Literature DB >> 29735716

Reducing resistance allele formation in CRISPR gene drive.

Jackson Champer1,2, Jingxian Liu3,2, Suh Yeon Oh3,2, Riona Reeves3,2, Anisha Luthra3,2, Nathan Oakes3, Andrew G Clark3,2, Philipp W Messer1.   

Abstract

CRISPR homing gene drives can convert heterozygous cells with one copy of the drive allele into homozygotes, thereby enabling super-Mendelian inheritance. Such a mechanism could be used, for example, to rapidly disseminate a genetic payload in a population, promising effective strategies for the control of vector-borne diseases. However, all CRISPR homing gene drives studied in insects thus far have produced significant quantities of resistance alleles that would limit their spread. In this study, we provide an experimental demonstration that multiplexing of guide RNAs can both significantly increase the drive conversion efficiency and reduce germline resistance rates of a CRISPR homing gene drive in Drosophila melanogaster We further show that an autosomal drive can achieve drive conversion in the male germline, with no subsequent formation of resistance alleles in embryos through paternal carryover of Cas9. Finally, we find that the nanos promoter significantly lowers somatic Cas9 expression compared with the vasa promoter, suggesting that nanos provides a superior choice in drive strategies where gene disruption in somatic cells could have fitness costs. Comparison of drive parameters among the different constructs developed in this study and a previous study suggests that, while drive conversion and germline resistance rates are similar between different genomic targets, embryo resistance rates can vary significantly. Taken together, our results mark an important step toward developing effective gene drives capable of functioning in natural populations and provide several possible avenues for further control of resistance rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9; biological control; gRNA multiplexing; gene drive; resistance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29735716      PMCID: PMC6003519          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1720354115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

Review 1.  Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Anna Buchman; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Yangbin Gao; Yunde Zhao
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 7.061

3.  Dodging silver bullets: good CRISPR gene-drive design is critical for eradicating exotic vertebrates.

Authors:  Thomas A A Prowse; Phillip Cassey; Joshua V Ross; Chandran Pfitzner; Talia A Wittmann; Paul Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive: Growing Pains for a New Technology.

Authors:  Floyd A Reed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  SLiM 2: Flexible, Interactive Forward Genetic Simulations.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive.

Authors:  Robert L Unckless; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells.

Authors:  Lior Nissim; Samuel D Perli; Alexandra Fridkin; Pablo Perez-Pinera; Timothy K Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Genetic diversity of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations.

Authors:  Kevin M Esvelt; Andrea L Smidler; Flaminia Catteruccia; George M Church
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Andrew Hammond; Roberto Galizi; Kyros Kyrou; Alekos Simoni; Carla Siniscalchi; Dimitris Katsanos; Matthew Gribble; Dean Baker; Eric Marois; Steven Russell; Austin Burt; Nikolai Windbichler; Andrea Crisanti; Tony Nolan
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  75 in total

1.  Tree-sequence recording in SLiM opens new horizons for forward-time simulation of whole genomes.

Authors:  Benjamin C Haller; Jared Galloway; Jerome Kelleher; Philipp W Messer; Peter L Ralph
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 7.090

2.  The ecology and evolution of microbial CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; Stineke van Houte; Sylvain Gandon; Rachel Whitaker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Fitness Components in Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Jingxian Liu; Jackson Champer; Anna Maria Langmüller; Chen Liu; Joan Chung; Riona Reeves; Anisha Luthra; Yoo Lim Lee; Andrew H Vaughn; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Promises and perils of gene drives: Navigating the communication of complex, post-normal science.

Authors:  Dominique Brossard; Pam Belluck; Fred Gould; Christopher D Wirz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary simulations of Z-linked suppression gene drives.

Authors:  Luke Holman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Development and testing of a novel killer-rescue self-limiting gene drive system in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sophia H Webster; Michael R Vella; Maxwell J Scott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Public health concerns over gene-drive mosquitoes: will future use of gene-drive snails for schistosomiasis control gain increased level of community acceptance?

Authors:  Damilare O Famakinde
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Synthetic threads through the web of life.

Authors:  Mary E Power
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  CRISPR Gene Drive Efficiency and Resistance Rate Is Highly Heritable with No Common Genetic Loci of Large Effect.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Zhaoxin Wen; Anisha Luthra; Riona Reeves; Joan Chung; Chen Liu; Yoo Lim Lee; Jingxian Liu; Emily Yang; Philipp W Messer; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.

Authors:  Tom A R Price; Nikolai Windbichler; Robert L Unckless; Andreas Sutter; Jan-Niklas Runge; Perran A Ross; Andrew Pomiankowski; Nicole L Nuckolls; Catherine Montchamp-Moreau; Nicole Mideo; Oliver Y Martin; Andri Manser; Mathieu Legros; Amanda M Larracuente; Luke Holman; John Godwin; Neil Gemmell; Cécile Courret; Anna Buchman; Luke G Barrett; Anna K Lindholm
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.