Literature DB >> 31414021

Patient Perceptions of Planned Organ Removal During Hysterectomy.

Zeinab Kassem1, Chad M Coleman1, Andrew S Bossick1, Wan-Ting Su1, Roopina Sangha2, Ganesa Wegienka1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous reports indicate many women may not have a firm grasp on likely outcomes of different hysterectomy procedures. This study aimed to assess women's self-reported expectations of how they think their anatomy will change after hysterectomy.
METHODS: Women scheduled for hysterectomy at a tertiary care hospital, for non-oncological reasons, reported their planned procedure type and the organs they understood would be removed 2 weeks prior to surgery. Patient reports and electronic medical records were reviewed, and kappa statistics (κ) were calculated to assess agreement for all women and within subgroups.
RESULTS: Most of the 456 study participants (mean age: 48.02 ± 8.29 years) were either white/Caucasian (n=238, 52.2%) or African American (n=196, 43.0%). Among the 145 participants who reported a partial hysterectomy, 130 (89.7%) women indicated that their uterus would be removed and 52 (35.9%) reported that their cervix would be removed. Of those whose response was total hysterectomy (n=228), 208 (91.2%) participants reported their uterus would be removed and 143 (62.7%) reported their cervix would be removed. Among 144 women reporting a planned partial hysterectomy, only 15 (10.4%, κ=0.05) had a partial hysterectomy recorded in the electronic medical record. Among the 228 women who reported a planned total hysterectomy, 6.1% (κ=0.05) had a different procedure. While 125 participants reported planned ovary removal, only 93 (74.4%, κ=0.55) had an oophorectomy. Similarly, 290 participants reported planned fallopian tube removal, with 276 (95.2%, κ=0.06) having a salpingectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of women undergoing hysterectomy do not accurately report the organs that are planned be removed during their hysterectomy. This work demonstrates the need to improve patient understanding of their clinical care and its implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gynecology; hysterectomy; patient education; patient expectations; patient-centered outcomes

Year:  2019        PMID: 31414021      PMCID: PMC6676751          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  24 in total

1.  JAMA patient page. Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Janet M Torpy; Cassio Lynm; Richard M Glass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Predictors of hysterectomy use and satisfaction.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Lee A Learman; Michael Schembri; Steven E Gregorich; Rebecca Jackson; Alison Jacoby; James Lewis; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2008-01

Review 5.  Postoperative patient education: a systematic review.

Authors:  Suzanne Fredericks; Sepali Guruge; Souraya Sidani; Teresa Wan
Journal:  Clin Nurs Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.075

6.  Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Miriam Kuppermann; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Lee A Learman; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Feng Lin; Holly E Richter; Jonathan Showstack; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A qualitative study of women's hysterectomy experience.

Authors:  R D Williams; A J Clark
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2000

8.  Hysterectomy: what do women need and want to know?

Authors:  J Wade; P K Pletsch; S W Morgan; S A Menting
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

9.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Total or Supracervical Hysterectomy (TOSH) Trial.

Authors:  W Jerod Greer; Holly E Richter; Thomas L Wheeler; R Edward Varner; Jeff M Szychowski; Miriam Kuppermann; Lee A Learman
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.091

10.  Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Mary L McHugh
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  1 in total

1.  A Prospective Study of Patterns of Regret in the Year After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Roopina Sangha; Andrew Bossick; Wan-Ting K Su; Chad Coleman; Neha Chavali; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2020-10-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.