Literature DB >> 31346644

[Peak timing for complications after spine surgery].

W Pepke1, C Wantia1, H Almansour1, T Bruckner2, M Thielen1, M Akbar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spine surgeries can pose many complications; however, peak timing of post-operative complications in the field of spine surgery is still not sufficiently delineated in the literature as yet. Nevertheless the determination of peak timing of post-operative complications has a significant influence on patient education and post-operative follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center study analyzed the medical records of 1179 patients that underwent spinal instrumentation between 2010 and 2015 at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months postoperatively. Complications were analyzed according to their time of onset.
RESULTS: Of the 1179 patients included, 199 (16.9%) underwent revision surgery due to a complication. Peak timing for complications (72.9%) occurred within the first 3 months after surgery. Infection was the most common reason for revision surgery (42.7%) and most infections occurred within the first 3 months after surgery (early infections) (91.8% of infections). Peak timing for material failure occurred in the second post-operative year (46% of all detected prosthesis failures) (2.5% of all complications). DISCUSSION: Peak timing of post-operative complications post spinal instrumentation occurs as early on as within the first 3 months after surgery and post-operative infections remain the most common post-operative complication overall. Nonetheless, regular and long-term postoperative clinical and radiological follow-up is crucial, since in particular prosthesis failure has its peak timing in the second post-operative year.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aftercare; Prosthesis failure; Spine surgery; Spondylodesis; Wound infection

Year:  2020        PMID: 31346644     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-019-03770-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  53 in total

1.  Effect of Antifibrinolytic Therapy on Complications, Thromboembolic Events, Blood Product Utilization, and Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Alex Soroceanu; Jonathan H Oren; Justin S Smith; Richard Hostin; Christopher I Shaffrey; Gregory M Mundis; Christopher P Ames; Douglas C Burton; Shay Bess; Munish C Gupta; Vedat Deviren; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Rod fracture after long construct fusion for spinal deformity: clinical and radiographic risk factors.

Authors:  Tsutomu Akazawa; Toshiaki Kotani; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Tetsuharu Nemoto; Shohei Minami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Justin K Scheer; Jessica A Tang; Vedat Deviren; Jenni M Buckley; Murat Pekmezci; R Trigg McClellan; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Integrated Fixation Cage Loosening Under Fatigue Loading.

Authors:  Srinidhi Nagaraja; Vivek Palepu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-28

Review 5.  [Postoperative compressive spinal epidural hematomas. 15 cases and a review of the literature].

Authors:  F Cabana; V Pointillart; J Vital; J Sénégas
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2000-06

6.  The presentation, incidence, etiology, and treatment of surgical site infections after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Albert F Pull ter Gunne; Ahmed S Mohamed; Richard L Skolasky; Cees J H M van Laarhoven; David B Cohen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Rates and causes of mortality associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a review of the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality Database.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Dwight Saulle; Ching-Jen Chen; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Manish K Kasliwal; Paul A Broadstone; Steven D Glassman; Alexander R Vaccaro; Christopher P Ames; Christopher I Shaffrey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  [Infections after reconstructive spinal interventions : How do I deal with them?]

Authors:  Burkhard Lehner; Michael Akbar; Nicholas A Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Microbiologic profile of infections in presumed aseptic revision spine surgery.

Authors:  Grant D Shifflett; Benjamin T Bjerke-Kroll; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Janina Kueper; Jayme Burket; Andrew A Sama; Federico P Girardi; Frank P Cammisa; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Incidence of low-grade infection in aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dirk Jan F Moojen; Gijs van Hellemondt; H Charles Vogely; Bart J Burger; Geert H I M Walenkamp; Niek J A Tulp; B Wim Schreurs; Frank R A J de Meulemeester; Corrie S Schot; Ingrid van de Pol; Takaaki Fujishiro; Leo M Schouls; Thomas W Bauer; Wouter J A Dhert
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.