| Literature DB >> 29783751 |
Sophia Wedel1, Maria Manola2, Maria Cavinato3, Ioannis P Trougakos4, Pidder Jansen-Dürr5.
Abstract
Organismal ageing is associated with increased chance of morbidity or mortality and it is driven by diverse molecular pathways that are affected by both environmental and genetic factors. The progression of ageing correlates with the gradual accumulation of stressors and damaged biomolecules due to the time-dependent decline of stress resistance and functional capacity, which eventually compromise cellular homeodynamics. As protein machines carry out the majority of cellular functions, proteome quality control is critical for cellular functionality and is carried out through the curating activity of the proteostasis network (PN). Key components of the PN are the two main degradation machineries, namely the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome pathways along with several stress-responsive pathways, such as that of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which mobilises cytoprotective genomic responses against oxidative and/or xenobiotic damage. Reportedly, genetic or dietary interventions that activate components of the PN delay ageing in evolutionarily diverse organisms. Natural products (extracts or pure compounds) represent an extraordinary inventory of highly diverse structural scaffolds that offer promising activities towards meeting the challenge of increasing healthspan and/or delaying ageing (e.g., spermidine, quercetin or sulforaphane). Herein, we review those natural compounds that have been found to activate proteostatic and/or anti-stress cellular responses and hence have the potential to delay cellular senescence and/or in vivo ageing.Entities:
Keywords: Nrf2; autophagy; natural products; proteasome; proteostasis network
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29783751 PMCID: PMC6100286 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23051219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic presentation of the pathways known to modulate Nrf2 activity. Under basal conditions, Nrf2 is poly-ubiquitinated and targeted for proteasomal degradation. Oxidative stress modifies Keap1 leading to Nrf2 stabilization and nuclear translocation. In the nucleus, Nrf2 activates a wide range of transcriptional targets including antioxidant and proteostatic genes. The Nrf2 activity can be also modulated by upstream kinases (e.g., Akt or Gsk-3).
Figure 2Mechanisms of autophagy-induction. The mTORC1 complex is a central regulator of autophagy-initiation. If active, mTORC1 inhibits the ULK1 complex and its ability to recruit the Vps34 complex to the phagophore. The binding of the Vps34 complex is essential for lipidation of LC3, autophagosome formation, fusion and consequent cargo degradation. Cellular stressors (shown in grey), such as ER stress, increasing intracellular Ca2+ levels and the shift of energy levels (increase of the AMP:ATP ratio) influences autophagy initiation either upstream of mTORC1 or directly at the Vps34 complex. Other positive regulators of autophagy (shown in blue) include SIRT1 and TSC1/2 signalling. Negative regulators of autophagy (shown in red) comprise PI3K/Akt, STAT3/Bcl2, PKCδ and EP300.
Bifunctional natural compounds which influence proteasome activity and autophagy.
| Compound | Structure | Source | Model | Dose Used | Proposed Mechanism of Action | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resveratrol |
| Grape, nuts and peanuts | Male Wistar Periodontitis rats | 10 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response | [ |
| Diabetic rats | 20 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 nuclear translocation | [ | |||
| SH-SY5Y cells | 50 µM—24 h | AMPK | [ | |||
| SIRT1 | ||||||
| Various cancer cell lines | 50–100 µM—2–4 h | mTOR direct binding | [ | |||
| Metformin |
|
| Male C57BL/6 mice | 0.1% | ↑ Nrf2 expression | [ |
| HepG2 cells | 1.5 mM | ↑ Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response | ||||
|
| 50 mM | ↑ SKN-1 nuclear translocation in the intestine to promote SKN-1-dependent transcription | [ | |||
| Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma | 10 mM—48 h | AMPK | [ | |||
| STAT3/Bcl-2 | ||||||
| Curcumin |
|
| TRAMP C1 cells | 1, 2.5 μΜ | ↑ Nrf2 expression | [ |
|
| 20 mM | ↑ Nrf2-ARE binding | [ | |||
| Uterine leiomyosarcoma cells | 50 µM—48 h | Inhibitor of acetyltransferases | [ | |||
| Genistein |
| Soy products | Rat model of transient global cerebral ischemia | 1 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Modification of Keap1/Nrf2 nuclear translocation | [ |
| Ovarian cancer cells | 100 µM—24 h | PI3K-Akt | [ | |||
| MCF7 cells | 100 µM—72 h | [ | ||||
| Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) |
| Green tea | B lymphoblasts | 30 μΜ | ↑ PI3K/Akt | [ |
| Macrophage foam cells | 40 µg/mL | Increased Nrf2-Keap1 dissociation | [ | |||
| Osteoclast progenitor cells | 10 µM | ↑ Nrf2 nuclear translocation | [ | |||
| Human breast epithelial (MCF10A) cells | 100 μΜ | ↑ Nrf2 nuclear translocation, Nrf2-ARE binding and Nrf2 expression | [ | |||
| NZB/W F1 lupus-prone mice | 120 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response | [ | |||
| Human umbilical vein endothelial cells | 50–400 μΜ | ↑ Nrf2 and HO-1 expression | [ | |||
| Endothelial cells | 10 µM—4 h | AMPK | [ |
Natural products modulating Nrf2 and/or ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) activity.
