| Literature DB >> 29744398 |
Dongshuang He1, Chen Zhuang1, Sanzhong Xu2, Xiurong Ke3, Xianyan Yang1, Lei Zhang3, Guojing Yang3, Xiaoyi Chen4, Xiaozhou Mou4, An Liu5, Zhongru Gou1.
Abstract
Mechanical strength and its long-term stability of bioceramic scaffolds is still a problem to treat the osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Considering the long-term stability of diopside (DIO) ceramic but poor mechanical strength, we developed the DIO-based porous bioceramic composites via dilute magnesium substituted wollastonite reinforcing and three-dimensional (3D) printing. The experimental results showed that the secondary phase (i.e. 10% magnesium substituting calcium silicate; CSM10) could readily improve the sintering property of the bioceramic composites (DIO/CSM10-x, x = 0-30) with increasing the CSM10 content from 0% to 30%, and the presence of the CSM10 also improved the biomimetic apatite mineralization ability in the pore struts of the scaffolds. Furthermore, the flexible strength (12.5-30 MPa) and compressive strength (14-37 MPa) of the 3D printed porous bioceramics remarkably increased with increasing CSM10 content, and the compressive strength of DIO/CSM10-30 showed a limited decay (from 37 MPa to 29 MPa) in the Tris buffer solution for a long time stage (8 weeks). These findings suggest that the new CSM10-reinforced diopside porous constructs possess excellent mechanical properties and can potentially be used to the clinic, especially for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head work as a bioceramic rod.Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Dilute magnesium substituting wollastonite; Diopside; Mechanical properties; Osteonecrosis of the femoral head; Porous bioceramics
Year: 2016 PMID: 29744398 PMCID: PMC5883955 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2016.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1XRD patterns of the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds after sintering (A) and the 2D, 3D reconstructed structure by μCT (B–E).
Fig. 2Linear (length, width, height) shrinkage of the four different scaffolds after sintering. *p < 0.05.
Fig. 3Fracture microstructure (SEM images) of the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds after sintering.
Fig. 4SEM images of the pore struts in the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds after soaking in SBF for 14 days.
Fig. 5Changes in Ca, Mg and Si concentration in SBF during soaking the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds for 1–14 days.
Fig. 6Bending strength of the DIO/CSM10-x scaffold samples.
Fig. 7Changes in weight of the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds after immersion in Tris buffers for different time periods.
Fig. 8Changes in compressive strength and porosity of the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds after immersion in Tris buffer for different time periods.
Fig. 9SEM images of the fracture surface in the pore struts in the DIO/CSM10-x scaffolds after immersion in Tris buffer for 8 weeks.