low back pain (LBP) is common in primary care. Guidelines recommend delaying referrals for physical therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether early physical therapy (manipulation and exercise) is more effective than usual care in improving disability for patients with LBP fitting a decision rule. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized clinical trial with 220 participants recruited between March 2011 and November 2013. Participants with no LBP treatment in the past 6 months, aged 18 through 60 years (mean age, 37.4 years [SD, 10.3]), an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of 20 or higher, symptom duration less than 16 days, and no symptoms distal to the knee in the past 72 hours were enrolled following a primary care visit.
INTERVENTIONS: All participants received education. Early physical therapy (n = 108) consisted of 4 physical therapy sessions. Usual care (n = 112) involved no additional interventions during the first 4 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was change in the ODI score (range: 0-100; higher scores indicate greater disability; minimum clinically important difference, 6 points) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in the ODI score at 4-week and 1-year follow-up, and change in pain intensity, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) score, fear-avoidance beliefs, quality of life, patient-reported success, and health care utilization at 4-week, 3-month, and 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: One-year follow-up was completed by 207 participants (94.1%). Using analysis of covariance, early physical therapy showed improvement relative to usual care in disability after 3 months (mean ODI score: early physical therapy group, 41.3 [95% CI, 38.7 to 44.0] at baseline to 6.6 [95% CI, 4.7 to 8.5] at 3 months; usual care group, 40.9 [95% CI, 38.6 to 43.1] at baseline to 9.8 [95% CI, 7.9 to 11.7] at 3 months; between-group difference, -3.2 [95% CI, -5.9 to -0.47], P = .02). A significant difference was found between groups for the ODI score after 4 weeks (between-group difference, -3.5 [95% CI, -6.8 to -0.08], P = .045]), but not at 1-year follow-up (between-group difference, -2.0 [95% CI, -5.0 to 1.0], P = .19). There was no improvement in pain intensity at 4-week, 3-month, or 1-year follow-up (between-group difference, -0.42 [95% CI, -0.90 to 0.02] at 4-week follow-up; -0.38 [95% CI, -0.84 to 0.09] at 3-month follow-up; and -0.17 [95% CI, -0.62 to 0.27] at 1-year follow-up). The PCS scores improved at 4 weeks and 3 months but not at 1-year follow-up (between-group difference, -2.7 [95% CI, -4.6 to -0.85] at 4-week follow-up; -2.2 [95% CI, -3.9 to -0.49] at 3-month follow-up; and -0.92 [95% CI, -2.7 to 0.61] at 1-year follow-up). There were no differences in health care utilization at any point. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among adults with recent-onset LBP, early physical therapy resulted in statistically significant improvement in disability, but the improvement was modest and did not achieve the minimum clinically important difference compared with usual care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01726803.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26461996     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.11648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  35 in total

1.  Value-Based Care for Musculoskeletal Pain: Are Physical Therapists Ready to Deliver?

Authors:  Trevor A Lentz; Adam P Goode; Charles A Thigpen; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04-17

2.  A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David W Russ; Masato Nakazawa; Christopher R France; Stevan Walkowski; Timothy D Law; Megan Applegate; Niladri Mahato; Samuel Lietkam; James Odenthal; Daniel Corcos; Simeon Hain; Betty Sindelar; Robert J Ploutz-Snyder; James S Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; John E Kuhn; William D Murrell; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Evidence-Based Evaluation of Complementary Health Approaches for Pain Management in the United States.

Authors:  Richard L Nahin; Robin Boineau; Partap S Khalsa; Barbara J Stussman; Wendy J Weber
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Pain and functional outcomes after outpatient physiotherapy in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Martin Alfuth; Dieter W Welsink
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Outcomes of Patients With Acute Low Back Pain Stratified by the STarT Back Screening Tool: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  John Magel; Julie M Fritz; Tom Greene; Per Kjaer; Robin L Marcus; Gerard P Brennan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2017-03-01

7.  The association between depression and type of treatments received for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Max Zubatsky; Matthew Witthaus; Jeffrey F Scherrer; Joanne Salas; Sarah Gebauer; Sandra Burge; F David Schneider
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Associations of Early Treatments for Low-Back Pain with Military Readiness Outcomes.

Authors:  Mary Jo Larson; Rachel Sayko Adams; Grant A Ritter; Andrea Linton; Thomas V Williams; Mayada Saadoun; Mark R Bauer
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.579

Review 9.  Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Neil M Paige; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Marika Suttorp Booth; Jessica M Beroes; Aram S Mardian; Paul Dougherty; Richard Branson; Baron Tang; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Outpatient Physical Therapy Use Following Tibial Fractures: A Retrospective Commercial Claims Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin H McLaughlin; Lisa M Reider; Renan C Castillo; James R Ficke; Joseph F Levy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.