Literature DB >> 24570016

Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery.

Seock Hwan Choi1, Tae Gyun Kwon, Sung Kwang Chung, Tae-Hwan Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical smoke production is inevitable during surgical procedures. Although many workplaces have adopted smoke-free environments, healthcare workers, especially surgeons, continue to be exposed to surgical smoke.
METHODS: From February 2013 to March 2013, a total of 20 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. A 5-L gas sample was collected 30 min after the electrocautery device was first used and was analyzed by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Cancer risk was calculated for carcinogenic compounds and hazard quotient was calculated for noncarcinogenic compounds using US Environmental Protection Agency guidelines.
RESULTS: Twenty patients with a median age of 57.5 years were enrolled in the study. Eighteen volatile organic compounds were detected by Japanese indoor air standards mix analysis. The cancer risks were ethanol, 5.10 × 10(-5) ± 6.35 × 10(-5); 1,2-dichloroethane, 4.75 × 10(-3) ± 7.42 × 10(-4); benzene, 1.09 × 10(-3) ± 4.33 × 10(-4); ethylbenzene, 2.87 × 10(-5) ± 1.32 × 10(-5); and styrene, 2.94 × 10(-6) ± 1.16 × 10(-6). The hazard quotients were acetone, 1.88 × 10(-2) ± 7.63 × 10(-3); hexane, 1.48 × 10(-1) ± 8.70 × 10(-2); benzene, 4.66 ± 1.85; toluene, 2.61 × 10(-2) ± 7.23 × 10(-3); p-xylene, 1.81 × 10(-1) ± 6.45 × 10(-2); o-xylene, 2.40 × 10(-2) ± 3.33 × 10(-2); and styrene, 5.15 × 10(-3) ± 2.03 × 10(-3).
CONCLUSIONS: For five carcinogenic compounds detected, the cancer risk was greater than negligible. For 1,2-dichloroethane and benzene, the risk was classified as unacceptable. Analysis of noncarcinogenic compounds showed that risk reduction measures are needed for benzene. Even though surgical smoke is not an immediate health hazard, operating room personnel should be aware of the potential long-term health risks associated with exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24570016     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3472-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  2 in total

1.  A review of human carcinogens--Part F: chemical agents and related occupations.

Authors:  Robert Baan; Yann Grosse; Kurt Straif; Béatrice Secretan; Fatiha El Ghissassi; Véronique Bouvard; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Neela Guha; Crystal Freeman; Laurent Galichet; Vincent Cogliano
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Surgical smoke.

Authors:  Joe King-Man Fan; Fion Siu-Yin Chan; Kent-Man Chu
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.767

  2 in total
  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of fine particles in surgical smoke from an urologist's operating room by time and by distance.

Authors:  Hong-Kai Wang; Fei Mo; Chun-Guang Ma; Bo Dai; Guo-Hai Shi; Yao Zhu; Hai-Liang Zhang; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Activated carbon fiber filters could reduce the risk of surgical smoke exposure during laparoscopic surgery: application of volatile organic compounds.

Authors:  Seock Hwan Choi; Dong Hee Choi; Dong Hwa Kang; Yun-Sok Ha; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Hyun Tae Kim; Eun Sang Yoo; Tae Gyun Kwon; Sung Kwang Chung; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ultrasonic versus monopolar energy-based surgical devices in terms of surgical smoke and lateral thermal damage (ULMOST): a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Chahien Choi; In-Gu Do; Taejong Song
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Deeply reconsidering elective surgery: worldwide concerns regarding colorectal surgery in a COVID-19 pandemic and a Singapore perspective.

Authors:  Min Hoe Chew; Winson Jianhong Tan; Chee Yung Ng; Kheng Hong Ng
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Global Survey on Pancreatic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Atsushi Oba; Thomas F Stoop; Matthias Löhr; Thilo Hackert; Nicholas Zyromski; William H Nealon; Michiaki Unno; Richard D Schulick; Mohammed H Al-Musawi; Wenming Wu; Yupei Zhao; Sohei Satoi; Christopher L Wolfgang; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Marc G Besselink; Marco Del Chiaro
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Minimizing the Risk of Aerosol Contamination During Elective Lung Resection Surgery.

Authors:  George Rakovich; Robert Urbanowicz; Rami Issa; Han Ting Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Clinical significance of lipid droplets formed in the peritoneal fluid after laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Shin-Hoo Park; Seong-Woo Bae; Kyoung-Yun Jeong; Eun-Hee Koo; Jong-Ho Choi; Ji-Hyeon Park; Seong-Ho Kong; Won-Sil Choi; Do Joong Park; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Occupational hazards of orthopaedic surgery and adult reconstruction: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sravya P Vajapey; Mengnai Li; Andrew H Glassman
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02

10.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons produced by electrocautery smoke and the use of personal protective equipment 1.

Authors:  Caroline Vieira Claudio; Renata Perfeito Ribeiro; Júlia Trevisan Martins; Maria Helena Palucci Marziale; Maria Cristina Solci; José Carlos Dalmas
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.