Literature DB >> 21217433

Characteristic radiographic or magnetic resonance images of fresh osteoporotic vertebral fractures predicting potential risk for nonunion: a prospective multicenter study.

Tadao Tsujio1, Hiroaki Nakamura, Hidetomi Terai, Masatoshi Hoshino, Takashi Namikawa, Akira Matsumura, Minori Kato, Akinobu Suzuki, Kazushi Takayama, Wakaba Fukushima, Kyoko Kondo, Yoshio Hirota, Kunio Takaoka.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study.
OBJECTIVE: To identify radiographic or magnetic resonance (MR) images of fresh vertebral fractures that can predict a high risk for delayed union or nonunion of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral body fractures are the most common fractures in osteoporosis patients. Conservative treatments are typically chosen for OVFs, and associated back pain generally subsides within several weeks with residual persistent deformity of the vertebral body. In some patients, OVF healing is impaired and correlated with prolonged back pain. However, assessments such as plain radiograph or MR images taken during the early phase to predict high risks for nonunions of OVFs and/or poor prognoses have not been identified.
METHODS: A total of 350 OVF patients from 25 institutes were enrolled in this clinical study. Plain radiograph and MR images of the OVFs were routinely taken at enrollment at the respective institutes. The findings on the plain radiograph and MR images were classified after enrollment in the study. All the patients were treated conservatively without any surgical intervention. After a 6-month follow-up, the patients were classified into two groups, a union group and a nonunion group, depending on the presence of an intravertebral cleft on plain radiograph or MR images. The associations of the images from the first visit with those of the corresponding nonunions at the 6-month follow-up were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression to elucidate specific image characteristics that may predict a high risk for nonunion of OVFs.
RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (49 vertebrae) among the 350 patients (363 vertebrae) were classified as nonunions, indicating a nonunion incidence of 13.5% for conventional conservative treatments for OVFs. The statistical analyses revealed that a vertebral fracture in the thoracolumbar spine, presence of a middle-column injury, and a confined high intensity or a diffuse low intensity area in the fractured vertebrae on T2-weighted MR images were significant risk factors for nonunion of OVFs.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study revealed significant relationships between plain radiograph and MR images of acute phase OVFs and the incidence of nonunion. As these risk factors are defined more clearly and further validated, they may become essential assessment tools for determining subsequent OVF treatments. Patients with one or more of the earlier-described risk factors for nonunion should be observed carefully and provided with more intensive treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21217433     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f29e8d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  41 in total

1.  The safety and efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for patients over 90 years old.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kamei; Tomoyuki Noguchi; Yoshitaka Shida; Takashi Okafuji; Kota Yokoyama; Fumiya Uchiyama; Hiroshi Nakatake; Tsuyoshi Tajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  New advances in imaging osteoporosis and its complications.

Authors:  James F Griffith; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  What are the predictors of clinical success after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures?

Authors:  Elsa Denoix; Flore Viry; Agnes Ostertag; Caroline Parlier-Cuau; Jean-Denis Laredo; Martine Cohen-Solal; Valérie Bousson; Thomas Funck-Brentano
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Predicting delayed union in osteoporotic vertebral fractures with consecutive magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  S Takahashi; M Hoshino; K Takayama; K Iseki; R Sasaoka; T Tsujio; H Yasuda; T Sasaki; F Kanematsu; H Kono; H Toyoda; H Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. A systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Muratore; Andrea Ferrera; Alessandro Masse; Alessandro Bistolfi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Time course of osteoporotic vertebral fractures by magnetic resonance imaging using a simple classification: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Takahashi; M Hoshino; K Takayama; K Iseki; R Sasaoka; T Tsujio; H Yasuda; T Sasaki; F Kanematsu; H Kono; H Toyoda; H Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Major surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the elderly: a comparison of anterior spinal fusion, anterior-posterior combined surgery and posterior closing wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Shota Takenaka; Yoshihiro Mukai; Noboru Hosono; Takeshi Fuji
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-06-09

8.  Late collapse osteoporotic vertebral fracture in an elderly patient with neurological compromise.

Authors:  D Ruiz Picazo; J Ramírez Villaescusa; E Portero Martínez; F Doñate Pérez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Can MRI predict subsequent pseudarthrosis resulting from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures?

Authors:  Hirotsugu Omi; Toru Yokoyama; Atsushi Ono; Takuya Numasawa; Kanichiro Wada; Yoichi Fujisawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Predictors of kyphotic deformity in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a radiological study.

Authors:  Sanganagouda Patil; Abhay M Nene
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.