| Literature DB >> 29759081 |
Marina Katsu1, Tetsuro Ohba2, Shigeto Ebata1, Hirotaka Haro1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identification of poor prognostic factors for OVF is important but has not yet been clearly established. Despite paraspinal muscles could play an important role in the etiology of OVF, what influence time-dependent changes in paraspinal muscles have after OVF, and the impact on conservative treatments for patients who have an OVF remain largely unknown. The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate time-dependent changes of the paraspinal musculature using MRI after injury in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs), and (2) compare paraspinal muscles between conservatively treated patients with OVF who have successful union and those failed to conservative treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Cross sectional area; Fat infiltration rate; Insufficient bone union; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoporotic vertebral fractures; Paraspinal muscles
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29759081 PMCID: PMC5952377 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2064-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Flow diagram showing the enrollment and assignment of patients
Fig. 2Measurement of the cross-sectional area on T1 axial image (a) and fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles using Image J (b). A = multifidi; B = erector spinae
C = psoas; D = quadratus lumborum. c Correlation between rCSA of total paraspinal muscles and BMD (YAM%)
Summary of the characteristics of each group
| Characteristic | Insufficient union ( | Union ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Agea y, mean ± SD | 75.9 ± 7.9 | 74.1 ± 11.2 | 0.41 |
| BMI, kg/m2, mean ± SD | 22.3 ± 2.9 | 22.4 ± 3.1 | 0.87 |
| Sex, female/male | 42/23 | 16/9 | 0.27 |
| BMD (%YAM), mean ± SD | 66.9 ± 16.3 | 69.2 ± 10.4 | 0.58 |
| Level of injury | |||
| Thoracolumbar junction level (T11–L2) | 60 (92%) | 22 (88%) | |
| Other level | 5 (8%) | 3 (12%) | |
| Genant’s classification | |||
| Minimal fracture | 9 (14%) | 15 (60%) | < 0.0001**** |
| Moderate fracture | 15 (23%) | 5 (20%) | 1.00 |
| Severe fracture | 41 (63%) | 5 (20%) | < 0.005*** |
| Grading of LSS severity | |||
| A | 33 (50%) | 11 (44%) | 0.64 |
| B | 12 (19%) | 5 (20%) | 1.00 |
| C | 20 (31%) | 8 (32%) | 0.44 |
| D | 0 | 1 (4%) | 0.27 |
| Type of braces | |||
| Custom-made hard braces | 17 (26%) | 6 (24%) | 1.00 |
| Elastic braces | 31 (48%) | 15 (60%) | 0.35 |
| No brace | 17 (26%) | 4 (16%) | 0.41 |
| Drug treatment | |||
| Teriparatide | 8 (12%) | 4 (16%) | 0.73 |
| Bisphosphonate | 11 (17%) | 5 (20%) | 0.76 |
| Denosumab | 5 (8%) | 2 (8%) | 1.00 |
| SERMs | 8 (12%) | 3 (12%) | 1.00 |
| No treatment | 30 (46%) | 11 (44%) | 1.00 |
BMI Body Mass Index, BMD bone mass density, YAM Young Adult Mean, LSS lumbar spinal stenosis, n number in group, SERMs selective estrogen receptor modulators
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0005, ****P < 0.0001
aMean ± standard deviation (SD)
Fig. 3a Correlation between the timing of MRI after the initial OVF injury and the FI% of the (a) multifidus muscle, (b) erector spinae, (c) psoas lumborum, and (d) quadratus
Fig. 4a Correlation between the timing of MRI after the initial OVF injury and the rCSA of the (a) multifidus muscle, (b) erector spinae, (c) psoas lumborum, and (d) quadratus. e Representative images of the time-dependent increase in FI%, but no change in rCSA of the multifidus and erector muscles
Fig. 5Graph comparing rCSA of the multifidus (a), erector spinae (b), psoas lumborum (c), and quadratus (d) between the groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ****P < 0.0001, NS denotes no significant difference). e Representative images of paraspinal muscles of patients in both groups