Literature DB >> 29744451

Biofunctional Mg coating on PEEK for improving bioactivity.

Xiaoming Yu1, Muhammad Ibrahim1,2, Zongyuan Liu1, Huazhe Yang3, Lili Tan1, Ke Yang1.   

Abstract

High purity Mg was successfully coated on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) by vapor deposition method in order to improve the bioactivity including antibacterial property of PEEK implant. The morphology and elemental composition of the coating were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), showing that the coating was mainly composed of Mg at deposition temperature of 175 °C, 185 °C, 200 °C and 230 °C. The higher the substrate temperature was, the larger the Mg particle size was. The coating degraded and gradually peeled off from the surface of PEEK after up to 21 days' immersion. It was found that the degradation of Mg coating could strongly kill Staphylococcus aureus with antibacterial rate reaching to 99%. Mg can be expected to be coated on those bio-inert biomaterials to offer specific bioactivities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibacterial activity; Coating; Mg; PEEK; Vapor deposition

Year:  2018        PMID: 29744451      PMCID: PMC5935772          DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioact Mater        ISSN: 2452-199X


Introduction

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with reasonable biocompatibility and suitable Young's modulus to human bone is regarded as one of the most potential candidates for spinal, trauma, oral implantology and orthopedic applications [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. However, PEEK is a kind of bioinert material which induces bad bonding with peripheral tissue, resulting in aseptic loosening even implantation failure [5]. Therefore, some bioactive materials such as HA are usually utilized to form PEEK composites in order to improve their bioactivity [[6], [7], [8], [9]]. Nevertheless, the weak physical bonding between HA and PEEK causes compromised mechanical properties. Meanwhile, various biocompatible materials such as TiO2 [10], Ti [11], Ta [12]and carbon [13] were also employed by plasma treatment [14,15] to improve the biocompatibility. In addition, as serious postoperative complications, bacterial infection after implantation has become an important problem which needs to be solved. Magnesium (Mg) as a novel biodegradable metal is breaking the current knowledge of corrosion resistant metallic biomaterials. The current application of biodegradable implants is to support the tissue regeneration and heal the specific trauma during degradation. Nowadays, Mg based metals have become most promising candidates for medical applications owing to their character of biodegradation [[16], [17], [18]], and biofunctions of anti-tumor [[19], [20], [21]], antimicrobial [[22], [23], [24], [25], [26]], osteogenesis inductivity [[27], [28], [29], [30]] and others [[31], [32], [33]]. However, the relative low strength has restricted their application in load-bearing position. Mg based metals in form of bulk have been widely investigated, while the study of Mg coating is relatively rare. Since the degradation behavior of Mg is dramatically affected by galvanic corrosion and high purity magnesium possesses superior corrosion resistance, pure Mg was deposited on Mg alloy to improve the corrosion resistance [34,35]. The biological performance is reflected through surface of materials. Therefore, bioactivity of surface becomes very important for biomaterials. As a kind of bioactive material, pure Mg can be coated on the bioinert materials to improve their surface bioactivity. High purity Mg film was deposited on the oxidized Si wafer by physical vapor deposition technique, and both in vitro and in vivo tests demonstrated acceptable foreign body reaction [36]. Li et al. [37] reported that Mg was coated on porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds by arc ion plating, which made them showing better osteogenic properties than that the porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds. In this study, high purity Mg was deposited on PEEK substrate, and then surface coating was characterized, which would be a new way to improve the bioactivity of PEEK for medical application.

Experimental

Material and coating

A high purity (99.99 wt%) Mg block was employed as evaporation resource. Mg block was placed in a ceramic crucible located inside the furnace at temperature of 175 °C, 185 °C, 200 °C and 230 °C. A commercial PEEK substrate was cut into size of Ф160 mm × 2 mm. The surface was grounded up to 2000 grit sand paper, and then mirror polished with 1 μm diamond grinding paste. The substrates were cleaned ultrasonically in acetone and deionized water, dried by flow N2 gas, then the substrates were placed in the deposition zone at temperature of 150 °C. The working pressure was controlled at about 1Pa. The generated Mg vapor was spontaneously condensed on the surface of the substrate due to the temperature gradient. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) was employed to investigate the surface morphology of the coating.

Immersion test

The Mg coated PEEK samples were subjected to an immersion test in Hank's solution at 37 ± 0.5 °C with an extraction ratio of 1.25 cm2/mL up to 21 days. The pH values of the Hank's solution were monitored and the Hank's solution was refreshed every day.