| Compound | Structure | Source | Model | Dose Used | Proposed Mechanism of Action | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sulforaphane |
| Cruciferous vegetables | Human Keap1-transfected HEK293 cells | 5–20 μΜ | Modification of Keap1 | [ |
| TRAMP C1 cells | 1,2.5 μΜ | ↑ Nrf2 expression | ||||
| Mouse embryonic fibroblasts | 10 μM | ↑ Nrf2 expression | [ | |||
| Reserpine |
|
| Μouse skin epidermal JB6 P + cells | 2.5–10 μM | ↑ Nrf2 expression | [ |
| Andrographolide |
|
| Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO)-insulted rats | 0.1 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 and HO-1 expression | [ |
| Cinnamic aldehyde |
|
| Endothelial cells | 100 μM | ↑ Nrf2 and HO-1 expression | [ |
| Ηuman epithelial colon cells | 10 μΜ | ↑ Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response | [ | |||
| HepG2 cells | 100 μM | ↑ Nrf2 nuclear translocation | ||||
| STZ-induced diabetic mice (Nrf2+/+) | 20 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 expression | ||||
| Pterostilbene |
| Grapes and blueberries | Male BALB/c mice | 5 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 and HO-1 expression | [ |
| Tumor xenografts (nude mice) of HEK293T cells | 100, 200 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 expression | [ | |||
| INS-1E cells | 2–16 μM | ↑ Nrf2 activation and expression | ||||
| Oleuropein |
| Human embryonic fibroblasts | 0.5 μg/mL | ↑ In vitro proteasome activities | [ | |
| ↑ Resistance to oxidative stress and cellular lifespan | ||||||
| Osthole |
|
| Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis mice | 30 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response | [ |
| C57 BL/6J mice | 100 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 protein levels | [ | |||
| Rosmarinic (carnosic) acid |
| Mouse model of isoproterenol (ISO)-induced myocardial stress | 50, 100 mg/kg B.W. | ↑ Nrf2 nuclear translocation | [ | |
|
| 200 μΜ | ↑ Nrf2 mediated antioxidant response | [ |
Plant extracts and natural compounds activating autophagy.
| Compound | Structure | Source | Model | Dose | Proposed Mechanism of Action | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spermidine |
| numerous | U2OS, PC12 (rat pheochromocytoma cells) | 100 µM—4 h | Inhibitor of acetyltransferases | [ |
| 1 mM—1 h | Blocks Beclin-1 cleavage | |||||
| Quercetin |
| numerous | Primary effusion lymphoma cells | 50 µM—24 h | mTOR inhibitor | [ |
| Downregulation of anti-autophagic proteins | ||||||
| Rottlerin |
|
| Pancreatic cancer stem cells | 2 µM—24 h | mTOR inhibitor | [ |
| PKCδ inhibitor | ||||||
| Anacardic acid |
|
| U2OS, neuroglioma cells, MEF | 50 µM—24 h | ER-stress induction | [ |
| Akt | ||||||
| Inhibitor of acetyltransferases | ||||||
| Catechins |
|
| Endothelial cells | 10 µM—4 h | AMPK | [ |
Figure 3Natural compounds driving autophagy initiation. Plant-derived compounds (shown in yellow) induce autophagy by influencing cellular stressors (shown in grey); by activating positive regulators (shown in blue), or by repressing negative regulators (shown in red) of autophagy.