Literature DB >> 29774227

Identifying What Matters to Hysterectomy Patients: Postsurgery Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences.

Andrew S Bossick1, Roopina Sangha1,2, Heather Olden1, Gwen L Alexander1, Ganesa Wegienka1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hysterectomy is the most common non-obstetrical surgery for women in the United States. Few investigations comparing hysterectomy surgical approaches include patient-centered outcomes.
METHODS: The study was performed at Henry Ford Health System in Detroit, Michigan between February 2015 and May 2015. The data were collected through structured focus groups with 24 post-hysterectomy women in order to identify PCOs to employ in a subsequent cohort study of hysterectomy surgical approaches. One pilot focus group and five additional focus groups were held. Qualitative data analysis, using data from coded transcripts of focus groups, was used to identify themes.Eligible women, aged between 18 and 65 years and had an EMR documented Current Procedural Terminology (CPT™) code or an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems - Ninth Edition (ICD-9) code of hysterectomy between December 2012 and December 2014 (N=1,381, N=307 after exclusions) were selected and recruited. A question guide was developed to investigate women's experiences and feelings about the experience prior and subsequent to their hysterectomy. Analysis utilized the Framework Method.
RESULTS: Focus groups with women who previously had a hysterectomy revealed their pre- and post-hysterectomy perceptions. Responses grouped into topics of pre- and post-surgical experiences, and information all women should know. Responses grouped into themes of 1) decision making, 2) the procedure - surgical experience, 3) recovery, 4) advice to past self, and 5) recommendations to other women.
CONCLUSION: These findings about perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes of women having undergone hysterectomy could support health care providers deliver patient-centered care. These results informed data collection for a prospective longitudinal cohort study that is now underway. The data suggest a need for increased education and empowerment in the decision making process, while expanding on information given for post-operative expectations and somatic changes that occur post-hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29774227      PMCID: PMC5953196          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  22 in total

1.  Beliefs and perceptions of African American women who have had hysterectomy.

Authors:  Cheryl E Augustus
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.959

2.  Predictors of hysterectomy use and satisfaction.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Lee A Learman; Michael Schembri; Steven E Gregorich; Rebecca Jackson; Alison Jacoby; James Lewis; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Lee A Learman; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Feng Lin; Holly E Richter; Jonathan Showstack; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Oophorectomy in premenopausal women: health-related quality of life and sexual functioning.

Authors:  Vanessa Teplin; Eric Vittinghoff; Feng Lin; Lee A Learman; Holly E Richter; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Prospective evaluation of quality of life in total versus supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki; Thomas T Vellinga; Gudrun M Jonsdottir; Magnus K Magnusson; Rie Maurer; Honami Yoshida; Brian Walsh
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Sexual outcomes and satisfaction with hysterectomy: influence of patient education.

Authors:  Andrea Bradford; Cindy Meston
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Overweight adolescents and asthma: Revealing motivations and challenges with adolescent-provider communication.

Authors:  Gwen L Alexander; Heather A Olden; Tanya Troy; Cheryl A Miree; Christine L M Joseph
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.515

8.  Focus groups inform a web-based program to increase fruit and vegetable intake.

Authors:  Sharon J Rolnick; Josephine Calvi; Jerianne Heimendinger; Jennifer B McClure; Mary Kelley; Christine Johnson; Gwen L Alexander
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-05-05

9.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  6 in total

1.  Uncertainty and Competing Priorities in Shared Clinical Decision-Making.

Authors:  Dennis J Baumgardner
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2018-04-26

2.  Patient Perceptions of Planned Organ Removal During Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Zeinab Kassem; Chad M Coleman; Andrew S Bossick; Wan-Ting Su; Roopina Sangha; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.

Authors:  Heather A Olden; Sara Santarossa; Dana Murphy; Christine C Johnson; Karen E Kippen
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2022-01-17

4.  Women's interdependence after hysterectomy: a qualitative study based on Roy adaptation model.

Authors:  Fatemeh Goudarzi; Talat Khadivzadeh; Abbas Ebadi; Raheleh Babazadeh
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  A qualitative study of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women seeking pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Erin Knox; Kaylee Ramage; Natalie Scime; Ariel Ducey; Erin Brennand
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2022-09-08

6.  Bridging different realities - a qualitative study on patients' experiences of preoperative care for benign hysterectomy and opportunistic salpingectomy in Sweden.

Authors:  Elin Collins; Maria Lindqvist; Ingrid Mogren; Annika Idahl
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.