Literature DB >> 29788284

Military Service and Decision Quality in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.

Eric R Henderson1,2,3, Alexander J Titus4, Benjamin J Keeney2,3,5, Philip P Goodney3,6,7, Jon D Lurie2,3,7, Said A Ibrahim8.   

Abstract

Background: Decision quality measures the degree to which care decisions are knowledge-based and value-aligned. Because military service emphasizes hierarchy, command, and mandates some healthcare decisions, military service may attenuate patient autonomy in healthcare decisions and lower decision quality. VA is the nation's largest provider of orthopedic care. We compared decision quality in a sample of VA and non-VA patients seeking care for knee osteoarthritis.
Methods: Our study sample consisted of patients newly referred to our orthopedic clinic for the management of knee osteoarthritis. None of the study patients were exposed to a knee osteoarthritis decision aid. Consenting patients were administered the Hip/Knee Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI). In addition, they were surveyed about decision-making preferences and demographics. We compared results to a non-VA cohort from our academic institution's arthroplasty database.
Results: The HK-DQI Knowledge Score was lower in the VA cohort (45%, SD = 22, n = 25) compared with the non-VA cohort (53%, SD = 21, n = 177) (p = 0.04). The Concordance Score was lower in the VA cohort (36%, SD = 49%) compared with the control cohort (70%, SD 46%) (p = 0.003). Non-VA patients were more likely to make a high-quality decision (p = 0.05). Non-VA patients were more likely to favor a shared decision-making process (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Decision quality is lower in Veterans with knee osteoarthritis compared with civilians, placing them at risk for lower treatment satisfaction and possibly unwarranted surgical utilization. Our future work will examine if this difference is from conditioned military service behaviors or confounding demographic factors, and if conventional shared decision-making techniques will correct this deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29788284      PMCID: PMC6544873          DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  21 in total

1.  Shared decision-making and the orthopaedic workforce.

Authors:  J D Lurie; J N Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Floyd J Fowler; Albert G Mulley
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials.

Authors:  Simon J Griffin; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Marijcke W M Veltman; Susan Gillard; Julie Grant; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Medical ethics at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib: the problem of dual loyalty.

Authors:  Peter A Clark
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette O'Connor; Dawn Stacey; Robert Volk; Adrian Edwards; Angela Coulter; Richard Thomson; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Barry; Steven Bernstein; Phyllis Butow; Aileen Clarke; Vikki Entwistle; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Nora Moumjid; Al Mulley; Cornelia Ruland; Karen Sepucha; Alan Sykes; Tim Whelan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-08-14

8.  Can patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making regarding the use of medicines be predicted?

Authors:  S Garfield; F Smith; S A Francis; C Chalmers
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-02-27

9.  Development of a decision aid to address racial disparities in utilization of knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Haoling H Weng; Robert M Kaplan; W John Boscardin; Catherine H Maclean; Irene Y Lee; Weiling Chen; John D Fitzgerald
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-05-15

Review 10.  Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

View more
  1 in total

1.  Duration of military service is associated with decision quality in Veterans considering total knee replacement: case series.

Authors:  Matthew J Sabatino; Clifford A Reilly; Samuel T Kunkel; Alexander J Titus; Dipak B Ramkumar; Philip P Goodney; Said A Ibrahim; Jonathan D Lurie; Eric R Henderson
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2019-07-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.