Literature DB >> 29770884

Activated carbon fiber filters could reduce the risk of surgical smoke exposure during laparoscopic surgery: application of volatile organic compounds.

Seock Hwan Choi1,2, Dong Hee Choi3, Dong Hwa Kang4, Yun-Sok Ha2, Jun Nyung Lee1,5, Bum Soo Kim1,2, Hyun Tae Kim1,5, Eun Sang Yoo1,2, Tae Gyun Kwon1,5, Sung Kwang Chung1,2, Tae-Hwan Kim6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generation of smoke is inevitable during surgical procedures. Some volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in surgical smoke are known to be strong carcinogens. We used a prototype of a multi-layered complex filter in an attempt to eliminate VOCs.
METHODS: From June 2015 to July 2015, 20 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Smoke (pre-filter) was collected 20 min after the electrocautery device was first used during the surgery, by the direct collection method, with a 5-L Tedlar® gas-sampling bag. Twenty and 120 min after the filter was applied, smoke (post-filter) was again collected using the same method. The sample was analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrography. The cancer risk and hazard quotient were analyzed based on US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines.
RESULTS: Twenty patients with a median age of 54.5 (30-80) years were enrolled in the study. Eighteen VOCs were detected using the Japanese indoor air standards mix analysis. The total elimination rate of the VOCs was 86.49 ± 2.83%. The post-filter (120 min) cancer risk (mean ± standard deviation) reduced to a negligible level for benzene, ethylbenzene, and styrene except 1,2-dichloroethane. The post-filter (120 min) hazard quotient for each compound decreased to levels posing a negligible risk for acetone, hexane, benzene, toluene, p-xylene, o-xylene, and styrene.
CONCLUSION: Strong carcinogens, such as 1,2-dichloroethane, benzene, and ethylbenzene, were eliminated by more than 85% by using this activated carbon fiber filter and the risks from these compounds decreased to an almost negligible level. We suggest using every measure, including these filters, to protect the health of operating room personnel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer risk; Laparoscopy; Surgical smoke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29770884     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6222-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  The hazards of surgical smoke. Not to be sniffed at!

Authors:  Jill Biggins; Steve Renfree
Journal:  Br J Perioper Nurs       Date:  2002-04

2.  Effect of Perioperative Bacteriological Safety on Hip Joint Infection after Hip Replacement.

Authors:  Iwona Morawik; Mirosław Jabłoński
Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  A review of human carcinogens--Part F: chemical agents and related occupations.

Authors:  Robert Baan; Yann Grosse; Kurt Straif; Béatrice Secretan; Fatiha El Ghissassi; Véronique Bouvard; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Neela Guha; Crystal Freeman; Laurent Galichet; Vincent Cogliano
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Chemical composition of surgical smoke formed in the abdominal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy--assessment of the risk to the patient.

Authors:  Miłosz Dobrogowski; Wiktor Wesołowski; Małgorzata Kucharska; Andrzej Sapota; Lech Sylwester Pomorski
Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 5.  Precision surgery and genitourinary cancers.

Authors:  R Autorino; F Porpiglia; P Dasgupta; J Rassweiler; J W Catto; L J Hampton; E Lima; V Mirone; I H Derweesh; F M J Debruyne
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Edward F Fitzgerald; Momin Malik; Irfan Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air?

Authors:  W L Barrett; S M Garber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Seock Hwan Choi; Tae Gyun Kwon; Sung Kwang Chung; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Performance of Facepiece Respirators and Surgical Masks Against Surgical Smoke: Simulated Workplace Protection Factor Study.

Authors:  Shuang Gao; Richard H Koehler; Michael Yermakov; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2016-02-28

10.  Does a mobile laminar airflow screen reduce bacterial contamination in the operating room? A numerical study using computational fluid dynamics technique.

Authors:  Sasan Sadrizadeh; Ann Tammelin; Peter V Nielsen; Sture Holmberg
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-06-26
View more
  7 in total

1.  Minimizing the Risk of Aerosol Contamination During Elective Lung Resection Surgery.

Authors:  George Rakovich; Robert Urbanowicz; Rami Issa; Han Ting Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Impact of Surgical Smoke on the Surgical Team and Operating Room Nurses and Its Reduction Strategies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amirmohammad Merajikhah; Behzad Imani; Salman Khazaei; Hamid Bouraghi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Surgical smoke: modern mobile smoke evacuation systems improve occupational safety in the operating theatre.

Authors:  Konstantinos Gioutsos; Thanh-Long Nguyen; Ulrich Biber; Markus D Enderle; Abigail Koss; Gregor J Kocher
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Surgical Smoke-Hazard Perceptions and Protective Measures in German Operating Rooms.

Authors:  Martina Michaelis; Felix Martin Hofmann; Albert Nienhaus; Udo Eickmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Chemicals in Surgical Smoke and the Efficiency of Built-in-Filter Ports.

Authors:  Hyeong In Ha; Min Chul Choi; Sang Geun Jung; Won Duk Joo; Chan Lee; Seung Hun Song; Hyun Park
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Investigating surgical smoke in otolaryngology operating rooms.

Authors:  Chun-I Li; Ying-Hsiang Chou; Jar-Yuan Pai; Chih-Hsuan Chen; Min-Chi Chiang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.