INTRODUCTION: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18-81 y), body mass index (19-53), QRS duration (66-150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37-77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S, and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/Tmax) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3-40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included RII, SII-aVL, TI, II, aVL, aVF, V3-V6, and R/Tmax perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0. CONCLUSION: Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility.
INTRODUCTION: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is a life-saving device. Recording of a specialized 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required for S-ICD eligibility assessment. The goals of this study were: (1) evaluate the effect of ECG filtering on S-ICD eligibility, and (2) simplify S-ICD eligibility assessment by development of an S-ICD ineligibility prediction tool, which utilizes the widely available routine 12-lead ECG. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective cross-sectional study participants [n = 68; 54% male; 94% white, with wide ranges of age (18-81 y), body mass index (19-53), QRS duration (66-150 ms), and left ventricular ejection fraction (37-77%)] underwent 12-lead supine, 3-lead supine and standing ECG recording. All 3-lead ECG recordings were assessed using the standard S-ICD pre-implantation ECG morphology screening. Backward, stepwise, logistic regression was used to build a model for 12-lead prediction of S-ICD eligibility. Select electrocardiogram waves and complexes: QRS, R-, S, and T-amplitudes on all 12 leads, averaged QT interval, QRS duration, and R/T ratio in the lead with the largest T wave (R/Tmax) were included as predictors. The effect of ECG filtering on ECG morphology was evaluated. A total of 9 participants (13%) failed S-ICD screening prior to filtering. Filtering at 3-40 Hz, similar to the S-ICD default, reduced S-ICD ineligibility to 4%. A regression model that included RII, SII-aVL, TI, II, aVL, aVF, V3-V6, and R/Tmax perfectly predicted S-ICD eligibility, with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 1.0. CONCLUSION: Routine clinical 12-lead ECG can be used to predict S-ICD eligibility. ECG filtering may improve S-ICD eligibility.
Authors: Martin C Burke; Michael R Gold; Bradley P Knight; Craig S Barr; Dominic A M J Theuns; Lucas V A Boersma; Reinoud E Knops; Raul Weiss; Angel R Leon; John M Herre; Michael Husby; Kenneth M Stein; Pier D Lambiase Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael R Gold; Johan D Aasbo; Mikhael F El-Chami; Mark Niebauer; John Herre; Jordan M Prutkin; Bradley P Knight; Steven Kutalek; Kevin Hsu; Raul Weiss; Eric Bass; Michael Husby; Timothy M Stivland; Martin C Burke Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Valentina Kutyifa; Christopher Beck; Mary W Brown; David Cannom; James Daubert; Mark Estes; Henry Greenberg; Ilan Goldenberg; Stephen Hammes; David Huang; Helmut Klein; Reinoud Knops; Mikhail Kosiborod; Jeanne Poole; Claudio Schuger; Jagmeet P Singh; Scott Solomon; David Wilber; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: SumChe Man; Annemijn M Algra; Charlotte A Schreurs; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Roderick W C Scherptong; Lieselot van Erven; Ernst E van der Wall; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Martin J Schalij; Cees A Swenne Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Lucas Boersma; Craig Barr; Reinoud Knops; Dominic Theuns; Lars Eckardt; Petr Neuzil; Marcoen Scholten; Margaret Hood; Juergen Kuschyk; Paul Jones; Elizabeth Duffy; Michael Husby; Kenneth Stein; Pier D Lambiase Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Louise R A Olde Nordkamp; Joppe L F Warnaars; Kirsten M Kooiman; Joris R de Groot; Boudewijn R A M Rosenmöller; Arthur A M Wilde; Reinoud E Knops Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-07
Authors: Luca Santini; Augusto Pappalardo; Valentina Schirripa; Nicola Danisi; Giovanni B Forleo; Fabrizio Ammirati Journal: HeartRhythm Case Rep Date: 2017-04-26
Authors: Linda Wang; Neeraj Javadekar; Ananya Rajagopalan; Nichole M Rogovoy; Kazi T Haq; Craig S Broberg; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Julian D Fortune; Natalie E Coppa; Kazi T Haq; Hetal Patel; Larisa G Tereshchenko Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2022-05-14 Impact factor: 7.027