Literature DB >> 25908064

Safety and Efficacy of the Totally Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator: 2-Year Results From a Pooled Analysis of the IDE Study and EFFORTLESS Registry.

Martin C Burke1, Michael R Gold2, Bradley P Knight3, Craig S Barr4, Dominic A M J Theuns5, Lucas V A Boersma6, Reinoud E Knops7, Raul Weiss8, Angel R Leon9, John M Herre10, Michael Husby11, Kenneth M Stein11, Pier D Lambiase12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is the first implantable defibrillator that avoids placing electrodes in or around the heart. Two large prospective studies (IDE [S-ICD System IDE Clinical Investigation] and EFFORTLESS [Boston Scientific Post Market S-ICD Registry]) have reported 6-month to 1-year data on the S-ICD.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD in a large diverse population.
METHODS: Data from the IDE and EFFORTLESS studies were pooled. Shocks were independently adjudicated, and complications were measured with a standardized classification scheme. Enrollment date quartiles were used to assess event rates over time.
RESULTS: Eight hundred eighty-two patients who underwent implantation were followed for 651±345 days. Spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) events (n=111) were treated in 59 patients; 100 (90.1%) events were terminated with 1 shock, and 109 events (98.2%) were terminated within the 5 available shocks. The estimated 3-year inappropriate shock rate was 13.1%. Estimated 3-year, all-cause mortality was 4.7% (95% confidence interval: 0.9% to 8.5%), with 26 deaths (2.9%). Device-related complications occurred in 11.1% of patients at 3 years. There were no electrode failures, and no S-ICD-related endocarditis or bacteremia occurred. Three devices (0.3%) were replaced for right ventricular pacing. The 6-month complication rate decreased by quartile of enrollment (Q1: 8.9%; Q4: 5.5%), and there was a trend toward a reduction in inappropriate shocks (Q1: 6.9% Q4: 4.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The S-ICD demonstrated high efficacy for VT/VF. Complications and inappropriate shock rates were reduced consistently with strategic programming and as operator experience increased. These data provide further evidence for the safety and efficacy of the S-ICD. (Boston Scientific Post Market S-ICD Registry [EFFORTLESS]; NCT01085435; S-ICD® System IDE Clinical Study; NCT01064076).
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pacing; rhythm disorders; tachyarrhythmias; ventricular fibrillation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908064     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  102 in total

1.  The Entirely Subcutaneous Defibrillator - A New Generation and Future Expectations.

Authors:  Hussam Ali; Pierpaolo Lupo; Riccardo Cappato
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Current Review of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Jacinthe Boulet; Emmanuelle Massie; Blandine Mondésert; Yoan Lamarche; Michel Carrier; Anique Ducharme
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Alzheimer's disease: the impact of age-related changes in reproductive hormones.

Authors:  C S Atwood
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Conscious sedation during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular technique.

Authors:  Elif Kaya; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Obayda Azizy; Reza Wakili; Tienush Rassaf
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  The 18-fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission-tomography/computed tomography-guided treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis.

Authors:  Grzegorz Sławiński; Ewa Lewicka; Maciej Kempa; Szymon Budrejko; Alicja Dąbrowska-Kugacka; Grzegorz Romanowicz; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 6.  Comparing the safety of subcutaneous versus transvenous ICDs: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Su; Jia Guo; Yingqun Hao; Hong Tan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  [Current impact of cardiac implantable electronic devices].

Authors:  J Kuschyk; B Rudic; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Lead or be led: an update on leadless cardiac devices for general physicians.

Authors:  Benedict M Wiles; Paul R Roberts
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 9.  Anesthetic Management In Electrophysiology Laboratory: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Authors:  Mustafa Yildiz; Hulya Yilmaz Ak; Dogac Oksen; Sinan Oral
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-02-28

10.  The utility of routine clinical 12-lead ECG in assessing eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Authors:  Jason A Thomas; Erick Andres Perez-Alday; Christopher Hamilton; Muammar M Kabir; Eugene A Park; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.589

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.