Literature DB >> 21784713

Prospective evaluation of quality of life in total versus supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Jon I Einarsson1, Yoko Suzuki, Thomas T Vellinga, Gudrun M Jonsdottir, Magnus K Magnusson, Rie Maurer, Honami Yoshida, Brian Walsh.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare recovery times and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH).
DESIGN: Patients underwent either a TLH or LSH. After surgery, patients maintained a daily log documenting pain, nausea, use of pain medications, and return to daily activities. They also completed a QOL questionnaire (SF-36) before and after surgery. DESIGN CLASSIFICATION: Prospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-1).
SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 122 women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 122 women underwent TLH (n = 71) or LSH (n = 51) for benign indications from February 2008 to January 2010. There was a significantly higher postoperative improvement of QOL scores in the LSH group in 6 of 10 questionnaire categories and summary scores, including physical functioning (p =.03), role physical (p =.002), and bodily pain (p =.03). There were no significant differences in use of pain medications, level of pain, level of nausea, or return to normal activities.
CONCLUSION: LSH appears to provide greater improvement in short-term postoperative QOL compared with TLH. No significant differences were found in postoperative pain or return to daily activities.
Copyright © 2011 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21784713     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  3 in total

1.  Cervical Detachment Using Monopolar SupraLoop™ Electrode versus Monopolar Needle in Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LSH): An Interventional, Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  S Brucker; R Rothmund; B Krämer; F Neis; B Schönfisch; W Zubke; F A Taran; M Wallwiener
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  The Feasibility of Societal Cost Equivalence between Robotic Hysterectomy and Alternate Hysterectomy Methods for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Neel T Shah; Kelly N Wright; Gudrun M Jonsdottir; Selena Jorgensen; Jon I Einarsson; Michael G Muto
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-15

3.  Identifying What Matters to Hysterectomy Patients: Postsurgery Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences.

Authors:  Andrew S Bossick; Roopina Sangha; Heather Olden; Gwen L Alexander; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2018-04-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.