| Literature DB >> 28386404 |
Beth J Guildford1, Clair M Jacobs1, Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt1, Whitney Scott2, Lance M McCracken3.
Abstract
Physical functioning is a recommended outcome domain for pain management programmes. It can be assessed by self-report and by direct assessment of performance. Although physical performance measures may provide unique and useful information about patient functioning over and above self-report measures, it is not entirely clear which of the many possible performances to assess. This study investigated a battery of three directly assessed physical performance measures and their relationship to three currently used self-report measures of general health and functioning. The three performance measures were sensitive to treatment; patients performed significantly better on all three measures following completion of the pain management programme. The three performance measures were shown to represent a single underlying dimension, and there was a significant degree of overlap between them. The performance measures were shown to be relevant in explaining variation in the self-report measures, as well as to offer a clinically relevant different dimension of assessment to self-report. Future research could focus on developing performance-based measures that capture quality of movement and that are sensitive to relevant processes of therapeutic change.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic pain; assessment; pain management programme; performance measures; physical functioning; physiotherapy; self-report
Year: 2016 PMID: 28386404 PMCID: PMC5370627 DOI: 10.1177/2049463716680559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Pain ISSN: 2049-4637