Literature DB >> 29770586

Surgical Infection after Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Arthrodesis: CT Analysis of Spinal Fusion.

Pablo Andrés-Cano1,2, Ana Cerván1, Miguel Rodríguez-Solera1, Jose Antonio Ortega1, Natividad Rebollo3, Enrique Guerado1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of infection after instrumented lumbar spine surgery, the demographic and surgical variables associated with acute infection, and the influence of infection and debridement on the consolidation of spinal fusion.
METHODS: After obtaining approval from the hospital ethics committee, an observational study was made on a prospective cohort of consecutive patients surgically treated by posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis (n = 139, 2005-2011). In all cases, the minimum follow-up period was 18 months. The following bivariate analysis was conducted of demographic and surgical variables: non-infection group (n = 123); infection group (n = 16). Fusion rates were determined by multislice CT. Logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Incidence of deep infection requiring debridement: 11.51% (95% confidence interval, 5.85-17.18]). Bivariate analysis: differences were observed in hospital stay (7.0 days [range, 4-10] vs 14.50 days [range, 5.25-33.75]; P = 0.013), surgical time (3.15 h vs 4.09 h; P = 0.004), body mass index (25.11 kg/m2 [22.58-27.0] vs 26.02 kg/m2 [24.15 to 29.38]; P = 0.043), Charlson comorbidity index (median, 0 vs 1; P = 0.027), and rate of unsuccessful consolidation according to CT (18.4% vs 72.7%; P = 0.0001). In a model of multivariate logistic regression, taking as the dependent variable unsuccessful arthrodesis after 1 year, and adjusting for the other independent variables (infection, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, and surgical time), the only variable that was significantly associated with an outcome of unsuccessful spinal fusion after 1 year was infection, with OR = 12.44 (95% confidence interval, 2.50-61.76).
CONCLUSION: Deep infection after instrumented lumbar spine arthrodesis is a common complication that compromises the radiographic outcome of surgery. Patients who develop a postoperative infection and require debridement surgery are 12 times less likely to achieve satisfactory radiological fusion.
© 2018 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infection; Lumbar spine arthrodesis; Spinal fusion; Spinal pseudarthrosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29770586      PMCID: PMC6594514          DOI: 10.1111/os.12371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  46 in total

1.  Spine infections: variations in incidence during the academic year.

Authors:  Stephen P Banco; Alexander R Vaccaro; Oren Blam; Jason C Eck; Jerome M Cotler; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert; Sheila Murphey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman; Philip Sailer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman; Mladen Djurasovic
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Efficacy of dilute betadine solution irrigation in the prevention of postoperative infection of spinal surgery.

Authors:  Ming-Te Cheng; Ming-Chau Chang; Shih-Tien Wang; Wing-Kwang Yu; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Fang; Serena S Hu; Nathan Endres; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman; Jennifer Howard
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Results of in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; D Bullis; R R Betz; C Baldus; P L Schoenecker
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12

10.  Does shaving the incision site increase the infection rate after spinal surgery?

Authors:  Suat E Celik; Ayhan Kara
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Peak timing for complications after spine surgery].

Authors:  W Pepke; C Wantia; H Almansour; T Bruckner; M Thielen; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Medicosurgical management of deep wound infections after thoracolumbar instrumentation: risk factors of poor outcomes.

Authors:  Paul Frechon; Jocelyn Michon; Aurelie Baldolli; Evelyne Emery; François Lucas; Renaud Verdon; Anna Fournier; Thomas Gaberel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  [Study of modified subcutaneous lumbar spine index as a predictor for short-term effectiveness in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Yuzhu Xu; Pan Fan; Xuanfei Xu; Feng Jiang; Wei Zhang; Xiangjie Yin; Hang Liu; Peiyang Wang; Yuntao Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.