| Literature DB >> 29776897 |
Laura Saez1, Johanne Langlois1,2, Karine Legrand1,3, Marie-Hélène Quinet4, Edith Lecomte2, Abdou Y Omorou1,3, Serge Briançon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although information and communication technology interventions appear to be a promising means of reducing the health inequality gap in overweight and obesity prevention, research on information and communication technology interventions is lacking outside the Anglo-Saxon world.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent; overweight; social media; socioeconomic factors; text messaging; weight loss
Year: 2018 PMID: 29776897 PMCID: PMC5984273 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ISSN: 2291-5222 Impact factor: 4.773
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study sample (N=262).
| Characteristics | Statistics | |
| Age in years, mean (SD) | 15.4 (0.8) | |
| Boys | 114 (43.5) | |
| Girls | 148 (56.5) | |
| No | 198 (75.6) | |
| Yes | 64 (24.4) | |
| Very low FAS (1-2) | 22 (8.4) | |
| Low FAS (3-4) | 123 (46.9) | |
| Average FAS (5) | 117 (44.7) | |
| Vocational high school | 117 (44.7) | |
| General high school | 91 (34.7) | |
| Middle school | 54 (20.6) | |
| Nonboarder | 63 (24.4) | |
| Half-boarder | 130 (50.4) | |
| Full boarder | 65 (25.2) | |
| Two-parents | 200 (76.3) | |
| Single parent | 51 (19.5) | |
| Other | 11 (4.2) | |
| Written parental consent | 47 (17.9) | |
| Tacit parental consent | 215 (82.1) | |
aFAS: Family Affluence Scale.
Figure 1Flowchart describing rates of access, participation, and appreciation for the Facebook intervention and the intervention of short message service (SMS) attendance-reminders for collective sessions.
Access, participation and appreciation of information and communication technology (ICT) interventions (N=262).
| Access, participation, and appreciation of interventions | Statistics, n (%) | ||
| Declared interest in Facebook groupa (n=196) | 153 (78.1) | ||
| Providing a mobile number at the start of the academic year | 207 (79.0) | ||
| In at least 1 collective session | 168 (64.1) | ||
| In the Facebook group | 21 (8.0) | ||
| Declared reception of SMSb attendance-reminders for collective sessions (all adolescents; n=116) | 93 (80.2) | ||
| Declared reception of SMS attendance-reminders for collective sessions (of adolescents concernedc; n=91) | 82 (90.1) | ||
| Positive appreciation of the Facebook group (n=13) | 10 (76.9) | ||
| Positive appreciation of SMS attendance-reminders for collective sessions (all adolescents; n=115) | 93 (80.9) | ||
| Positive appreciation of SMS attendance-reminders for collective sessions (of adolescents concernedc; n=91) | 77 (84.6) | ||
aAmong adolescents seen by the coach in the 2013-2014 start-of-year interviews (n=262 minus number missing for the item).
bSMS: short message service.
cAmong adolescents both answering the questionnaire and having given a mobile phone number (n=207 minus number missing for the item).
Multivariate regression models for access to a mobile phone and participation in collective sessions.
| Characteristics | Short message service attendance-reminders | ||||||||
| Mobile phone access | Collective session attendance | ||||||||
| N | n (%) | Multivariate regressiona | N | n (%) | Multivariate regressiona | ||||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||||
| Agec (OR for 1 year age increase) | 262 | 207 (79.0) | 262 | 168 (64.1) | 0.7 (0.5-1) | .04 | |||
| Boys | 114 | 82 (71.9) | 1 Reference value | 114 | 68 (59.6) | ||||
| Girls | 148 | 125 (84.5) | 2.1 (1.1-3.9) | 148 | 100 (67.6) | ||||
| Professional high school | 117 | 100 (85.5) | 1 Reference value | 117 | 76 (65.0) | ||||
| General high school | 91 | 75 (82.4) | 0.8 (0.4-1.6) | 91 | 53 (58.2) | ||||
| Middle school | 54 | 32 (59.3) | 0.2 (0.1-0.5) | 54 | 39 (72.2) | ||||
| Written consent | 47 | 35 (74.5) | 47 | 45 (95.7) | 1 | ||||
| Tacit consent | 215 | 172 (80.0) | 215 | 123 (57.2) | 0.1 (0-0.3) | ||||
aOnly factors with a significant association at .2 alpha risk in the bivariate regressions were candidates for entering into the multivariate model (n=89).
bP value is the level of significance of the test of the OR against 1.
cFor age, N, n, and % describe the total sample and as age is a quantitative variable, the OR corresponds to 1 year age increase.