Literature DB >> 26739599

Early failures of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants: a case series with retrieval analysis.

Xianzuo Zhang1, Jian Wang1, Jun Xiao2, Zhanjun Shi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS: Porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants have been used in femoral head necrosis for several years, while the clinical outcomes were mixed. As a joint-preserving surgery, early necrosis deterioration and conversion to total hip arthroplasy failed our expectation. We hence investigate an observational study with retrieval analysis to find out the underlying reasons.
METHODS: Thirteen patients were treated with core decompression and implantation of a tantalum rod. The cases were evaluated both functionally and radiologically. We retrieved and analyzed the micro-structural changes and the histopathologic features of four early failed femoral heads with scanning electron microscopy, histopathologic examination, and micro-CT scaning.
RESULTS: All implants were placed in proper positions. One-year survival rate was 64.29 % with a HSS score of 81.11 ± 15.62. Four patients converted to arthroplasty in a mean time of 305 days (0.84 years), with a HSS score of 43.75 ± 7.5 at the last follow-up. A liquid layer surrounded the tantalum implant was noted on MRI in all four failed cases. Volume render CT remodeling revealed interspace between the metal and bone. Scanning electron microscopy and histopathologic examination indicated sparse and isolated bone ingrowth into the implants. The remodeled trabecular bone and the increased density around the peri-implant area were illustrated with micro-CT scaning.
CONCLUSIONS: The deterioration of early failed tantalum implant exceeds the nature of osteonecrosis progression. Rather than insufficient mechanical support resulting in improper position and invalid bone ingrowth, nullification of core decompression and consequential intra-osseous pressurization probably led to early failure of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral head; Osteonecrosis; Porous tantalum osteonecrosis implant; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26739599     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3087-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Core decompression and conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F P Castro; R L Barrack
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2000-03

2.  Bonding of alkali- and heat-treated tantalum implants to bone.

Authors:  H Kato; T Nakamura; S Nishiguchi; Y Matsusue; M Kobayashi; T Miyazaki; H M Kim; T Kokubo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000

3.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head using the osteonecrosis intervention implant.

Authors:  Thilo Floerkemeier; Fritz Thorey; Dorothea Daentzer; Matthias Lerch; Phillip Klages; Henning Windhagen; Gabriela von Lewinski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of core decompression and conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of femoral head at early stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Cai Hong; Hui-Ming Zhong; Tiao Lin; Jian-Bin Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Porous tantalum implant in early osteonecrosis of the hip: preliminary report on operative, survival, and outcomes results.

Authors:  Michael S Shuler; Michael D Rooks; James R Roberson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Tantalum rod implantation and vascularized iliac grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Dewei Zhao; Yao Zhang; Weiming Wang; Yupeng Liu; Zhigang Li; Benjie Wang; Xiaobing Yu
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Tantalum rod implantation for femoral head osteonecrosis: survivorship analysis and determination of prognostic factors for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yaosheng Liu; Liang Yan; Shiguo Zhou; Xiuyun Su; Yuncen Cao; Cheng Wang; Shubin Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Histopathologic retrieval analysis of clinically failed porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants.

Authors:  M Tanzer; J D Bobyn; J J Krygier; D Karabasz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  A new mode of clinical failure of porous tantalum rod.

Authors:  Kwang-Jun Oh; Dilbans Singh Pandher
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Effect of Osteonecrosis Intervention Rod Versus Core Decompression Using Multiple Small Drill Holes on Early Stages of Necrosis of the Femoral Head: A Prospective Study on a Series of 60 Patients with a Minimum 1-Year-Follow-Up.

Authors:  Haixiong Miao; Dongping Ye; Weiguo Liang; Yicun Yao
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-15
View more
  12 in total

1.  Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years.

Authors:  Giovanni Benelli; Merildo Maritato; Pierpaolo Cerulli Mariani; Francesco Sasso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Real-time computerised tomography assisted porous tantalum implant in ARCO stage I-II non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: minimum five-year follow up.

Authors:  Ruyin Hu; Pengfei Lei; Bo Li; Hao Liu; Xucheng Yang; Ting Wen; Yihe Hu; Xiaobin Tian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  What is the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Aurégan; Benoît Villain; Thierry Bégué
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Analysis of peripheral bone reconstruction after the failure of hip osteonecrosis treatment with porous tantalum rod implantation.

Authors:  Weilu Liu; Yong Hu; Zhifa Huang; Zhanjun Shi; Jun Xiao
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Xuan Gong; Steve Sandiford; Xiaoqiang He; Feilong Li; Yuwan Li; Ziming Liu; Leilei Qin; Jianye Yang; Sizheng Zhu; Jiawei Wang; Xiaolin Tu; Lei Ye; Ning Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

6.  Total hip arthroplasty following failure of tantalum rod implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with 5- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Qi Cheng; Jin-Long Tang; Jiang-Jiang Gu; Kai-Jin Guo; Wang-Shou Guo; Bai-Liang Wang; Feng-Chao Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  The Comparative Analysis of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach for a Failed Porous Tantalum Rod Removal During Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fengchao Zhao; Li Zheng; Qi Cheng; Weifan Hu; Bailiang Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-14

8.  Modified trapdoor procedures using autogenous tricortical iliac graft without preserving the broken cartilage for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.

Authors:  Qi Cheng; Feng-Chao Zhao; Shi-Zhuang Xu; Li Zheng; Xin Zheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 9.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  3D printing of Mg-substituted wollastonite reinforcing diopside porous bioceramics with enhanced mechanical and biological performances.

Authors:  Dongshuang He; Chen Zhuang; Sanzhong Xu; Xiurong Ke; Xianyan Yang; Lei Zhang; Guojing Yang; Xiaoyi Chen; Xiaozhou Mou; An Liu; Zhongru Gou
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2016-10-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.