| Literature DB >> 36051586 |
Ting Zhang1, Wen Wang1, Jia Liu2, Liqiang Wang3, Yujin Tang2, Kuaishe Wang1.
Abstract
Magnesium (Mg) and Mg alloys are considered as potential candidates for biomedical applications because of their high specific strength, low density, and elastic modulus, degradability, good biocompatibility and biomechanical compatibility. However, the rapid corrosion rate of Mg alloys results in premature loss of mechanical integrity, limiting their clinical application in load-bearing parts. Besides, the low strength of Mg alloys restricts their further application. Thus, it is essential to understand the characteristics and influencing factors of mechanical and corrosion behavior, as well as the methods to improve the mechanical performances and corrosion resistance of Mg alloys. This paper reviews the recent progress in elucidating the corrosion mechanism, optimizing the composition, and microstructure, enhancing the mechanical performances, and controlling the degradation rate of Mg alloys. In particular, the research progress of surface modification technology of Mg alloys is emphasized. Finally, the development direction of biomedical Mg alloys in the future is prospected.Entities:
Keywords: biomedical applications; corrosion resistance; magnesium alloy; microsturcture and properties; surface modification
Year: 2022 PMID: 36051586 PMCID: PMC9424554 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Advantages of Mg alloys for biomedical applications.
| Advantages | Description | References |
|---|---|---|
| Low density and elastic modulus | Density and elastic modulus are similar to those of cortical bone |
|
| High specific strength | The strength to weight ratio is approximately 35–260 kNm/kg |
|
| Machinability | Mg has excellent machinability, is easy to achieve stable dimensions and can be easily processed into complex shapes |
|
| Stress shielding effect | The elastic modulus of Mg is very close to that of bone, many problems associated with implant stress shielding can be greatly reduced |
|
| Biocompatibility | Mg is biocompatible and has been shown to have osteogenic functions |
|
| Degradability | Mg eventually degrade completely in the body, which is beneficial to the patient |
|
Disadvantages of Mg alloys for biomedical applications.
| Disadvantages | Description | References |
|---|---|---|
| Low mechanical properties | Implants generally need to be able to withstand a certain load and deformation. At present, it is difficult for most Mg alloys to meet clinical needs in both strength and plasticity |
|
| High degradation rate | It is easy to cause premature loss of mechanical integrity and support of implants, which restricts its application in clinical treatment, especially in orthopedic load-bearing parts |
|
| Hydrogen (H2) | H2 released during Mg degradation accumulates in the surrounding soft tissue |
|
FIGURE 1(A–D) Schematic illustration of the biocorrosion at the interface between Mg and medium. Reprinted with permission from reference (Zheng et al., 2014), Elsevier.
Effects of common alloying elements on performances of Mg alloys.
| Alloying elements | Biocompatibility | Corrosion resistance | Mechanical performances | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Ai is neurotoxic, it may cause Alzheimer’s disease and damages muscle fibers | It is beneficial for corrosion resistance | The addition of Al increases the strength and plasticity |
|
| Zn | Zn is an essential trace element for human body, with non-cytotoxic and good biocompatibility | It makes the corrosion resistance decreases with the increase of Zn content | Zn mainly plays the role of solid solution strengthening, and the strength increases with the increase of Zn content |
|
| Mn | Mn is an essential trace element for human body. However, it has been reported that Mn is cytotoxic and neurotoxic | It is beneficial for the corrosion resistance | It increases yield strength, and decreases tensile strength and elongation |
|
| Ca | Ca is an important component of human bone, with non-cytotoxic | It makes the corrosion resistance reduces with increasing Ca content | It makes the strength increases and plasticity reduces with increasing Ca content |
|
| Sr | Sr is an important component of human bone, with non-cytotoxic. It can promote bone formation | It makes the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys reduces with increasing Sr content | It makes the strength increases with increasing Sr conten.t |
|
| Zr | Zr has good biocompatibility and bone bonding ability | It makes the corrosion resistance reduces with increasing Zr content | It makes the grains refine, strength and plasticity increase |
|
| Si | Si is an essential trace element for human body | It reduces the corrosion resistance | It produces coarse Mg2Si phase, increases strength and decreases plasticity |
|
| Li | Li may cause malformation of human cardiovascular system | It reduces the corrosion resistance | When the addition amount of Li exceeds 5.5%, the microstructure changes, the strength decreases and the plasticity increases |
|
| Nd | Nd is cytotoxic at high concentration, while it has good biosafety at low concentration | It improves the corrosion resistance | It makes the new phases form, microstructure refine, mechanical performances improve |
|
| Y | Y has good biocompatibility | It improves the corrosion resistance | It increases the strength and plasticity |
|
| Ce | Ce is high cytotoxic | It improves the corrosion resistance, while more amount reduces corrosion resistance | It improves the strength and fatigue resistance |
|
| La | La is higher cytotoxic | It improves the corrosion resistance | It improves the strength and creep resistance |
|
| Er | Er is cytotoxic | It improves the corrosion resistance | It improves strength and plasticity |
|
| Gd | Gd is cytotoxic | It improves corrosion resistance, which decreases when Gd content is high | It improves strength due to solid solution strengthening |
|
FIGURE 2SEM images: (A,C) PCC coated surface and (B,D) cross-section of LAT971 and LATZ9531; EDS spectrum: (E) LAT971 and (F) LATZ9531 alloy; SEM images after corrosion test: (G,H) uncoated and (I,J) PCC coated LAT971 and LAT9531, respectively. Reprinted with permission from reference (Maurya et al., 2018), Elsevier.
