Literature DB >> 29742030

The quality of visual information about the lower extremities influences visuomotor coordination during virtual obstacle negotiation.

Aram Kim1, Kari S Kretch1, Zixuan Zhou2, James M Finley1,3.   

Abstract

Successful negotiation of obstacles during walking relies on the integration of visual information about the environment with ongoing locomotor commands. When information about the body and the environment is removed through occlusion of the lower visual field, individuals increase downward head pitch angle, reduce foot placement precision, and increase safety margins during crossing. However, whether these effects are mediated by loss of visual information about the lower extremities, the obstacle, or both remains to be seen. Here we used a fully immersive, virtual obstacle negotiation task to investigate how visual information about the lower extremities is integrated with information about the environment to facilitate skillful obstacle negotiation. Participants stepped over virtual obstacles while walking on a treadmill with one of three types of visual feedback about the lower extremities: no feedback, end-point feedback, and a link-segment model. We found that absence of visual information about the lower extremities led to an increase in the variability of leading foot placement after crossing. The presence of a visual representation of the lower extremities promoted greater downward head pitch angle during the approach to and subsequent crossing of an obstacle. In addition, having greater downward head pitch was associated with closer placement of the trailing foot to the obstacle, further placement of the leading foot after the obstacle, and higher trailing foot clearance. These results demonstrate that the fidelity of visual information about the lower extremities influences both feedforward and feedback aspects of visuomotor coordination during obstacle negotiation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Here we demonstrate that visual information about the lower extremities is utilized for precise foot placement and control of safety margins during obstacle negotiation. We also found that when a visual representation of the lower extremities is present, this information is used in the online control of foot trajectory. Together, our results highlight how visual information about the body and the environment is integrated with motor commands for planning and online control of obstacle negotiation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  locomotion; obstacle negotiation; virtual reality; visuomotor coordination

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29742030      PMCID: PMC6139439          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00931.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  22 in total

1.  Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment.

Authors:  Shirley Rietdyk; Chris K Rhea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The biomechanics of walking shape the use of visual information during locomotion over complex terrain.

Authors:  Jonathan Samir Matthis; Sean L Barton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Limits of locomotor ability in subjects with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  H J A van Hedel; B Wirth; V Dietz
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Visually guided navigation: head-mounted eye-tracking of natural locomotion in children and adults.

Authors:  John M Franchak; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Visual control of foot placement when walking over complex terrain.

Authors:  Jonathan S Matthis; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  How does the extent of central visual field loss affect adaptive gait?

Authors:  Matthew A Timmis; Amy C Scarfe; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Being Barbie: the size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world.

Authors:  Björn van der Hoort; Arvid Guterstam; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Virtual reality as a tool for evaluation of repetitive rhythmic movements in the elderly and Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  Pablo Arias; Verónica Robles-García; Gabriel Sanmartín; Julian Flores; Javier Cudeiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual feedback is not necessary for the learning of novel dynamics.

Authors:  David W Franklin; Udell So; Etienne Burdet; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Virtually the same? How impaired sensory information in virtual reality may disrupt vision for action.

Authors:  David J Harris; Gavin Buckingham; Mark R Wilson; Samuel J Vine
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Transfer of motor skill between virtual reality viewed using a head-mounted display and conventional screen environments.

Authors:  Julia M Juliano; Sook-Lei Liew
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Influence of body visualization in VR during the execution of motoric tasks in different age groups.

Authors:  Stefan Pastel; Katharina Petri; Dan Bürger; Hendrik Marschal; Chien-Hsi Chen; Kerstin Witte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Locomotor skill acquisition in virtual reality shows sustained transfer to the real world.

Authors:  Aram Kim; Nicolas Schweighofer; James M Finley
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 5.  Parietal maps of visual signals for bodily action planning.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; Alessia Sepe; Luca Bonini
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Navigating Through a COVID-19 World: Avoiding Obstacles.

Authors:  Brooke N Klatt; Eric R Anson
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.