I Maul1, T Läubli, A Klipstein, H Krueger. 1. Institute of Hygiene and Applied Physiology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Clausiusstr. 25, Switzerland. Irina.Maul@web.de
Abstract
AIMS: To describe the course of low back pain (LBP) among nurses across eight years. METHODS: A longitudinal study was performed with a follow up at 1 and 8 years among nurses employed by a large university hospital in Switzerland. A modified version of the Nordic Questionnaire was distributed to obtain information about demographic data, occupational activities, and various aspects of LBP. A clinical examination and several functional tests were used to overcome the problems associated with subjective pain reporting. Nurses having answered the questionnaire on all three occasions (n = 269) were classified into subgroups according to their pain intensity. For each subgroup the course of LBP was recorded. RESULTS: LBP was highly prevalent with an annual prevalence varying from 73% to 76%. A large percentage (38%) indicated the same intensity of LBP on all three occasions. The proportion of nurses reporting repeated increase of LBP (19%) was approximately as large as the proportion who complained about repeated decrease of LBP (17%). CONCLUSION: It became evident that LBP poses a persistent problem among nurses. Over an eight year period almost half of the nurses indicated the same intensity of LBP, thus supporting a recurrent rather than a progressive nature of LBP.
AIMS: To describe the course of low back pain (LBP) among nurses across eight years. METHODS: A longitudinal study was performed with a follow up at 1 and 8 years among nurses employed by a large university hospital in Switzerland. A modified version of the Nordic Questionnaire was distributed to obtain information about demographic data, occupational activities, and various aspects of LBP. A clinical examination and several functional tests were used to overcome the problems associated with subjective pain reporting. Nurses having answered the questionnaire on all three occasions (n = 269) were classified into subgroups according to their pain intensity. For each subgroup the course of LBP was recorded. RESULTS: LBP was highly prevalent with an annual prevalence varying from 73% to 76%. A large percentage (38%) indicated the same intensity of LBP on all three occasions. The proportion of nurses reporting repeated increase of LBP (19%) was approximately as large as the proportion who complained about repeated decrease of LBP (17%). CONCLUSION: It became evident that LBP poses a persistent problem among nurses. Over an eight year period almost half of the nurses indicated the same intensity of LBP, thus supporting a recurrent rather than a progressive nature of LBP.
Authors: M Estryn-Behar; M Kaminski; E Peigne; M F Maillard; A Pelletier; C Berthier; M F Delaporte; M C Paoli; J M Leroux Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 1990 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: T G Mayer; D Barnes; G Nichols; N D Kishino; K Coval; B Piel; D Hoshino; R J Gatchel Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 1988-09 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Lauren E Griffith; Harry S Shannon; Richard P Wells; Stephen D Walter; Donald C Cole; Pierre Côté; John Frank; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Lacey E Langlois Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: A Van Nieuwenhuyse; P R Somville; G Crombez; A Burdorf; G Verbeke; K Johannik; O Van den Bergh; R Masschelein; Ph Mairiaux; G F Moens Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Leonid Kalichman; Ling Li; David H Kim; Ali Guermazi; Valery Berkin; Christopher J O'Donnell; Udo Hoffmann; Rob Cole; David J Hunter Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 3.468