Antibacterial test

Each experimental sample was placed in a centrifuge tube immerging in a (1–2) × 105 cfu/mL Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) suspension with a ratio of 1.25 cm2/mL, and then samples were incubated at 37 ± 0.5 °C for 6 h, 12 h and 24 h, respectively. The co-cultured bacterial suspensions were diluted to (1–2) × 103 cfu/mL. 0.1 mL of the diluted bacterial suspension was added onto the nutrition agar plate and spread evenly, which was incubated again at 37 ± 0.5 °C for another 24 h, and then the bacterial colonies were counted. The antibacterial rate was determined by the following equation:where C is the antibacterial rate, A is the number of bacterial colonies for the uncoated PEEK sample, and B denotes the number of bacterial colonies for the Mg coated PEEK sample.

Results and discussion

Surface morphology

The surface morphologies of Mg coating on PEEK substrate at different temperature of 175 °C, 185 °C, 200 °C and 230 °C are shown in Fig. 1 showing that the PEEK surface was fully covered by Mg particles. It can be seen that the coating is uniform and dense. The EDS analysis showed that the coating was pure Mg (Fig. 1e). The size of particle was changed with the temperature of substrate. The particle size was 5–15 μm on the substrate at 175 °C. Increasing the temperature to 200 °C, there was no obvious change on the particle size. However, the particle size was increased to 30–50 μm when the substrate temperature reached to 230 °C. Atsushi et al. [38] obtained a similar result. The different particle size could affect the degradation rate of Mg coating.
Fig. 1

Surface morphologies of Mg coating fabricated at different temperatures, (a) 175 °C; (b) 185 °C; (c) 200 °C; (d) 230 °C; (e) EDS analysis.

Surface morphologies of Mg coating fabricated at different temperatures, (a) 175 °C; (b) 185 °C; (c) 200 °C; (d) 230 °C; (e) EDS analysis. Fig. 2 shows the pH changes of Hanks' solution immersed with Mg coated samples at different temperatures. Higher pH value represents higher degradation rate. At the first day, the pH rapidly reached to about 11 for all the samples. The pH slowly decreased down to 10 from day 2 to day 7, and then was steady at around 10. After 14 days, the coating began to peel off from the surface of PEEK, and pH dropped to 9.5. From day 14 to day 21, the Mg coating broke into pieces. The Mg coating completely vanished after 21 days. At day 1, the pH of coating deposited at 230 °C and 185 °C was higher than that of other samples. The Mg particles deposited at 230 °C were larger and the distance between particles was also larger, as shown in Fig. 1d, thus the contact area with solution was large, which increased the degradation rate. For the sample deposited at 185 °C, particles were small but the surface was relatively loose, so it was easy to degrade. The drop of pH was derived from the protection of degradation product which decreased the degradation rate of Mg coating. The surface of the sample deposited at 200 °C was more dense than the others, so the pH was the lowest. From day 4, the pH of sample deposited at 230 °C was steady at around 10 and it was the last one to completely peel off, so 230 °C was an optimal deposition temperature for the relatively long time implant.
Fig. 2

pH changes of Hanks' solution immersed with Mg coated samples at different temperatures.

pH changes of Hanks' solution immersed with Mg coated samples at different temperatures. Compared with the Mg coated Ti6Al4V alloy by arc ion plating method [37], the degradation period of Mg coating on PEEK was obviously longer. The pH of Mg coated Ti6Al4V alloy rapidly dropped to 8 at day 4, while the pH of Mg coated PEEK was still around 10 on the last stage. Besides the different intrinsic morphology for different deposition, galvanic corrosion would not take place for the Mg coated PEEK, so the degradation rate was much lower.

Antibacterial activity

Over fast degradation rate is still the main problem of Mg. Therefore, the sample with the deposition temperature of 230 °C which possess relative good anticorrosion property is adopted for antibacterial test. Fig. 3 shows the antibacterial effects of PEEK with and without Mg coating co-cultured with S. aureus at 37 °C for 6 h, 12 h and 24 h. After co-culturing for 6 h, there was much bacteria on the medium cultured with uncoated PEEK, while there was less bacterial colony for the Mg coated PEEK. After co-culturing for 12 h, the number of bacterial colonies was increasing, while there was only one bacterial colony for the Mg coated sample. As for 24 h, there was no obvious change for PEEK, and there was no bacterial for Mg coated PEEK. PEEK is a bio-inert material without antibacterial function. With the degradation of Mg coating, the strong alkaline environment could kill most bacteria. The antibacterial rate Mg coated sample was 78% for 6 h. When co-cultured for 12 h and 24 h, the antibacterial rate reached to 99%. At the whole degradation period of Mg coating, the pH was kept at relatively high level. Therefore, the antibacterial activity would be maintained until the complete degradation of Mg coating.
Fig. 3

Antibacterial effects of PEEK with and without Mg coating co-cultured with S. aureus at 37 °C for 6 h, 12 h and 24 h

Antibacterial effects of PEEK with and without Mg coating co-cultured with S. aureus at 37 °C for 6 h, 12 h and 24 h

