Literature DB >> 29776786

Increases in Sugary Drink Marketing During Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Issuance in New York.

Alyssa J Moran1, Aviva Musicus2, Mary T Gorski Findling3, Ian F Brissette4, Ann A Lowenfels4, S V Subramanian5, Christina A Roberto6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest federal food assistance program, providing $67 billion in benefits to 44 million Americans. Some states distribute SNAP benefits over one or a few days each month, which may create an incentive for retailers to heavily promote top-selling products, like sugar-sweetened beverages, when benefits are disbursed.
METHODS: A beverage environment scan assessing presence of displays, advertisements, and price promotions for sugar-sweetened, low-calorie, and unsweetened beverages was administered in a census of SNAP-authorized beverage retailers (n=630) in three cities in New York from September to November 2011. Multilevel regression models controlling for store type; county; and percentage SNAP enrollment, poverty, and non-Hispanic white population in the store's census tract were used to estimate the odds of in-store beverage marketing during the SNAP benefit issuance period compared to other days of the month. Data were analyzed in 2016.
RESULTS: There were higher odds of in-store sugar-sweetened beverage marketing during SNAP benefit issuance days (first to ninth days of the month) compared with other days of the month, particularly for sugar-sweetened beverage advertisements (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.01, 2.72) and displays (OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.16, 3.03). In census tracts with high SNAP enrollment (>28%), the odds of a retailer having sugar-sweetened beverage displays were 4.35 times higher (95% CI=1.93, 9.98) during issuance compared with non-issuance days. There were no differences in marketing for low-calorie or unsweetened beverages.
CONCLUSIONS: Increases in sugar-sweetened beverage marketing during issuance may exacerbate disparities in diet quality of households participating in SNAP. Policy changes, like extending SNAP benefit issuance, may mitigate these effects.
Copyright © 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29776786      PMCID: PMC6128139          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  31 in total

1.  Disparities in Obesity-Related Outdoor Advertising by Neighborhood Income and Race.

Authors:  Diana L Cassady; Karen Liaw; Lisa M Soederberg Miller
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Comparing sugary drinks in the food retail environment in six NYC neighborhoods.

Authors:  Tamar Adjoian; Rachel Dannefer; Rachel Sacks; Gretchen Van Wye
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-04

3.  Associations of food stamp participation with dietary quality and obesity in children.

Authors:  Cindy W Leung; Susan J Blumenthal; Elena E Hoffnagle; Helen H Jensen; Susan B Foerster; Marion Nestle; Lilian W Y Cheung; Dariush Mozaffarian; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Obesity Prevention in the Supermarket-Choice Architecture and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Authors:  Anne N Thorndike; Cass R Sunstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Transactions at a Northeastern Supermarket Chain: Differences by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Use.

Authors:  Rebecca L Franckle; Alyssa Moran; Tao Hou; Dan Blue; Julie Greene; Anne N Thorndike; Michele Polacsek; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva; Joerg Luedicke; Kathryn E Henderson; Amanda S Tripp
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Child-directed marketing inside and on the exterior of fast food restaurants.

Authors:  Punam Ohri-Vachaspati; Zeynep Isgor; Leah Rimkus; Lisa M Powell; Dianne C Barker; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  SNAP participation in preschool-aged children and prevalence of overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Shannon Simmons; Jeffrey L Alexander; Helen Ewing; Stephanie Whetzel
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.118

9.  Sales impact of displaying alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages in end-of-aisle locations: an observational study.

Authors:  Ryota Nakamura; Rachel Pechey; Marc Suhrcke; Susan A Jebb; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people's predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study.

Authors:  Tessa Bollard; Ninya Maubach; Natalie Walker; Cliona Ni Mhurchu
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  15 in total

1.  Support for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Policy Alternatives Among US Adults, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Franckle; Michele Polacsek; Sara N Bleich; Anne N Thorndike; Mary T G Findling; Alyssa J Moran; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A Framework for Increasing Equity Impact in Obesity Prevention.

Authors:  Shiriki K Kumanyika
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Philadelphia's Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Redemption.

Authors:  Benjamin W Chrisinger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The Racialized Marketing of Unhealthy Foods and Beverages: Perspectives and Potential Remedies.

Authors:  Anne Barnhill; A Susana Ramírez; Marice Ashe; Amanda Berhaupt-Glickstein; Nicholas Freudenberg; Sonya A Grier; Karen E Watson; Shiriki Kumanyika
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 1.604

5.  Supermarket Purchases Over the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Month: A Comparison Between Participants and Nonparticipants.

Authors:  Rebecca L Franckle; Anne N Thorndike; Alyssa J Moran; Tao Hou; Dan Blue; Julie C Greene; Sara N Bleich; Jason P Block; Michele Polacsek; Eric B Rimm
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Sugar-sweetened beverage prices: Variations by beverage, food store, and neighborhood characteristics, 2017.

Authors:  Julien Leider; Lisa M Powell
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-04-29

Review 7.  An Exploration of the Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage in Promoting Obesity and Health Disparities.

Authors:  Desiree M Sigala; Kimber L Stanhope
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Perceptions of the Food Environment and Access among Predominantly Black Low-Income Residents of Rural Louisiana Communities.

Authors:  Denise Holston; Jessica Stroope; Matthew Greene; Bailey Houghtaling
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Developing a National Research Agenda to Support Healthy Food Retail.

Authors:  Amelie A Hecht; Megan M Lott; Kirsten Arm; Mary T Story; Emily Snyder; Margo G Wootan; Alyssa J Moran
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Influence of Food and Beverage Companies on Retailer Marketing Strategies and Consumer Behavior.

Authors:  Amelie A Hecht; Crystal L Perez; Michele Polascek; Anne N Thorndike; Rebecca L Franckle; Alyssa J Moran
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.