Literature DB >> 27421282

Magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar trunk parameters in chronic low backache patients and healthy population: a comparative study.

Roop Singh1, Sushil Kumar Yadav2, Sushma Sood3, Rohtas Kumar Yadav4, Ravi Rohilla5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the lumbar trunk parameters by MRI and investigate their association with chronic low backache.
METHODS: Fifty patients (26 males and 24 females) with mean age 33.54 ± 8.33 years with a history of low back pain (LBP) of minimum 3 consecutive months constituted the study group (Group A). To match with the study group, 15 normal healthy volunteers (9 males and 6 females) with no history of back pain were selected (Group B). Both the groups were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging of lumbosacral spine and lumbar trunk parameters were calculated.
RESULTS: Trunk width, depth and skin angle were comparable at L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc levels; significant difference with regard to disc angle of L3-L4 (p = 0.005) and L4-L5 (p = 0.02) and cross-sectional area (CSA) of disc at L4-L5 level (p = 0.01) was observed between two groups. There was a tendency of smaller CSA of paraspinal and abdominal oblique muscles in Group A patients, but the measurements were not statistically different from Group B patients. Rectus abdominis muscles showed a unique pattern of larger CSA at L3-L4 and L4-L5 disc levels and smaller CSA at L5-S1 in LBP patients. Intervertebral disc degenerative changes on MRI were observed in 27 (54 %) patients in the Group A; and none of the Group B participants showed degenerative changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Tendency of smaller trunk musculature CSA may be a cause or a result of chronic LBP. A unique pattern of larger CSA at L3-L4 and L4-L5 disc levels and smaller CSA at L5-S1 of Rectus abdominis muscles is observed in LBP patients compared to healthy persons. Differences in disc angles and CSA of disc at L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels between the two groups signify that these may be the predisposing factors leading to LBP due to abnormal load/stress transmission and precipitating early degenerative changes in the disc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross sectional area; Intervertebral disc; Low back pain; Lumbar trunk; Magnetic resonance imaging; Paraspinal muscles

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27421282     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4698-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation between the MRI changes in the lumbar multifidus muscles and leg pain.

Authors:  D F Kader; D Wardlaw; F W Smith
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  The lumbar paraspinal muscle morphometry of fast bowlers in cricket.

Authors:  Craig Ranson; Angus Burnett; Peter O'Sullivan; Mark Batt; Robert Kerslake
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.638

4.  Substantial asymmetry in paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area in healthy adults questions its value as a marker of low back pain and pathology.

Authors:  Riikka Niemeläinen; Marie-Michèle Briand; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The geometry of the muscles of the lumbar spine determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M F Tracy; M J Gibson; E P Szypryt; A Rutherford; E N Corlett
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The relative contributions of the disc and zygapophyseal joint in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A C Schwarzer; C N Aprill; R Derby; J Fortin; G Kine; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Fat content of lumbar paraspinal muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and in asymptomatic volunteers: quantification with MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Bernard Mengiardi; Marius R Schmid; Norbert Boos; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Achim Elfering; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  R Parkkola; U Rytökoski; M Kormano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Inflammatory pain pattern and pain with lumbar extension associated with Modic 1 changes on MRI: a prospective case-control study of 120 patients.

Authors:  F Bailly; J-Y Maigne; S Genevay; M Marty; F Gandjbakhch; S Rozenberg; V Foltz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Association between Cross-sectional Areas of Lumbar Muscles on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Chronicity of Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Hak Il Lee; Junyoung Song; Hee Song Lee; Jin Young Kang; Minyoung Kim; Ju Seok Ryu
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2011-12-30
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of yoga and dynamic neuromuscular stabilization exercise in chronic low back pain on magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar multifidus- protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Prem Venkatesan; Soundararajan K; Thomas J Kishen; Seema Janardhan; Sathish Kumar Cr
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  Which is the most affected muscle in lumbar back pain - multifidus or erector spinae?

Authors:  Pırıl Erbay Öztürk; Nilüfer Aylanç
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 3.  Changes in the macroscopic morphology of hip muscles in low back pain.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Pourahmadi; Mohammad Asadi; Jan Dommerholt; Ali Yeganeh
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Assessing lumbar paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area and fat composition with T1 versus T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: Reliability and concurrent validity.

Authors:  J R Cooley; J J Hebert; A de Zoete; T S Jensen; P R Algra; P Kjaer; B F Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparative study of the paraspinal muscles after OVF between the insufficient union and sufficient union using MRI.

Authors:  Marina Katsu; Tetsuro Ohba; Shigeto Ebata; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.