Literature DB >> 35348911

The effects of cognitive load and encoding modality on prospective memory.

Guangzheng Li1, Mei Li2, Jin Wang2, Zhanyu Yu2, Hangjie Ma2, Bing Li3.   

Abstract

Successful execution of an intention as planned is necessary for people's normal life. However, people sometimes even forget intentions that they consider as very important. Hence, the issues that whether prospective memory performance can be improved under high cognitive load tasks are worth discussing. In this study, we used a 2 (cognitive load: high or standard) × 2 (encoding modality: verbal or enactment encoding) mixed design to explore the effects of encoding modality and cognitive load of ongoing tasks on prospective memory. The results showed that the prospective memory performance under high cognitive load condition was significantly worse than that under standard cognitive load condition for verbal encoding condition. However, for enactment encoding condition, enactment encoding enhanced the performance and abolished the difference between high and low cognitive load effects on prospective memory. Strategic issues of prospective memory will be discussed.
© 2022. Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive load; Enactment encoding; Multi-process theory; Prospective memory; Verbal encoding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35348911     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-022-01085-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  31 in total

1.  Prospective memory and aging: forgetting intentions over short delays.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel; M Manzi; B Cochran; M Baker
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-12

2.  The effect of perceptual distinctiveness on the prospective and retrospective components of prospective memory in young and old adults.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Roger A Dixon; D Stephen Lindsay; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-12

3.  Age-related deficits in prospective memory: the influence of task complexity.

Authors:  G O Einstein; L J Holland; M A McDaniel; M J Guynn
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-09

4.  Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

5.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

6.  Aging and prospective memory: the influence of increased task demands at encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  G O Einstein; R E Smith; M A McDaniel; P Shaw
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-09

7.  Strategic attention and decision control support prospective memory in a complex dual-task environment.

Authors:  Russell J Boag; Luke Strickland; Shayne Loft; Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-06-21

Review 8.  Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory.

Authors:  J Engelkamp
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1995-05

9.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

10.  Prospective memory errors in everyday life: does instruction matter?

Authors:  Maximilian Haas; Sascha Zuber; Matthias Kliegel; Nicola Ballhausen
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2020-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.