Wanling Ma1, Guangwen Zhang1, Jing Ren1, Qi Pan1, Didi Wen1, Jinman Zhong1, Zhuoli Zhang2, Yi Huan1. 1. Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China. 2. Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) parameters such as standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCstandard), pure diffusion coefficient (Dslow), pseudodiffusion coefficient (Dfast) and perfusion fraction (ƒ) for differentiating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with different pathological grades. METHODS: Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study protocol. Subjects comprised 38 PDACs confirmed by pathology. Pancreatic multiple b values DWI with 15 b values of 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, 1,000, 1200, 1,500, and 2,000 s/mm2 was performed using GE Discovery MR750 3.0T scanner. ADCstandard, Dslow, Dfast and ƒ values of all PDACs were calculated using mono- and bi-exponential models. Parameters of well/moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated PDAC were compared using Independent Sample t-test. P values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Mean Dslow value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly lower than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (0.540×10-3vs. 0.676×10-3 mm2/s, P<0.001). Mean ƒ value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (60.3% vs. 38.4%, P<0.001). The area under curve value of ƒ in differentiating well/moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC was slightly higher than that of Dslow (0.894>0.865). When the Dslow value was less than or equal to 0.599×10-3 mm2/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 84.6% respectively. When ƒ value was greater than 49.6%, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.0% and 84.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dslow and ƒ derived from IVIM-DWI model can be used to distinguish well/moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC. And to serve this purpose, Dslow and ƒ have high diagnostic performance. IVIM-DWI is a promising and non-invasive tool for predicting pathological grade of PDAC.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) parameters such as standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCstandard), pure diffusion coefficient (Dslow), pseudodiffusion coefficient (Dfast) and perfusion fraction (ƒ) for differentiating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with different pathological grades. METHODS: Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study protocol. Subjects comprised 38 PDACs confirmed by pathology. Pancreatic multiple b values DWI with 15 b values of 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, 1,000, 1200, 1,500, and 2,000 s/mm2 was performed using GE Discovery MR750 3.0T scanner. ADCstandard, Dslow, Dfast and ƒ values of all PDACs were calculated using mono- and bi-exponential models. Parameters of well/moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated PDAC were compared using Independent Sample t-test. P values <0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Mean Dslow value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly lower than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (0.540×10-3vs. 0.676×10-3 mm2/s, P<0.001). Mean ƒ value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (60.3% vs. 38.4%, P<0.001). The area under curve value of ƒ in differentiating well/moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC was slightly higher than that of Dslow (0.894>0.865). When the Dslow value was less than or equal to 0.599×10-3 mm2/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 84.6% respectively. When ƒ value was greater than 49.6%, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.0% and 84.6% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Dslow and ƒ derived from IVIM-DWI model can be used to distinguish well/moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC. And to serve this purpose, Dslow and ƒ have high diagnostic performance. IVIM-DWI is a promising and non-invasive tool for predicting pathological grade of PDAC.
Authors: Yi Wang; Zongming E Chen; Paul Nikolaidis; Robert J McCarthy; Laura Merrick; Laura A Sternick; Jeanne M Horowitz; Vahid Yaghmai; Frank H Miller Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jonathan R Treadwell; Hanna M Zafar; Matthew D Mitchell; Kelley Tipton; Ursina Teitelbaum; Jane Jue Journal: Pancreas Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Juan Peng; Wei-Cheng Wang; Jing Zheng; Cui Yang; Ran Wang; Yi Zhou; Yun-Yun Tao; Xue-Qin Gong; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Lin Yang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 4.379