Literature DB >> 16462443

Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment.

Steven J Atlas1, Anthony Delitto.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Lumbar spinal stenosis is being diagnosed increasingly in older people as advanced imaging studies become more widely available and clinicians become more familiar with the presentation of this common condition. For symptomatic patients, the goal of treatment is pain relief and improved function, but there is little empiric evidence to support many of the common interventions used. The relative risks and benefits of various surgical and nonsurgical treatments are poorly understood, and the result has been wide variations in the evaluation and treatment of spinal stenosis across geographic regions. Current practice recommendations are based on expert opinion that incorporates available evidence into existing clinical and biologic paradigms. For most individuals, initial treatment should focus on patient education, medications to control pain, and exercise and physical treatments to regain or maintain activities of daily living. Surgical treatment most commonly is considered in patients not improving with nonsurgical care. Decompressive laminectomy is the standard surgical procedure for patients with spinal stenosis. The addition of fusion with or without instrumentation is considered when spinal stenosis is accompanied by degenerative spondylolisthesis or related to concerns about instability. We review the available evidence for nonsurgical and surgical interventions, and highlight comparative results wherever applicable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16462443     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198722.70138.96

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  39 in total

1.  The effect of the X-Stop implantation on intervertebral foramen, segmental spinal canal length and disc space in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Frederick L Mansfield; Guohua Lü; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Effect of fusion following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Wei-Min Jiang; Xue-Feng Li; Heng Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac of patients with lumbar canal stenosis evaluated by multidetector-row computed tomography after myelography.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kanbara; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Keigo Ito; Masaaki Machino; Fumihiko Kato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Sara R Piva; Charity G Moore; Julie M Fritz; Stephen R Wisniewski; Deborah A Josbeno; Mark Fye; William C Welch
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls.

Authors:  Christy C Tomkins-Lane; Sara Christensen Holz; Karen S Yamakawa; Vaishali V Phalke; Doug J Quint; Jennifer Miner; Andrew J Haig
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: treatment options for an aging population.

Authors:  Roger P Jackson; Anne C McManus; Jill Moore
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec

8.  Patient outcomes after laminotomy, hemilaminectomy, laminectomy and laminectomy with instrumented fusion for spinal canal stenosis: a propensity score-based study from the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Everard Munting; Christoph Röder; Rolf Sobottke; Daniel Dietrich; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Mechanical low back pain--a rheumatologist's view.

Authors:  David Borenstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists.

Authors:  Christine M Comer; Anthony C Redmond; Howard A Bird; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.