Literature DB >> 15471770

Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids.

Annette M O'Connor1, Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas, Ann Barry Flood.   

Abstract

Shared decision making is the process of interacting with patients in arriving at informed values-based choices when options have features that patients value differently. Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are evidence-based tools designed to facilitate that process. Numerous randomized trials indicate that PtDAs improve decision quality and prevent overuse of options that informed patients do not value. Therefore, they have a potential role in reducing unwarranted variations in the use of preference-sensitive health care options. However, barriers to their widespread use need to be addressed with coherent plans for ensuring good standards, improving access to PtDAs, training practitioners, testing practice models, and launching demonstration projects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15471770     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  118 in total

Review 1.  Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary E Ropka; Jess Keim; John T Philbrick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Physicians' shared decision-making behaviors in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder care.

Authors:  William B Brinkman; Jessica Hartl; Lauren M Rawe; Heidi Sucharew; Maria T Britto; Jeffery N Epstein
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2011-11

3.  Shared decision-making and evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Jared R Adams; Robert E Drake
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2006-02

4.  The role of "evidence" in recovery from mental illness.

Authors:  Sandra J Tanenbaum
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2006-12

5.  Communication and decision making in cancer care: setting research priorities for decision support/patients' decision aids.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ellen M Peters; Laura Siminoff; E Dale Collins; Michael J Barry
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for 'benchmarks of efficiency'.

Authors:  Daniel Strech; Marion Danis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  When doctors disagree: a qualitative study of doctors' and parents' views on the risks of childhood food allergy.

Authors:  Wendy Hu; Carol Grbich; Andrew Kemp
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  What Is a "Good" Treatment Decision? Decisional Control, Knowledge, Treatment Decision Making, and Quality of Life in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Caitlin Biddle; Willie Underwood; Christian J Nelson; D Lynn Homish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  High deductible health plans: does cost sharing stimulate increased consumer sophistication?

Authors:  Neal Gupta; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.