E E Sigmund1,2, S H Baete3,4, K Patel3,5, D Wang3,5, D Stoffel3,4, R Otazo3,4,6, P Parasoglou3,4, J Bencardino3. 1. Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. eric.sigmund@nyumc.org. 2. Center for Advanced Imaging and Innovation (CAI2R), New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. eric.sigmund@nyumc.org. 3. Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 4. Center for Advanced Imaging and Innovation (CAI2R), New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. 5. NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA. 6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We describe measurement of skeletal muscle kinetics with multiple echo diffusion tensor imaging (MEDITI). This approach allows characterization of the microstructural dynamics in healthy and pathologic muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a Siemens 3-T Skyra scanner, MEDITI was used to collect dynamic DTI with a combination of rapid diffusion encoding, radial imaging, and compressed sensing reconstruction in a multi-compartment agarose gel rotation phantom and within in vivo calf muscle. An MR-compatible ergometer (Ergospect Trispect) was employed to enable in-scanner plantar flexion exercise. In a HIPAA-compliant study with written informed consent, post-exercise recovery of DTI metrics was quantified in eight volunteers. Exercise response of DTI metrics was compared with that of T2-weighted imaging and characterized by a gamma variate model. RESULTS: Phantom results show quantification of diffusivities in each compartment over its full dynamic rotation. In vivo calf imaging results indicate larger radial than axial exercise response and recovery in the plantar flexion-challenged gastrocnemius medialis (fractional response: nT2w = 0.385 ± 0.244, nMD = 0.163 ± 0.130, nλ1 = 0.110 ± 0.093, nλrad = 0.303 ± 0.185). Diffusion and T2-weighted response magnitudes were correlated (e.g., r = 0.792, p = 0.019 for nMD vs. nT2w). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of MEDITI for capturing spatially resolved diffusion tensor data in dynamic systems including post-exercise skeletal muscle recovery following in-scanner plantar flexion.
OBJECTIVES: We describe measurement of skeletal muscle kinetics with multiple echo diffusion tensor imaging (MEDITI). This approach allows characterization of the microstructural dynamics in healthy and pathologic muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a Siemens 3-T Skyra scanner, MEDITI was used to collect dynamic DTI with a combination of rapid diffusion encoding, radial imaging, and compressed sensing reconstruction in a multi-compartment agarose gel rotation phantom and within in vivo calf muscle. An MR-compatible ergometer (Ergospect Trispect) was employed to enable in-scanner plantar flexion exercise. In a HIPAA-compliant study with written informed consent, post-exercise recovery of DTI metrics was quantified in eight volunteers. Exercise response of DTI metrics was compared with that of T2-weighted imaging and characterized by a gamma variate model. RESULTS: Phantom results show quantification of diffusivities in each compartment over its full dynamic rotation. In vivo calf imaging results indicate larger radial than axial exercise response and recovery in the plantar flexion-challenged gastrocnemius medialis (fractional response: nT2w = 0.385 ± 0.244, nMD = 0.163 ± 0.130, nλ1 = 0.110 ± 0.093, nλrad = 0.303 ± 0.185). Diffusion and T2-weighted response magnitudes were correlated (e.g., r = 0.792, p = 0.019 for nMD vs. nT2w). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the feasibility of MEDITI for capturing spatially resolved diffusion tensor data in dynamic systems including post-exercise skeletal muscle recovery following in-scanner plantar flexion.
Authors: Deanna S Asakawa; Krishna S Nayak; Silvia S Blemker; Scott L Delp; John M Pauly; Dwight G Nishimura; Garry E Gold Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lukas Filli; Andreas Boss; Moritz C Wurnig; David Kenkel; Gustav Andreisek; Roman Guggenberger Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Kiril Schewzow; Georg Bernd Fiedler; Martin Meyerspeer; Sigrun Goluch; Elmar Laistler; Michael Wolzt; Ewald Moser; Albrecht Ingo Schmid Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eric E Sigmund; Dabang Sui; Obehi Ukpebor; Steven Baete; Els Fieremans; James S Babb; Michael Mechlin; Kecheng Liu; Jane Kwon; KellyAnne McGorty; Philip A Hodnett; Jenny Bencardino Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Melissa T Hooijmans; Jithsa R C Monte; Martijn Froeling; Sandra van den Berg-Faay; Vincent L Aengevaeren; Robert Hemke; Frank F Smithuis; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Adrianus J Bakermans; Mario Maas; Aart J Nederveen; Gustav J Strijkers Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 4.813