Conclusion

In this preliminary study, pure Mg was coated on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) substrate by vapor deposition method. The optimal substrate temperature was 230 °C, and the Mg coating on PEEK would sustain at least for 14 days in Hank's solution. Mg coated PEEK exhibited excellent antibacterial property with antibacterial rate reaching to 99%. By vapor deposition method, biofunctional Mg may be coated on various bio-inert medical materials to improve their bioactivities.
  25 in total

1.  Mechanical and biological characteristics of diamond-like carbon coated poly aryl-ether-ether-ketone.

Authors:  Huaiyu Wang; Ming Xu; Wei Zhang; Dixon T K Kwok; Jiang Jiang; Zhengwei Wu; Paul K Chu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Short-term effect of magnesium implantation on the osteomyelitis modeled animals induced by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jinhao Zeng; Ling Ren; Yajiang Yuan; Yansong Wang; Jianbo Zhao; Ruming Zeng; Ke Yang; Xifan Mei
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  The effect of metallic magnesium degradation products on osteoclast-induced osteolysis and attenuation of NF-κB and NFATc1 signaling.

Authors:  Zanjing Zhai; Xinhua Qu; Haowei Li; Ke Yang; Peng Wan; Lili Tan; Zhengxiao Ouyang; Xuqiang Liu; Bo Tian; Fei Xiao; Wengang Wang; Chuan Jiang; Tingting Tang; Qiming Fan; An Qin; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Nonlinear association between magnesium intake and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xinhua Qu; Fangchun Jin; Yongqiang Hao; Zhenan Zhu; Huiwu Li; Tingting Tang; Kerong Dai
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites.

Authors:  K L Wong; C T Wong; W C Liu; H B Pan; M K Fong; W M Lam; W L Cheung; W M Tang; K Y Chiu; K D K Luk; W W Lu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Enhancement of CRF-PEEK osseointegration by plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite: A rabbit model.

Authors:  Felicia Suska; Omar Omar; Lena Emanuelsson; Mark Taylor; Philipp Gruner; Amy Kinbrum; Duncan Hunt; Trevor Hunt; Andy Taylor; Anders Palmquist
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 7.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 8.  Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics.

Authors:  Shariq Najeeb; Muhammad S Zafar; Zohaib Khurshid; Fahad Siddiqui
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.642

9.  Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Xiaomian Wu; Xiaochen Liu; Jie Wei; Jian Ma; Feng Deng; Shicheng Wei
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-03-05

10.  Novel Bio-functional Magnesium Coating on Porous Ti6Al4V Orthopaedic Implants: In vitro and In vivo Study.

Authors:  Xiaokang Li; Peng Gao; Peng Wan; Yifeng Pei; Lei Shi; Bo Fan; Chao Shen; Xin Xiao; Ke Yang; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Strontium ranelate incorporated 3D porous sulfonated PEEK simulating MC3T3-E1 cell differentiation.

Authors:  Yingxiao Sun; Xingdan Liu; Ji Tan; Dan Lv; Wengang Song; Rui Su; Ling Li; Xuanyong Liu; Liping Ouyang; Yun Liao
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2020-11-28

Review 2.  Biofunctional magnesium coating of implant materials by physical vapour deposition.

Authors:  Qingchuan Wang; Weidan Wang; Yanfang Li; Weirong Li; Lili Tan; Ke Yang
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-09-28

3.  Preparation, Characterization and In Vitro Biological Evaluation of a Novel Pearl Powder/Poly-Amino Acid Composite as a Potential Substitute for Bone Repair and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Yanan Wu; Zhengwen Ding; Haohao Ren; Mizhi Ji; Yonggang Yan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 4.  Review on Development and Dental Applications of Polyetheretherketone-Based Biomaterials and Restorations.

Authors:  Ludan Qin; Shuo Yao; Jiaxin Zhao; Chuanjian Zhou; Thomas W Oates; Michael D Weir; Junling Wu; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Biological evaluation of the modified nano-amorphous phosphate calcium doped with citrate/poly-amino acid composite as a potential candidate for bone repair and reconstruction.

Authors:  Xiaomei Wang; Dechuan Zhao; Haohao Ren; Yonggang Yan; Shuyang Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Bioinspired Modifications of PEEK Implants for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Xinming Gu; Xiaolin Sun; Yue Sun; Jia Wang; Yiping Liu; Kaixuan Yu; Yao Wang; Yanmin Zhou
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-12

Review 7.  A review on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Wen Wang; Jia Liu; Liqiang Wang; Yujin Tang; Kuaishe Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 8.  Pearl Powder-An Emerging Material for Biomedical Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Xian Jun Loh; David James Young; Hongchen Guo; Liang Tang; Yunlong Wu; Guorui Zhang; Changming Tang; Huajun Ruan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.