Literature DB >> 33713520

Measurement of Three-Dimensional Internal Dynamic Strains in the Intervertebral Disc of the Lumbar Spine With Mechanical Loading and Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel-Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Rajiv G Menon1, Marcelo V W Zibetti1, Martin Pendola2, Ravinder R Regatte1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive measurement of internal dynamic strain can be potentially useful to characterize spine intervertebral disc (IVD) in the setting of injury or degenerative disease.
PURPOSE: To develop and demonstrate a noninvasive technique to quantify three-dimensional (3D) internal dynamic strains in the IVD using a combination of static mechanical loading of the IVD using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible ergometer. STUDY TYPE: Prospective.
SUBJECTS: Silicone gel phantom studies were conducted to assess strain variation with load and repeatability. Mechanical testing was done on the phantoms to confirm MR results. Eight healthy human volunteers (four men and four woman, age = 29 ± 5 years) underwent MRI using a rest, static loading, and recovery paradigm. Repeatability tests were conducted in three subjects. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: MRI (3 T) with 3D continuous golden-angle radial sparse parallel (GRASP) and compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction. ASSESSMENT: CS reconstruction of the images, motion deformation, and Lagrangian strain maps were calculated for five IVD segments from L1/L2 to L5/S1. STATISTICAL TESTS: Ranges of displacement and strain in each subject and the resulting mean and standard deviation were calculated. Student t-tests were used to calculate changes in strain from loading to recovery. The correlation coefficient (CC) in the repeatability study was calculated.
RESULTS: The most compressive strain experienced by the IVD segments under loaded conditions was in the L4/L5 segment (-7.5 ± 2.9%). The change in minimum strain from load to recovery was the most for the L4/L5 segment (-7.5% to -5.0%, P = 0.026) and the least for the L1/L2 segment (-4.4% to -3.9%, P = 0.51). In vivo repeatability in three subjects shows strong correlation between scans in subjects done 6 months apart, with CCs equal to 0.86, 0.94, and 0.94 along principal directions. DATA
CONCLUSION: This study shows the feasibility of using static mechanical loading with continuous GRASP-MRI acquisition with CS reconstruction to measure 3D internal dynamic strains in the spine IVD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cartilage deformation; intervertebral disc; magnetic resonance imaging; strain

Year:  2021        PMID: 33713520      PMCID: PMC8277691          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  39 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  M A Adams; B J Freeman; H P Morrison; I W Nelson; P Dolan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  An FFT-based technique for translation, rotation, and scale-invariant image registration.

Authors:  B S Reddy; B N Chatterji
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 4.  Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review.

Authors:  Fahmi Khalifa; Ahmed Soliman; Ayman El-Baz; Mohamed Abou El-Ghar; Tarek El-Diasty; Georgy Gimel'farb; Rosemary Ouseph; Amy C Dwyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Biomechanics of the human intervertebral disc: A review of testing techniques and results.

Authors:  N Newell; J P Little; A Christou; M A Adams; C J Adam; S D Masouros
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-01-31

6.  Direct measurement of intervertebral disc maximum shear strain in six degrees of freedom: motions that place disc tissue at risk of injury.

Authors:  J J Costi; I A Stokes; M Gardner-Morse; J P Laible; H M Scoffone; J C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  In vivo tibiofemoral cartilage strain mapping under static mechanical loading using continuous GRASP-MRI.

Authors:  Rajiv G Menon; Marcelo V W Zibetti; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  End-plate displacement during compression of lumbar vertebra-disc-vertebra segments and the mechanism of failure.

Authors:  A D Holmes; D W Hukins; A J Freemont
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Rapid compositional mapping of knee cartilage with compressed sensing MRI.

Authors:  Marcelo V W Zibetti; Rahman Baboli; Gregory Chang; Ricardo Otazo; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  A framework for continuous target tracking during MR-guided high intensity focused ultrasound thermal ablations in the abdomen.

Authors:  Cornel Zachiu; Baudouin Denis de Senneville; Ivan D Dmitriev; Chrit T W Moonen; Mario Ries
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2017-10-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-Invasive Evaluation of Intradiscal Deformation during Axial Loading of the Spine Using Deformation-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Potential Tool for Micro-Instability Measurements.

Authors:  Frida Johansson; Zainab Sirat; Hanna Hebelka; Helena Brisby; Fredrik Nordström; Kerstin Lagerstrand
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.