Literature DB >> 27004633

How does the extent of central visual field loss affect adaptive gait?

Matthew A Timmis1, Amy C Scarfe2, Shahina Pardhan3.   

Abstract

Visual impairment is one of the most important clinical risk factors associated with falls. Currently it remains unclear whether adaptive gait is progressively affected as the extent of central visual field loss (CFL) increases, or when CFL exceeds a certain size. 10 participants (aged 22 ± 3 years) negotiated a floor based obstacle in full vision (no occlusion) and wearing custom made contact lenses which simulated 10° CFL and 20° CFL. Movement kinematics assessed the period immediately prior to and during obstacle crossing. In the 20° CFL condition, participants exhibited adaptations in gait which were consistent with being more cautious and more variable during the approach to and crossing of the obstacle, when compared to both 10° CFL and full vision conditions. Specifically, in the 20° CFL condition participants placed their lead foot further from the obstacle, lifted both their lead and trail feet higher and slower over the obstacle, and took longer to negotiate the obstacle when compared to the 10° CFL and full vision conditions. Data highlights differences in adaptive gait as a function of the extent of CFL when compared to full vision. More importantly, these adaptations were only associated with loss of the central 20° of the visual field, suggesting that gait is compromised only after central visual field loss exceeds a certain level.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central visual field loss; Falling; Gait; Obstacle crossing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27004633     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  7 in total

1.  The quality of visual information about the lower extremities influences visuomotor coordination during virtual obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Aram Kim; Kari S Kretch; Zixuan Zhou; James M Finley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of acute peripheral/central visual field loss on standing balance.

Authors:  Caitlin O'Connell; Arash Mahboobin; Scott Drexler; Mark S Redfern; Subashan Perera; Amy C Nau; Rakié Cham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The pickup of visual information about size and location during approach to an obstacle.

Authors:  Gabriel J Diaz; Melissa S Parade; Sean L Barton; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of mobile phone use on where we look and how we walk when negotiating floor based obstacles.

Authors:  Matthew A Timmis; Herre Bijl; Kieran Turner; Itay Basevitch; Matthew J D Taylor; Kjell N van Paridon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Effects of Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Postural Sway.

Authors:  Hortense Chatard; Laure Tepenier; Olivier Jankowski; Antoine Aussems; Alain Allieta; Talal Beydoun; Sawsen Salah; Maria P Bucci
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A low-cost 2-D video system can accurately and reliably assess adaptive gait kinematics in healthy and low vision subjects.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Jonathan Allsop; Juan Tabernero; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Association between the Horizontal Gaze Ability and Physical Characteristics of Patients with Dropped Head Syndrome.

Authors:  Tatsuya Igawa; Ken Ishii; Ryunosuke Urata; Akifumi Suzuki; Hideto Ui; Kentaro Ideura; Norihiro Isogai; Yutaka Sasao; Haruki Funao
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.948

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.