| Literature DB >> 29783898 |
Alessio Mancini1,2, Giampaolo Esposto3, Silvana Manfrini4, Silvia Rilli4, Gessica Tinti4, Giuseppe Carta2, Laura Petrolati2, Matteo Vidali5, Simone Barocci2.
Abstract
The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the reliability and robustness of six glucose meters for point-of-care testing in our wards using a brand-new protocol. During a 30-days study period a total of 50 diabetes patients were subjected to venous blood sampling and glucose meter blood analysis. The results of six glucose meters were compared with our laboratory reference assay. GlucoMen Plus (Menarini) with the 82% of acceptable results was the most robust glucose meter. Even if the Passing-Bablok analysis demonstrates the presence of constant systematic errors and the Bland-Altman test highlighted a possible overestimation, the surveillance error grid analysis showed that this glucose meter can be used safely. We proved that portable glucose meters are not always reliable in routinely clinical settings.Entities:
Keywords: Bland-Altman; Passing-Bablok; blood glucose; diabetes; glycemic control; self-monitoring
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29783898 PMCID: PMC6134620 DOI: 10.1177/1932296818774077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol ISSN: 1932-2968