Literature DB >> 29762132

Initial performance evaluation of a preclinical PET scanner available as a clip-on assembly in a sequential PET/MRI system.

J M Vrigneaud1, J McGrath, A Courteau, R Pegg, A Sanchez-Pastor Gomis, A Camacho, G Martin, N Schramm, F Brunotte.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance characteristics of a prototype preclinical PET scanner available as an easy clippable assembly that can dock to an MRI system. The single ring version of the PET system consists of eight detectors, each of which comprises a 12  ×  12 silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) array coupled with a dual layer of offset scintillation crystals to measure depth of interaction. The crystal arrays have 29  ×  29 (30  ×  30 for the outer layer) 4 mm long LYSO crystals (6 mm for the outer layer). The ring diameter is 119.2 mm and the axial field of view is 50.4 mm. The NEMA NU 4-2008 protocol was followed for studying the PET performance. Temperature stability of SiPMs was also investigated. The peak system absolute sensitivity was 4.70% with an energy window of 250-750 keV. The spatial resolution was 1.28/1.88/1.85 mm FWHM (radial/tangential/axial) at a distance of 5 mm from the center. Peak noise equivalent counting rate and scatter fraction for mouse phantom were 61.9 kcps at 14.9 MBq and 21.0%, respectively. The uniformity was 6.3% and the spill-over ratios in the images of the water-and air-filled chambers were 0.07 and 0.17, respectively. Recovery coefficients ranged from 0.13 to 0.96. Change in sensitivity as a function of ambient temperature was 0.3%/°C. These first results indicate excellent spatial resolution performance for use with animal studies. Moreover, the clippable assembly can be upgraded to accept a second ring of SiPMs modules, leading to improved sensitivity and axial coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29762132     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac4f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  6 in total

1.  Small animal, positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging system based on a clinical magnetic resonance imaging scanner: evaluation of basic imaging performance.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Patrick Ledden; Alexander V Stolin; Bob Hou; Ganghadar Jaliparthi; Peter F Martone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-09-08

2.  Optimization of a depth of interaction encoding PET block detector for a PET/MRI insert.

Authors:  Aaron R Selfridge; Simon R Cherry; Martin S Judenhofer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Advances in Preclinical PET.

Authors:  Stephen S Adler; Jurgen Seidel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.802

4.  NEMA characterization of the SAFIR prototype PET insert.

Authors:  Parisa Khateri; Werner Lustermann; Christian Ritzer; Charalampos Tsoumpas; Günther Dissertori
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  Performance evaluation of the mouse version of the LabPET II PET scanner.

Authors:  Émilie Gaudin; Christian Thibaudeau; Louis Arpin; Jean-Daniel Leroux; Maxime Toussaint; Jean-Francois Beaudoin; Jules Cadorette; Maxime Paillé; Catherine M Pepin; Konin Koua; Jonathan Bouchard; Nicolas Viscogliosi; Caroline Paulin; Réjean Fontaine; Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  H2RSPET: a 0.5 mm resolution high-sensitivity small-animal PET scanner, a simulation study.

Authors:  Youfang Lai; Qian Wang; Shiwei Zhou; Zhaoheng Xie; Jinyi Qi; Simon R Cherry; Mingwu Jin; Yujie Chi; Junwei Du
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.