Literature DB >> 28386404

Assessing physical functioning on pain management programmes: the unique contribution of directly assessed physical performance measures and their relationship to self-reports.

Beth J Guildford1, Clair M Jacobs1, Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt1, Whitney Scott2, Lance M McCracken3.   

Abstract

Physical functioning is a recommended outcome domain for pain management programmes. It can be assessed by self-report and by direct assessment of performance. Although physical performance measures may provide unique and useful information about patient functioning over and above self-report measures, it is not entirely clear which of the many possible performances to assess. This study investigated a battery of three directly assessed physical performance measures and their relationship to three currently used self-report measures of general health and functioning. The three performance measures were sensitive to treatment; patients performed significantly better on all three measures following completion of the pain management programme. The three performance measures were shown to represent a single underlying dimension, and there was a significant degree of overlap between them. The performance measures were shown to be relevant in explaining variation in the self-report measures, as well as to offer a clinically relevant different dimension of assessment to self-report. Future research could focus on developing performance-based measures that capture quality of movement and that are sensitive to relevant processes of therapeutic change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; assessment; pain management programme; performance measures; physical functioning; physiotherapy; self-report

Year:  2016        PMID: 28386404      PMCID: PMC5370627          DOI: 10.1177/2049463716680559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  32 in total

1.  The usability of six physical performance tasks in a rehabilitation population with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Rob J E M Smeets; Helma J M Hijdra; Arnold D M Kester; Minou W G C Hitters; J André Knottnerus
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Self-reports and clinician-measured physical function among patients with low back pain: a comparison.

Authors:  C E Lee; M J Simmonds; D M Novy; S Jones
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Acceptance-based treatment for persons with complex, long standing chronic pain: a preliminary analysis of treatment outcome in comparison to a waiting phase.

Authors:  Lance M McCracken; Kevin E Vowles; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2005-01-07

5.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; K M Ryan
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.473

7.  Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  M J Simmonds; S L Olson; S Jones; T Hussein; C E Lee; D Novy; H Radwan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Psychological flexibility and traditional pain management strategies in relation to patient functioning with chronic pain: an examination of a revised instrument.

Authors:  Lance M McCracken; Kevin E Vowles
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain.

Authors:  Gabriel Tan; Mark P Jensen; John I Thornby; Bilal F Shanti
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain.

Authors:  Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis Revicki; Gale Harding; Laurie B Burke; David Cella; Charles S Cleeland; Penney Cowan; John T Farrar; Sharon Hertz; Mitchell B Max; Bob A Rappaport
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analgesic reduction during an interdisciplinary pain management programme: treatment effects and processes of change.

Authors:  Beth J Guildford; Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt; Bethany Hill; Karen Sanderson; Lance M McCracken
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2017-10-02

2.  Avoidance, pacing, or persistence in multidisciplinary functional rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain: An observational study with cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

Authors:  François Luthi; Philippe Vuistiner; Christine Favre; Roger Hilfiker; Bertrand Léger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Psychosocial Correlates of Objective, Performance-Based, and Patient-Reported Physical Function Among Patients with Heterogeneous Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Jonathan Greenberg; Ryan A Mace; Paula J Popok; Ronald J Kulich; Kushang V Patel; John W Burns; Tamara J Somers; Francis J Keefe; Michael E Schatman; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Assessing the Functional Status of Patients with Chronic Pain-Cross Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Pain Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Aleksandar Knežević; Petar Čolović; Milica Jeremić-Knežević; Čila Demeši-Drljan; Dušica Simić-Panić; Randy Neblett
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.