FIGURE 3Fluorescence images of live/dead staining of cells after cultured on the different samples. Reprinted with permission from reference (Dong et al., 2022b), Elsevier.
FIGURE 4The schematic diagrams of (A) MAO device, (B) growth model; the corrosion mechanism of MAO coating: (C) thin coating with through-pores; (D) thicker coating with complex pores. Reprinted with permission from reference (Liu et al., 2020a), Elsevier.
FIGURE 5Schematic diagrams of the degradation mechanism of porous MAO/PLLA composite coatings on Mg-1Li-1Ca alloys: (A) swelling of PLLA and corrosion of the substrate, and (B) blistering and final peeling-off of PLLA; (C) RGR and (D) proliferation and differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured for different times in different extracts. Error bars represent ± S for n = 5 and 3, respectively, and p < 0.05, as indicated by the asterisk (*); SEM images of (E) the MAO coatings; (F) the MAO/PLLA composite coatings, (G,H) the high magnification view of e and f, respectively. Reprinted with permission from reference (Zeng et al., 2016), American Chemical Society.
FIGURE 6(A) Schematic illustration of preparation processes of the sol-gel coatings; (B–F) bioactive glass scaffolds with porous structure produced by sol-gel methods, and (G) micro-computed tomography image of typical scaffold and human trabecular bone. Reprinted with permission from reference (Owens et al., 2016), Elsevier.
FIGURE 7(A) XPS spectra of implanted alloy at different depths; (B) polarisation curves of Mg-Gd-Zn-Zr alloy with various doses in SBF solution; surface and cross-section morphology after corrosion test (C,E) unimplanted and (D,F) Nd implanted alloy. Reprinted with permission from reference (Wang et al., 2015b), Elsevier.
FIGURE 8Surface morphologies of (A) SMATed pure Mg, and (B) SMATed Mg-1Ca alloy; cross-section morphologies of (C–F) SMATed pure Mg for different time, (G–J) SMATed Mg-1Ca alloy for different time, and high magnification images of (K) untreated and (L) SMATed Mg-1Ca alloy. Reprinted with permission from reference (Chen et al., 2019a), Elsevier.
FIGURE 9(A) EBSD map of the cross section of AZ31 samples after shot peening; TEM images (B) bright field image and (C) the corresponding SAED pattern of the shot peening sample just under the topmost layer, bright field images at the depth of (D) 30 μm and (E) 150 μm. Reprinted with permission from reference (Bagherifard et al., 2018; Bagherifard et al., 2019), Elsevier.
FIGURE 10(A) Schematic of laser surface modification process; SEM images of cross section microstructure (B) laser melted Mg-Zn-Dy alloy, (C) and (D) enlarged views, (E) and (F) meltpool depth of the alloy processed at different conditions respectively. Reprinted with permission from reference (Rakesh et al., 2019), Elsevier.
FIGURE 11Fluorescence images of the MC3T3-E1 cell on (A) as-received, (B) laser melted, (C) laser melted and LIPSS, (D) laser melted and micro-groove surface and (E) cell proliferation after cultured for 48 h. Reprinted with permission from reference (Zhang et al., 2019), Elsevier.
FIGURE 12SEM morphologies of the L6 cells on the surface of the samples: (A) control, (B) Mg, (C) FSP-Mg, and (D) FSP-Mg-nHA. Reprinted with permission from reference (Sunil et al., 2014a), Elsevier.