Literature DB >> 35111881

Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.

Heather A Olden1, Sara Santarossa1, Dana Murphy1, Christine C Johnson1, Karen E Kippen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper was intended to share a flexible engagement model (FEM) for organizing a structure to obtain patient input regarding health care operations and research, provide greater detail on recruitment, retention, and dissemination strategies, and demonstrate successes and potential applications in other health care settings.
METHODS: Utilizing a pragmatic approach, the Patient-Engaged Research Center (PERC) at Henry Ford Health System developed the FEM, a 7-step process to introduce interested patients/caregivers to the patient advisor program and to follow up with placements. PERC developed a meeting evaluation to measure participant satisfaction. Retention and dissemination methods to keep participants consistently engaged included monthly email blasts, an annual patient advisor retreat, and inviting patient advisors to attend/present at local and national conferences.
RESULTS: As of January 2020, the program had 419 patient advisors. Almost 50% self-reported as Caucasian and 31% as African American; 73% were women, and most were 45-74 years of age. Recruitment methods proved effective, as 85% of advisors were initially engaged through print and digital marketing. Mean advisor orientation workshop evaluation scores regarding content, facilitators, and logistics were high, with all 4.5 or higher on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly negative) to 5 (strongly positive).
CONCLUSIONS: Given the FEM's flexible nature and adaptability, PERC has been successful in effectively leveraging the patient voice and experiences in research and health care delivery. Further research could investigate the model's generalizability, return on investment, and how to formally embed its methodology institutionally.
© 2022 Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dissemination; flexible engagement model; health services research; patient advisor; patient engagement; retention

Year:  2022        PMID: 35111881      PMCID: PMC8772608          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  25 in total

1.  Patient engagement and study design of PROP UP: A multi-site patient-centered prospective observational study of patients undergoing hepatitis C treatment.

Authors:  Donna M Evon; Carol E Golin; Paul Stewart; Michael W Fried; Shani Alston; Bryce Reeve; Anna S Lok; Richard K Sterling; Joseph K Lim; Nancy Reau; Souvik Sarkar; David R Nelson; K R Reddy; Adrian M Di Bisceglie
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Patient engagement in the design and execution of urologic oncology research.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Svetlana Avulova; Ralph Conwill; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Training patient and family storytellers and patient and family faculty.

Authors:  Lisa Morrise; Katy Jo Stevens
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

4.  Mapping the Landscape of Patient-centric Activities Within Clinical Research.

Authors:  Mary Jo Lamberti; Josephine Awatin
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.

Authors:  Kristin L Carman; Pam Dardess; Maureen Maurer; Shoshanna Sofaer; Karen Adams; Christine Bechtel; Jennifer Sweeney
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Patient engagement: four case studies that highlight the potential for improved health outcomes and reduced costs.

Authors:  Jeremy Laurance; Sarah Henderson; Peter J Howitt; Mariam Matar; Hanan Al Kuwari; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Improving Patient-centered Care: How Clinical Staff Overcome Barriers to Patient Engagement at the VHA.

Authors:  Aneeza Z Agha; Rachel M Werner; Shimrit Keddem; Tiffany L Huseman; Judith A Long; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Engaging patients in primary care practice transformation: theory, evidence and practice.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 9.  The impact of patient advisors on healthcare outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anjana E Sharma; Margae Knox; Victor L Mleczko; J Nwando Olayiwola
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Identifying What Matters to Hysterectomy Patients: Postsurgery Perceptions, Beliefs, and Experiences.

Authors:  Andrew S Bossick; Roopina Sangha; Heather Olden; Gwen L Alexander; Ganesa Wegienka
Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev       Date:  2018-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.