S M Sawyer1, A Zalan, L M Bond. 1. Centre for Adolescent Health, Department of Paediatrics, Royal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. sawyers@cryptic.rch.unimelb.edu.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of telephone reminders on adolescent clinic attendance. METHODS:Clinic bookings of adolescents were randomly assigned to either a telephone reminder one day prior to their appointment, or a routine booking (no reminder). The setting was four general adolescent health clinics within a tertiary public adolescent health care service at the Centre for Adolescent Health. The main outcome measures were clinic non-attendance, reason for non-attendance, and satisfaction with the booking system. RESULTS:One hundred and seventy one adolescent appointments were studied. Of these, 51.5% were female, and 25% of bookings were for new, rather than review appointments. One hundred and one adolescents were randomly allocated to the reminder group, of whom 87% were contacted. The use of reminders (intention to treat analysis) significantly reduced the non-attendance rate from 20% to 8% (odds ratio 0.35; P = 0.03). Non-attendance was three times more likely for a new appointment than for review appointments. 'Forgetting' was the most common explanation given by patients (35%) who did not attend. Seventy-nine per cent of parents reported telephone reminders were helpful at prompting attendance. CONCLUSION:Telephone reminders greatly improved attendance at these adolescent clinics. The background non-attendance rate and the proportion of high-risk patients for non-attendance (new appointments in this setting) will determine whether reminders are more efficiently targeted at specific bookings than used routinely.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To measure the effect of telephone reminders on adolescent clinic attendance. METHODS: Clinic bookings of adolescents were randomly assigned to either a telephone reminder one day prior to their appointment, or a routine booking (no reminder). The setting was four general adolescent health clinics within a tertiary public adolescent health care service at the Centre for Adolescent Health. The main outcome measures were clinic non-attendance, reason for non-attendance, and satisfaction with the booking system. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy one adolescent appointments were studied. Of these, 51.5% were female, and 25% of bookings were for new, rather than review appointments. One hundred and one adolescents were randomly allocated to the reminder group, of whom 87% were contacted. The use of reminders (intention to treat analysis) significantly reduced the non-attendance rate from 20% to 8% (odds ratio 0.35; P = 0.03). Non-attendance was three times more likely for a new appointment than for review appointments. 'Forgetting' was the most common explanation given by patients (35%) who did not attend. Seventy-nine per cent of parents reported telephone reminders were helpful at prompting attendance. CONCLUSION: Telephone reminders greatly improved attendance at these adolescent clinics. The background non-attendance rate and the proportion of high-risk patients for non-attendance (new appointments in this setting) will determine whether reminders are more efficiently targeted at specific bookings than used routinely.
Authors: Stella T Alamo; Glenn J Wagner; Pamela Sunday; Rhoda K Wanyenze; Joseph Ouma; Moses Kamya; Robert Colebunders; Fred Wabwire-Mangen Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-02
Authors: Jennifer R Walton; Jennifer A Mautone; Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis; Nathan J Blum; Thomas J Power Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 1.505
Authors: Michael J A Reid; Shumon I Dhar; Mark Cary; Patric Liang; James Thompson; Lesego Gabaitiri; Katherine Steele; Susan Mayisela; Diana Dickinson; Harvey Friedman; Darren R Linkin; Andrew P Steenhoff Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Alexa B D'Angelo; Javier Lopez-Rios; Anthony W P Flynn; Ian W Holloway; David W Pantalone; Christian Grov Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Su-May Liew; Seng Fah Tong; Verna Kar Mun Lee; Chirk Jenn Ng; Kwok Chi Leong; Cheong Lieng Teng Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Sachin J Shah; Patrick Cronin; Clemens S Hong; Andrew S Hwang; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Benjamin I Bearnot; Calvin A Richardson; Blair W Fosburgh; Alexandra B Kimball Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 5.128