Literature DB >> 17426635

Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard.

Leah Y Carreon1, Mladen Djurasovic, Steven D Glassman, Philip Sailer.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Accuracy of a diagnostic test referenced to the gold standard.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the reliability and accuracy of fine-cut computed tomography scans with coronal and sagittal reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion by using surgical exploration as the reference standard. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is still a need for a reliable and accurate noninvasive method to determine the status of a spinal fusion.
METHODS: Three spine surgeons reviewed 93 prerevision fine-cut CT scans over 163 fused levels of consecutive patients who had revision surgery after an instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. The facet joints and posterolateral gutters at each level were classified as fused or not. The surgeons were unaware of the findings on surgical exploration. Interobserver variability and likelihood ratios for a solid fusion when both, one, or none of the facets and when both, one, or none of the posterolateral gutters were fused, were calculated.
RESULTS: There were 42 males and 51 females with a mean age of 57 years (range, 19-86 years) at revision. On exploration, there were 32 (19.6%) nonunions over 163 levels. The kappa for interobserver variability for evaluating facet fusions (0.42) was moderate and for posterolateral fusions (0.62) was substantial. The probability of a solid fusion on exploration was higher when both posterolateral gutters were fused on CT scan (89%) than when both facets were fused on CT scan (74%). When both facets and both posterolateral gutters were fused on CT scan, the probability of a solid fusion on exploration is 96%. The absence of fusion of one or both facets or one posterolateral gutter were poor predictors of nonunion on surgical exploration.
CONCLUSIONS: The CT scan reading of either one or both posterolateral gutters fused or both facets fused were moderately predictive of a solid fusion on surgical exploration. Fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions are moderately predictive of the presence of nonunion when both facets are not fused.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426635     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259808.47104.dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement in fusion status assessment after instrumental desis of the lower lumbar spine using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: impact of observer experience.

Authors:  Borislav Laoutliev; Inger Havsteen; Birthe Højlund Bech; Eva Narvestad; Hanne Christensen; Anders Christensen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Lumbar fusion outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Charles H Crawford; Leah Y Carreon; Mladen Djurasovic; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Union versus nonunion after posterolateral lumbar fusion: a comparison of long-term surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Takahiro Tsutsumimoto; Mitsuhiko Shimogata; Yasuo Yoshimura; Hiromichi Misawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The efficacy of rhBMP-2 versus autograft for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  Kwang-Bok Lee; Cyrus E Taghavi; Margaret S Hsu; Kyung-Jin Song; Jeong Hyun Yoo; Gun Keorochana; Stephanie S Ngo; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Clinical outcomes of treatment with cage-shaped demineralized bone plus local bone grafts vs. autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in instrumented single-level lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chen-Guang Zhao; Jie Qin; Xin Wang; Gang Xu; Yong Jia; Yu-Cheng Guan; Xiang Mou; Hua Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  The role of bone SPECT/CT in patients with persistent or recurrent lumbar pain following lumbar spine stabilization surgery.

Authors:  Khulood Al-Riyami; Stefan Vöö; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Ian Pressney; Adam Meir; Adrian Casey; Sean Molloy; James Allibone; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion in older patients.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Bente L Langdahl; Carsten Ernst; Søren Fruensgaard; Jørgen Ostergaard; Jens Langer Andersen; Sten Rasmussen; Bent Niedermann; Kristian Høy; Peter Helmig; Randi Holm; Bent Erling Lindblad; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Niels Egund; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Fusion rates of instrumented lumbar spinal arthrodesis according to surgical approach: a systematic review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Dong-Ho Lee; Yung-Tae Kim; Hee Sang Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-02-15

9.  Quantitative in vivo fusion assessment by (18)F-fluoride PET/CT following en bloc spondylectomy.

Authors:  Matthias Pumberger; Vikas Prasad; Claudia Druschel; Alexander C Disch; Winfried Brenner; Klaus-Dieter Schaser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michaela Gstöttner; Conrad Kobel; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.