Literature DB >> 29781910

Superior Baseplate Inclination Is Associated With Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Robert Z Tashjian1, Brook I Martin, Cassandra A Ricketts, Heath B Henninger, Erin K Granger, Peter N Chalmers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Instability is the most common complication after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). In the native glenohumeral joint, in addition to full dislocations, more subtle forms of instability exist. However, the incidence of more subtle forms of instability, the factors associated with instability, and the effect of instability on validated outcome scores after rTSA remain poorly understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After rTSA, what is the risk of instability, including more subtle forms of subjective instability? (2) What are the factors associated with instability? (3) Are more subtle forms of instability associated with lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) functional outcome scores than those patients without instability?
METHODS: A total of 168 rTSAs were performed during the study period. Six patients had died at the time of study initiation. Thirty patients were excluded, nine because rTSA was performed for an acute proximal humeral fracture, one because a lateralized humeral component was used, 17 because a retaining liner was used, and three because a lateralized glenosphere was used. One hundred thirty-two patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-five patients were lost to followup. Thus, 97 patients with a minimum of 2 years followup were included in the final cohort (74% of included patients). Followup was 47 ± 22 months (mean ± SD). The cohort included 23 men and 74 women with an age of 70 ± 9 years who underwent 78 primary and 19 revision rTSAs. Primary and revision patients were combined for subsequent analyses. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess instability symptoms. Although it has not been validated, it is simple and we believe has high face validity. Briefly, it scored instability as (1) none; (2) feelings of instability; (3) probable dislocation/subluxation-self-reduced; and (4) dislocation with surgical reduction or dislocation with closed reduction (such as in the emergency department or the doctor's office). ASES scores were collected specifically for this study. The preoperative and postoperative β angle was measured to determine glenoid inclination. Larger β angles denote more superior inclination, whereas smaller β angles denote more inferior inclination. Thus, a positive change in β angle from preoperatively to postoperatively denotes a change into more superior inclination, whereas a negative change in β angle from preoperatively to postoperatively denotes a change into more inferior inclination. Associations between instability symptoms and patient, implant, and surgical factors were evaluated in a multivariate model that considered age, sex, body mass index, and whether it was a primary or a revision procedure.
RESULTS: A total of 13 of 97 (13%) patients reported some instability (Grades 2-4); four of 97 patients (4%) had full dislocations with reduction (Grade 4), four of 97 patients (4%) reported subluxations (Grade 3), and five of 97 patients (5%) reported feelings of instability or apprehension (Grade 2). After controlling for potential confounding variables like age, sex, body mass index, and revision versus primary procedure, the only factors associated with instability were greater superior baseplate inclination (larger β angle; odds ratio [OR], 1.15 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.042-1.258]; p = 0.005) and a greater change into superior inclination from preoperative to postoperative (greater positive change in ß angle; OR, 1.08 [1.009-1.165]; p = 0.027). Patients with any instability (Grades 2-4) reported lower final ASES scores than did patients without instability (Grade 1) (61 ± 16 versus 72 ± 19 mean difference 11 [95% CI, 0-22]; p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: When more subtle instability after rTSA is included, instability may occur in up to 13% of patients. Instability is associated with greater superior baseplate inclination and less inferior correction of the β angle and thus surgeons should consider inferiorly inclining the baseplate to avoid postoperative instability. Although our study only demonstrates an association and not causation, the authors hypothesize that superior baseplate inclination increases inferior impingement, which leads to instability. Instability negatively influences final ASES score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29781910      PMCID: PMC6259729          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  27 in total

1.  Early dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Zain Rahman; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Matthew Walker; Matthew Willis; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Do the indications, results, and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty change with surgeon's experience?

Authors:  Gilles Walch; Guillaume Bacle; Alexandre Lädermann; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Christopher John Smithers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Complication rates, dislocation, pain, and postoperative range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with and without repair of the subscapularis.

Authors:  Jason C Clark; Joseph Ritchie; Frederick S Song; Michael J Kissenberth; Stefan J Tolan; Nathan D Hart; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Biomechanical effects of humeral neck-shaft angle and subscapularis integrity in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joo Han Oh; Sang-Jin Shin; Michelle H McGarry; Jonathan H Scott; Nathanael Heckmann; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Current pain prescribing habits for common shoulder operations: a survey of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons membership.

Authors:  K Linnea Welton; Matthew J Kraeutler; Eric C McCarty; Armando F Vidal; Jonathan T Bravman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  Anterior stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and rotator cuff condition.

Authors:  Marc-Frederic Pastor; Manuel Kraemer; Mathias Wellmann; Christof Hurschler; Tomas Smith
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Subscapularis insufficiency and the risk of shoulder dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; Matthew D Williams; Joanne E Labriola; Hussein A Elkousy; Gary M Gartsman; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders.

Authors:  F Sirveaux; L Favard; D Oudet; D Huquet; G Walch; D Molé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

10.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a review of results according to etiology.

Authors:  Bryan Wall; Laurent Nové-Josserand; Daniel P O'Connor; T Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  10 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Superior Baseplate Inclination Is Associated With Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Implant Design Considerations.

Authors:  Ujash Sheth; Matthew Saltzman
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Tomographic Analysis of Positioning of Reverse Baseplates Positioning.

Authors:  Alexandre Almeida; Daniel C Agostini; Pietro Ft Nesello; Nayvaldo C de Almeida; Rafael Mioso; Ana Paula Agostini
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-02-15

4.  Dislocation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary medialized modular systems. Can we still consider it such a frequent complication?

Authors:  Carlos Garcia-Fernandez; Yaiza Lopiz; Camilla Arvinius; Virginia Ponz; Borja Alcobía-Diaz; Pablo Checa; Maria Galán-Olleros; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-09-30

5.  Preoperative three-dimensional computer planning for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and bone grafting for severe glenoid deformity.

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Lindsay Beck; Irene Stertz; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-03-13

Review 6.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

Review 7.  Mechanical complications and fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty related to different design types and their rates: part I.

Authors:  Marko Nabergoj; Patrick J Denard; Philippe Collin; Rihard Trebše; Alexandre Lädermann
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19

8.  Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Robert Z Tashjian; Bradley Hillyard; Victoria Childress; Jun Kawakami; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Peter N Chalmers
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Early functional recovery after two-stage surgery with an allogenic bone graft for baseplate loosening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Mitsuko Yamada; Shinichi Kato; Kazuaki Mito; Atsuo Furui; Osamu Niwa; Nobuki Terada
Journal:  Fujita Med J       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 10.  The Evolution of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty-From the First Steps to Novel Implant Designs and Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Julia K Frank; Paul Siegert; Fabian Plachel; Philipp R Heuberer; Stephanie Huber; Jakob E Schanda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.