Literature DB >> 17932025

Incorrect electrode cable connection during electrocardiographic recording.

Velislav N Batchvarov1, Marek Malik, A John Camm.   

Abstract

Incorrect electrode cable connections during electrocardiographic (ECG) recording can simulate rhythm or conduction disturbance, myocardial ischaemia and infarction, as well as other clinically important abnormalities. When only precordial or only limb cables, excluding the neutral cable, have been interchanged the waveforms in the different leads are re-arranged, inverted, or unchanged, whereas the duration of intervals is not changed. The mistake can be recognized by the presence of unusual P-QRS patterns (e.g. negative P-QRS in lead I or II, positive in lead AVR, P-QRS complexes of opposite direction in leads I and V6, etc.), change in the P-QRS axis, or abnormal precordial QRS-T wave progression. Interchange of limb cables with the neutral cable distorts Wilson's terminal and the morphology of all precordial and unipolar limb leads. The telltale sign of the mistake is the presence of (almost) a flat line in lead I, II or III. Interchange of even one of the limb cables, except for the neutral cable, with a precordial cable distorts the morphology of most leads and leaves not more than one lead (I, II, or III) unchanged. Computerized algorithms for detection of lead misplacement, such as those based on artificial neural networks, or on correlation between original and reconstructed leads, have been developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932025     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eum198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  9 in total

Review 1.  Technical mistakes during the acquisition of the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Javier García-Niebla; Pablo Llontop-García; Juan Ignacio Valle-Racero; Guillem Serra-Autonell; Velislav N Batchvarov; Antonio Bayés de Luna
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  How to interpret an electrocardiogram in children.

Authors:  L Lambrechts; B Fourie
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 3.  Main artifacts in electrocardiography.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Jason A Thomas; Erick Andres Perez-Alday; Christopher Hamilton; Muammar M Kabir; Eugene A Park; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  The electrocardiogram signal of Seba's short-tailed bat, Carollia perspicillata.

Authors:  Diana Mihova; Julio C Hechavarría
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Electrocardiography recordings in higher intercostal space for children with right ventricular outlet obstruction reconstruction operation.

Authors:  Jung Ok Kim; Yeo Hyang Kim; Myung Chul Hyun
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.243

7.  A mobile device system for early warning of ECG anomalies.

Authors:  Adam Szczepański; Khalid Saeed
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  An error in interpretation and real extraordinary electrocardiographic changes in patient with acute traumatic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kadir Karacali; Damla Yalcinkaya; Bilal Canberk Ilhan; Mikail Yarlioglues
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2022-09-03

9.  False Alarm Reduction in Self-Care by Personalized Automatic Detection of ECG Electrode Cable Interchanges.

Authors:  Jocelyne Fayn; Paul Rubel
Journal:  Int J Telemed Appl       Date:  2020-01-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.