Literature DB >> 28502872

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Post-Approval Study: Clinical characteristics and perioperative results.

Michael R Gold1, Johan D Aasbo2, Mikhael F El-Chami3, Mark Niebauer4, John Herre5, Jordan M Prutkin6, Bradley P Knight7, Steven Kutalek8, Kevin Hsu9, Raul Weiss10, Eric Bass11, Michael Husby12, Timothy M Stivland12, Martin C Burke13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) was developed to reduce short- and long-term complications associated with transvenous ICD leads. Early multicenter studies included younger patients with less left ventricular systolic dysfunction and fewer comorbidities than cohorts with traditional ICD.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize patient selection and the acute performance of the S-ICD in a contemporary real-world setting.
METHODS: The S-ICD Post-Approval Study is a prospective registry involving 86 US centers. Patients were enrolled if they met criteria for S-ICD implantation, passed an electrocardiogram screening test, and had a life expectancy of >1 year. Analyses of descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier time to event, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.
RESULTS: The study includes 1637 patients who underwent S-ICD implantation. The cohort included 68.6% (1123/1637) male patients, and 13.4% (220/1636) were receiving dialysis for end-stage renal disease. The mean age was 52 ± 15 years, with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 32.0% ± 14.6%. Electrocardiogram screening was successful for at least 1, 2, or 3 vectors in 100%, 93.8%, and 51.4% of patients, respectively. Medical imaging (65.1%, 1065/1636) and general anesthesia (64.1%, 1048/16) were used in a majority of patients, and 52.2% (855/1637) were implanted with the 2-incision technique. Induced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular tachycardia was successfully converted in 98.7% (1394/1412) of patients. The 30-day complication-free rate was 96.2%. Predictors of complications included diabetes, younger age, and higher body mass index.
CONCLUSION: Contemporary US patients with S-ICD have more comorbidities than do previous cohorts with S-ICD, but they are younger with more end-stage renal disease than do patients with transvenous ICD. Implantation success is high, and short-term complication rates are acceptable.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arrhythmia; Heart failure; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Registry; Subcutaneous ICD; Sudden cardiac death; Ventricular arrhythmia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28502872     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  29 in total

1.  Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Linda Wang; Neeraj Javadekar; Ananya Rajagopalan; Nichole M Rogovoy; Kazi T Haq; Craig S Broberg; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 2.  Electrical manipulation of the failing heart.

Authors:  Valerio Zacà; Theodore Murphy; Mauro Biffi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Device Management in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Brett G Angel; Heath Saltzman; Luke S Kusmirek
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Ventricular Fibrillation Conversion Testing After Implantation of a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Daniel J Friedman; Craig S Parzynski; E Kevin Heist; Andrea M Russo; Joseph G Akar; James V Freeman; Jeptha P Curtis; Sana M Al-Khatib
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Right versus left parasternal electrode position in the entirely subcutaneous ICD.

Authors:  Markus Bettin; Dirk Dechering; Gerrit Frommeyer; Robert Larbig; Andreas Löher; Florian Reinke; Julia Köbe; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Feasibility and safety of same day subcutaneous defibrillator implantation and send home (DASH) strategy.

Authors:  Toshimasa Okabe; Adrianne Miller; Tanner Koppert; Rafael Cavalcanti; Diego Alcivar-Franco; Jemina Osei; Omar Kahaly; Muhammad R Afzal; Jaret Tyler; Steven J Kalbfleisch; Raul Weiss; Mahmoud Houmsse; Ralph S Augostini; Emile G Daoud; Michael J Andritsos; Sujatha Bhandary; Galina Dimitrova; Kasey Fiorini; Hamdy Elsayed-Awad; Antolin Flores; Leonid Gorelik; Manoj H Iyer; Samiya Saklayen; Erica Stein; Katja Turner; William Perez; John D Hummel; Michael K Essandoh
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Jason A Thomas; Erick Andres Perez-Alday; Christopher Hamilton; Muammar M Kabir; Eugene A Park; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 8.  Updates on Device-Based Therapies for Patients with Heart Failure.

Authors:  Jad Al Danaf; Javed Butler; Amin Yehya
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-04

Review 9.  Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Domenico Corrado; Frank Marcus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique.

Authors:  Federico Migliore; Pietro De Franceschi; Manuel De Lazzari; Carlotta Miceli; Claudia Cataldi; Cinzia Crescenzi; Mauro Migliore; Demetrio Pittarello; Sabino Iliceto; Emanuele Bertaglia
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.