Literature DB >> 2974633

Progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation. II. A comparison with isokinetic lifting in a disabled chronic low-back pain industrial population.

T G Mayer1, D Barnes, G Nichols, N D Kishino, K Coval, B Piel, D Hoshino, R J Gatchel.   

Abstract

The Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), as described in Part I of this series of articles, is a simplified test combining psychophysical and isoinertial protocols to provide an unconstrained lifting assessment. In the second part of this study, 100 chronically disabled low-back pain patients (57 men and 43 women) were studied at two points: 1) at initial evaluation, when referred for possible entry into a comprehensive Functional Restoration treatment program; and 2) at the conclusion of the treatment (an average 7 weeks later). Results of simultaneous lumbar PILE and Cybex Liftask (Lumex, Ronkonkoma, NY) tests are presented, showing that patients may frequently double or triple initial lifting capacity after undergoing the functional restoration training program, achieving lifting levels at or above normal for incumbent industrial workers. Overall, results demonstrate that the PILE test can be an effective baseline screening test for lifting capacity under certain circumstances. Although several drawbacks affecting the PILE as an isolated test are discussed, its usefulness as part of a battery of physical capacity tests making up a quantitative functional evaluation is clearly demonstrated. Finally, the potential use of PILE as a safe, inexpensive, simple, and relevant screening test for frequent lifting capacity in worker selection is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2974633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of isokinetic lifting and free lifting when applied to chronic low back pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Bouilland; P Loslever; F X Lepoutre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Course of low back pain among nurses: a longitudinal study across eight years.

Authors:  I Maul; T Läubli; A Klipstein; H Krueger
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Effect of computerized instructions on measurement of lift capacity: Safety, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  L N Matheson; R Danner; J Grant; V Mooney
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-06

6.  Relationships among age, body weight, resting heart rate, and performance in a new test of lift capacity.

Authors:  L N Matheson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-12

7.  Smartphone app in self-management of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H S Chhabra; Sunil Sharma; Shalini Verma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Assessing physical functioning on pain management programmes: the unique contribution of directly assessed physical performance measures and their relationship to self-reports.

Authors:  Beth J Guildford; Clair M Jacobs; Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt; Whitney Scott; Lance M McCracken
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2016-11-25

9.  Factors explaining improvement of isoinertial lifting-capacity.

Authors:  Katharina von Garnier; Thomas Ewert; Robert Freumuth; Heribert Limm; Gerold Stucki
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-11-03

10.  Subacute and chronic, non-specific back and neck pain: cognitive-behavioural rehabilitation versus primary care. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Odd Lindell; Sven-Erik Johansson; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.